Crime
Minorities in Pakistan

11th August is marked as the National Day of Minorities. It is our need of the hour as a country to achieve this very harmonious wave within our state, legal frame-work and social fabric of society. In many various dimensions we may seek guidance from Shariah. If we open heartedly perceive, it is very clear within the Holy Quran, Al Baqra verse 256 that “there is no compulsion in Religion”. Further another mentioning in Sura Kaafiroon “You have your way, and I have my way.”

Alongside we find a constitutional regime of a state promise of protection under the tax called Jizyah incorporated in Sura Tawba verse 29. In Sunnah we find different cases where the Holy Prophet Peace Be Upon Him showed exemplary behaviors towards non-Muslims in each and all respects as for instance at the time of Misak-e-Madina, special provisions from in article 30 to 40 of said Document “for protection of minorities “were added specifically making this document first ever Written Constitutional Document in Islamic and world history. The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) attached the highest importance to protecting the life, honour and wealth of all people. Mentioning the life and wealth of people sacred like Kaa’ba he stopped the ongoing bloodshed forever. Abdullah Ibn Abbas (RA) narrated that Allah’s Messenger (pbuh) delivered a sermon on the Day of Nahr, and asked, “ ‘O people! (Tell me) what is the day today?’ The people replied, ‘It is the forbidden (sacred) day.’ He asked again, ‘What town is this?’ They replied, ‘It is the forbidden (Sacred) town.’ He asked, ‘Which month is this?’ They replied, ‘It is the forbidden (Sacred) month.’ He said, ‘No doubt! Your blood, your properties, and your honour are sacred to one another like the sanctity of this day of yours, in this (sacred) town (Makkah) of yours, in this month of yours.’” (Sahih Bukhari).
In Pakistan, the protection of minority rights has been a subject of significant discussion and concern. The Constitution of Pakistan provides some safeguards for minority communities, but the extent and effectiveness of these protections can and does vary. A very strong legal incorporation within the constitutional domain is awaited in its enforcement in its true letter and spirit as it says in the Preamble to Constitution of Pakistan 1973 “Wherein adequate provision shall be made for the minorities freely to profess and practise their religions and develop their cultures.”
A significant reference of Mr. Ardeshir Cowasjee’s article ‘The sole statesman’ published in Dawn in July of 2000 makes an interesting and honest observation of discrepancy with regard to the word “freely” between the original Objectives Resolution and the Annex inserted into the Constitution by P. O. 14 of 1985. The word “freely”, which appears in the original Resolution now Preamble, was missing from the clause: “Wherein adequate provision shall be made for the minorities to freely profess and practice their religions and develop their cultures;”. This has now been corrected by the Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act, 2010 leaving 25 years with a question mark on history of Pakistan.
Furthermore, in guaranteeing fundamental rights Article 20 promises freedom to profess religion and to manage religious institutions. Going further it provides safeguarding against taxation for purposes of any particular religion under Article 21. Concept of protection is clearly manifested even under Article 22, safeguarding educational institutions with respect to any kind of coercion in respect of religion. Article 25 guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the law. Through Article 36, the state has been made responsible to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the minority communities.
Let’s figure out steps taken in furtherance of guarantees promised by Constitutional regime, to evaluate the challenges and faulities so far. Here we see an historical milestone achievement for Sikh community in the shape of Passage of first ever Sikh Marriage Act which surely is an iconic example. As mentioned in The Bramptonguardian.com on August 6, 2008 “The organization, International Punjabi Foundation, last weekend feted visiting Shariah Court judge Syed Afzal Haider, who has just managed to get Sikh marriages recognized in Pakistan – the world’s first country to give legal status to Sikh marriages. Haider was Pakistan’s federal law minister when he piloted the Anand Marriage Act into law. Later this law formulated its final stage in the shape of Sikh Marriage Act 2024 as manifested by Minister for Minorities Affairs, Mr.Ramesh Singh Arora, who briefed the cabinet that Punjab had become the first province in the world to implement Sikh Marriage Act and resultingly Sikhs from other provinces and countries could come to Punjab for registration of their marriage. Further referring to passage by President of Pakistan who has signed into law “the Christian Marriage (Amendment) Act 2024”, during a special ceremony, held at Aiwan-e-Sadr. The Act provides for raising the marriageable age for Christian men and women to eighteen years. HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 2017 is a step further in where law paves the way for regulations on registration of marriages and divorce for Hindus and fixes the minimum marrying age for males and females at 18 years-old. This Act aims to provide for solemnization of marriages by Hindu families and for matters ancillary and incidental thereto and advancement towardsconstitutional obligation that the state shall protect the marriage, the family, the mother and the child and also safeguard the legitimate, rights and interests of minorities.
Challenges and Concerns of today ! Concerns of religious minorities are exacerbated by minimal or zero representation of these communities in key public institutions. The Constitution of Pakistan guarantees fundamental rights, including equality of status, of opportunity and before law, social, economic and political justice, and freedom of thought, expression, belief, faith, worship and association, “subject to the law and public morality” to its citizens. Pakistan is a country and realistically an amalgamation of various cultures, ethnicities, languages, religions, sects and sub-sects. It was created on the principles of a democratic nation, which would ensure that, “everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or indirectly or through freely chosen representatives as ensured and reinforced under Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21 (1). Ninety- five percent of Pakistan’s population is Muslim while the remaining 5% is comprised of Hindus, Christians, Parsis, Ahmadis and a few other denominations. Having a look into workforce participation as women, it’s disappointing that only two percent of minority women work variably as teachers, doctors, nurses, professors or in an office, evidencing their economic marginalization both in formal and informal work.
Looking back on 11th of August, 1948, the Presidential Address to the constituent Assembly of Pakistan by father of Nation; Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah, where we clearly conceive, understand , perceive and absorb the following;
“You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other places of worship in this state of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed that has nothing to do with the business of the State. You will find that in course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the state”.(11-08-1947).
In Pakistan, the protection of minority rights has been a subject of significant discussion and concern. The Constitution of Pakistan provides some safeguards for minority communities, but the extent and effectiveness of these protections can and does vary. Earnest addressal and redressal is the need of time today if we need to create and witness a harmonious and peaceful societal thread and ethnic fabric within our dear country, Pakistan. Implementation and enforcement of Constitution of Pakistan shall be in its true Letters and Spirit. This can be done through initiatives ranging from constitutional, legal, political, and educational reforms, to affirmative initiatives in order to eliminate discrimination and inequality from society.
From violent attacks like this, to social exclusion and harassment, in Pakistan minority-religion members face discrimination daily. This causes socio-political and economic exclusion, and severe marginalization in all aspects of life.The international community must make more concrete efforts to support the cause.Here notable reference is worth mentioning of the National Commission of Human Rights Report July 2024 emphasizing on need to ensure fairness and transparency in implementation of minority quota within employment. To this end, the NCHR advises the Government of Pakistan to empower the National Commission for Minorities to monitor compliance of both; the minority employment quota and the hiring policy regarding non-Muslims introduced within federal and provincial governments. Further, it is advised that special attention be given to empowering women within minority classes to ensure that they have access to employment as well without any discrimination.Specialized police units trained to deal with minority violence are established although a step towards it is evident in the form of Meesaq Centres. Meesaq Centres have been established in all the districts of the province. IG Dr Usman Anwar said that for the protection of the rights of minorities, and the promotion of inter-faith harmony, the Meesaq Centres have been activated in every district and sub-divisions with majority of minorities. Despite the existence of legislation in Pakistan aimed at safeguarding minority groups, there exists a discrepancy between the intended impact of the law and its practical enforcement. Major reason cited for the lack of execution is the “inadequate education and lack of sensitized special training and behavioural approaches provided to key stakeholders in the field of law enforcement, specifically those who serve as police officers” which is the challenge for Law enforcement institutions today.
Challenges and Concerns of today are much more! Lack of acess to advanced education and vocational training and discrimination against non-Muslim students in Pakistani educational institutions is a common widespread issue. Students from minority groups are often subjected to physical, emotional and psychological abuse, including harassment, bullying, assault, and forced conversions. It is often reported that teachers overlook , disregard, or even contribute to this discrimination. In some urban areas, to the extent of Muslim students being forbidden from using the same bathrooms or drinking from the same water sources as Muslim students. It is eye opening fact that religious minority groups such as Christians are over-represented in Pakistan’s slum settlements, though they are not exclusively inhabited by these minorities.
Absence of possession and property titles signify that the inhabitants are incapable of having credits/loans from banks or monetary establishments to better their livelihoods. Frequently, there is a lack of educational institutions and healthcare facilities within or proximate to settlements, and the government does not supply essential amenities. The economy and cities of Pakistan will be significantly enhanced with the advent of safer, aesthetically pleasing, and more productive residential areas for minorities, as this will enable a substantial influx of individuals to join the workforce formal and informal both. Needless to say in crux that minority groups in Pakistan are deprived of several privileges that are the entitlements and eligibilities to the majority population. Consequently, the task of safeguarding the rights of minority groups in Pakistan is challenging and complex. Civil society and non-governmental organizations, along with the minority groups, play a critical and fundamental role in furthering and promoting the goal aiming towards protection of minority rights and their practical and effective implementation at the state level as it is incumbent upon us to respect mankind as it’s a clear direction by Allah Almighty under Surah Isra verse 70 “Indeed, We have dignified the children of Adam”

Crime
Police release new evidence in timeline of Hackman and his wife’s death

Authorities have discovered new information changing the timeline of when they believe Academy Award winning actor Gene Hackman and his wife, Betsy Arakawa, died.
The couple were found dead in their New Mexico home last month with officials saying the pair had been dead for some time before they were discovered by neighbourhood security.
Officials initially said they believed Arakawa died on 11 February and Hackman died one week later.
The Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office now says they have confirmed that Arakawa made multiple calls to a health clinic on 12 February for medical treatment, which the clinic told BBC she never was able to receive.

1:20Listen to the 911 call after two bodies found at Hackman residence
The sheriff’s office said they learned of the calls when they received cell phone data from her phone.
They said there were three calls made that morning to Cloudberry Health, a personalized concierge medical practice in the area. She received a fourth call, also from the clinic.
The sheriff’s office noted it never reported an official date of death for her and said that initially they’d stated that Arakawa’s last known activity was on 11 February. Authorities say she’d exchanged emails with a massage therapist and visited a grocery store, pharmacy and a pet store. Garage clicker data showed she returned home around 5:15 p.m. that day.
Dr Josiah Child, who leads Cloudberry Health, told the BBC that while the clinic had never treated Hackman or Arakawa, she had reached out for medical advice.

“She called and described some congestion but didn’t mention any respiratory distress, shortness of breath, or chest pain,” he said.
Arakawa initially had scheduled an appointment for 12 February but cancelled on 10 February, explaining that she needed to care for her husband, Dr Child said.
- ‘Living in a reel’: How Alzheimer’s left Gene Hackman alone in his final days
- Hackman’s children not named in actor’s $80m will
- What is hantavirus, disease that killed Gene Hackman’s wife?
On the morning of 12 February, she called again seeking treatment but because no doctor-patient relationship had been established, the clinic told her she needed to be seen in person.
“There were a couple calls back and forth to just schedule that appointment for the afternoon, but she never showed up,” Dr Child explained. “Our office called back several times and never got an answer.”
The couple were both found dead on 26 February.
Chief Medical Investigator Dr. Heather Jarrell stated that “based on the circumstances, it is reasonable to conclude that [Betsy] passed away first.”
The Santa Fe medical examiner determined she died from hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, a rare rodent-borne respiratory disease.
Authorities believe Hackman died on 18 February – the date of his last recorded pacemaker activity, which showed an abnormal rhythm of atrial fibrillation.
His cause of death was severe heart disease, with advanced Alzheimer’s disease listed as a contributing factor. Experts believe his Alzheimer’s may have prevented him from realising his wife of more than 30 years was dead in the home where he was living.
If he did, experts told the BBC, he likely went through various stages of confusion and grief, trying to wake her up before the disease caused him to become distracted or too overwhelmed to act – a process that likely repeated for days before he, too, died.
A necropsy report also revealed that one of the couple’s three dogs, which had been crated while recovering from surgery, died from starvation and dehydration.
As the investigation continues, representatives for Hackman and Arakawa’s estate have taken legal action to block the release of body camera footage and other visual evidence from their home when their remains were discovered.
A New Mexico judge has issued a temporary restraining order that prevents their release, with a hearing set for March 31.
Taken From BBC News
Crime
Philippines ex-leader Duterte on plane to The Hague after arrest

A plane carrying the former president of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, has left Manila after the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued a warrant accusing him of crimes against humanity over his deadly “war on drugs”.
He was taken into police custody shortly after his arrival at the capital’s international airport from Hong Kong on Tuesday morning.
Duterte, 79, contested his detention but within hours was on a chartered jet en route to The Hague in the Netherlands, where the ICC sits. Current President Ferdinand Marcos Jr said the country was meeting its legal obligations.
During Duterte’s time in office, thousands of small-time drug dealers, users and others were killed without trial.
Marcos said his predecessor would face charges relating to what he described as Duterte’s “bloody war on drugs”.
“Interpol asked for help and we obliged,” President Marcos told a press conference. “This is what the international community expects of us.”
Duterte’s daughter Sara, who said she would accompany him to The Hague, is vice president and a political rival of Marcos. She has said the arrest amounts to persecution.
Rodrigo Duterte has offered no apologies for his brutal anti-drugs crackdown, which saw more than 6,000 suspects killed when he was president from 2016 to 2022, and mayor of Davao city before that.
Nevertheless,he questioned the basis for the warrant, asking: “What crime [have] I committed?” in a video posted online on Tuesday by another daughter, Veronica Duterte.
“If I committed a sin, prosecute me in Philippine courts, with Filipino judges, and I will allow myself to be jailed in my own nation,” he said in a later video.
In response to his arrest, a petition was launched on his behalf in the Supreme Court – urging it not to comply with the request.
According to a statement from the court’s spokesperson, the former president also called for a declaration that the Philippines withdrawal from the ICC in 2019 “effectively terminated” its jurisdiction over the country and its people.
The ICC says it still has authority in the Philippines over alleged crimes committed before the country withdrew as a member.
Some of Duterte’s supporters rallied at the airport compound, where the former president was taken following his arrest.
“I’m sad because I didn’t think it would come to a point where he would be arrested. For me, he did a lot for our country and this is what they did to him,” one supporter, Aikko Valdon, told the Reuters news agency.
State media said more than 370 police had been deployed to the airport and to other “key locations” to ensure peace was maintained.
While his supporters have criticised the arrest, activists have called it a “historic moment” for those who perished in his anti-drug war and their families, the International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines (ICHRP) said.
“Duterte’s arrest is the beginning of accountability for the mass killings that defined his brutal rule,” said ICHRP chairman Peter Murphy.
The former leader had been in Hong Kong to campaign among the large Filipino diaspora there for the 12 May mid-term elections, in which he had planned to run again for mayor of Davao.
Duterte’s arrest marks the “beginning of a new chapter in Philippine history”, said political scientist Richard Heydarian. “This is about rule of law and human rights.”
Heydarian added that authorities had arrested Duterte promptly instead of letting the matter take its course through the local courts to “avoid political chaos”.
The Duterte and Marcos families formed a formidable alliance in the last elections in 2022, where against the elder Duterte’s wishes, his daughter Sara ran as Marcos Jr’s vice-president instead of seeking her father’s post.
The relationship unravelled publicly in recent months as the two families pursued separate political agendas.
Marcos initially refused to co-operate with the ICC investigation, but as his relationship with the Duterte family deteriorated, he changed his stance.
The demand for justice in Duterte’s drug war goes “hand in hand” with the political interests of President Marcos, Mr Heydarian said.
The ‘war on drugs’
Duterte served as mayor of Davao, a sprawling southern metropolis, for 22 years and has made it one of the country’s safest from street crimes.
He cast himself as a tough-talking anti-establishment politician to win the 2016 elections by a landslide.
With fiery rhetoric, he rallied security forces to shoot drug suspects dead. More than 6,000 suspects were killed by police or unknown assailants during the campaign, but rights groups say the number could be higher.
A previous UN report found that most victims were young, poor urban males and that police, who do not need search or arrest warrants to conduct house raids, systematically forced suspects to make self-incriminating statements or risk facing lethal force.
Critics said the campaign targeted street-level pushers and failed to catch big-time drug lords. Many families also claimed that the victims – their sons, brothers or husbands – were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Investigations in parliament pointed to a shadowy “death squad” of bounty hunters targeting drug suspects. Duterte has denied the allegations of abuse.
“Do not question my policies because I offer no apologies, no excuses. I did what I had to do, and whether or not you believe it… I did it for my country,” Duterte told a parliament investigation in October.
“I hate drugs, make no mistake about it.”
The ICC first took note of the alleged abuses in 2016 and started its investigation in 2021. It covered cases from November 2011, when Duterte was mayor of Davao, to March 2019, before the Philippines withdrew from the ICC.
Since taking power, Marcos has scaled back Duterte’s anti-narcotics campaign and promised a less violent approach to the drug problem, but hundreds of drug-related killings have been recorded during his administration.
Duterte remains widely popular in the Philippines as he is the country’s first leader from Mindanao, a region south of Manila, where many feel marginalised by the leaders in the capital.
He often speaks in Cebuano, the regional language, not Tagalog, which is more widely-spoken in Manila and northern regions.
When he stepped down in 2022, nearly nine in 10 Filipinos said they were satisfied with his performance as president – a score unseen among his predecessors since the restoration of democracy in 1986, according to the Social Weather Stations research institute.
His populist rhetoric and blunt statements earned him the moniker “Donald Trump of the East”. He has called Russian President Vladimir Putin his “idol” and under his administration, the Philippines’ pivoted foreign policy to China away from the US, its long-standing ally.
Marcos restored Manila’s ties with Washington and criticised the Duterte government for being “Chinese lackeys” as the Philippines is locked in sea dispute with China.
China’s foreign ministry said on Tuesday that it was “closely monitoring the development of the situation” and warned the ICC against “politicisation” and “double standards” in the arrest of Duterte.
His political heir, Sara, is tipped as a potential presidential candidate in 2028. The incumbent, Marcos, is barred by the constitution from seeking re-election.
Additional reporting by Virma Simonette in Manila and Kelly Ng in Singapore
Taken From BBC News
-
Europe News3 months ago
Chaos and unproven theories surround Tates’ release from Romania
-
American News2 months ago
Trump Expels Zelensky from the White House
-
American News3 months ago
Zelensky bruised but upbeat after diplomatic whirlwind
-
Politics3 months ago
US cuts send South Africa’s HIV treatment ‘off a cliff’
-
Pakistan News2 months ago
Can Pakistan be a Hard State?
-
American News2 months ago
Trump expands exemptions from Canada and Mexico tariffs
-
Art & Culture2 months ago
International Agriculture Exhibition held in Paris
-
American News2 months ago
U.S. Tariff Policies: A Historical Perspective