American News
Trump’s 90-Day Tariff Pause: A Strategic Recalibration?
Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : In a surprising and dramatic policy reversal, President Donald Trump has announced a 90-day pause on his sweeping new tariffs for nearly every trading partner—except China. The move, announced just hours after the tariffs went into effect, sent markets soaring, calmed international anxiety, and opened a temporary window for diplomatic negotiations. But behind the scenes, this abrupt about-face reveals a complex interplay of economic realities, political pressures, and global trade dynamics that forced the president to back down from a central tenet of his economic ideology.
The president’s post on Truth Social—“a 90 DAY PAUSE”—marked a decisive pivot. While car, steel, and aluminum tariffs remain intact, the suspension of broader trade taxes sent the S&P 500 soaring over 9% in a single day, its best performance since the 2008 financial recovery. Tech stocks, airlines, and auto manufacturers all rallied sharply. Even companies still burdened by tariffs, like Ford and GM, saw significant gains.
In justifying his reversal, Trump said he acted on “instinct” and felt that markets and citizens alike were getting “yippy” and “a little bit afraid.” His folksy language barely concealed the broader truth: the markets were plummeting, and with them, investor confidence in the administration’s economic management.
The president’s change of course was likely motivated by a convergence of several powerful factors. The bond market had shown signs of panic, signaling fears of a looming recession. Meanwhile, the dollar wobbled against global currencies, further stoking anxiety. Perhaps most compellingly, spontaneous demonstrations against the tariffs erupted across the country—from New York to San Francisco—as thousands of Americans protested what they saw as an unjustified and reckless trade war that risked jobs, raised prices, and destabilized global partnerships.
Economists and business leaders had warned for weeks that a prolonged tariff war would increase production costs, especially in key industries reliant on imported raw materials and components. American companies—particularly small- and medium-sized manufacturers—began sounding the alarm, saying they could not pivot supply chains overnight. Even powerful corporate allies of Trump began voicing discontent.
The president’s isolation of China in this tariff pause also underscores the deep geopolitical rivalry between the two economic superpowers. The decision to raise tariffs on all Chinese imports to 125% followed Beijing’s retaliatory move of increasing levies on U.S. goods to 84%. Both sides have now entered a tit-for-tat escalation, further straining relations already tested by restrictions on technology firms, export bans, and accusations of economic espionage.
China’s Ministry of Commerce responded harshly, placing export controls on 12 American companies and designating six more as “unreliable entities”—effectively banning them from Chinese markets. Trump’s team insists that the tariff approach is working, pointing to concessions from countries like Vietnam, Cambodia, and Ecuador, which have signaled willingness to reduce trade barriers and open markets to American products.
Still, there is a growing debate over whether tariffs are the right mechanism to restore American industrial dominance. While the idea is to incentivize domestic production, there are challenges. For instance, the U.S. auto industry has struggled with quality and innovation, leading many consumers to prefer foreign-made vehicles known for their durability, fuel efficiency, and after-sales service. If the administration hopes to make tariffs a long-term policy tool, American industries will need to dramatically improve their competitiveness, not just rely on protectionism.
Trade barriers alone cannot revive domestic manufacturing unless paired with major investments in innovation, training, and infrastructure. History shows that protectionism, while politically appealing, can often stifle innovation by reducing competition. In today’s fast-paced global economy, the U.S. must invest in research and development, automation, and green technologies if it wants to lead again.
The economic impact of tariffs also affects the dollar’s value. When the U.S. imposes tariffs on imports, it increases the cost of foreign goods, often pushing the dollar higher as demand rises. Conversely, retaliatory tariffs on American exports can weaken the dollar, as foreign buyers shift away from U.S. goods. Striking the right balance is tricky, and Trump’s pause might be seen as an effort to stabilize currency markets amid growing global uncertainty.
Beyond economics, international reaction has played a significant role in shaping the administration’s response. Canada, a historically close ally, reacted with rare public fury. As one of the U.S.’s largest trading partners, Canada’s retaliatory measures and national outrage rattled policymakers. The idea that America’s most dependable neighbors were being punished indiscriminately undermined Trump’s case for fair trade and weakened U.S. leadership on the world stage.
The pause also raises deeper concerns about governance. During a congressional hearing on Wednesday, the president’s trade representative, Jamieson Greer, was caught off guard by the announcement. Lawmakers expressed frustration, with Rep. Steven Horsford of Nevada shouting, “This is amateur hour.” The last-minute decision, made without consulting key officials or allies, raises questions about how trade policy is being formulated and whether it reflects a coherent long-term strategy or moment-to-moment reactions.
Meanwhile, Trump’s broader policy direction continues to raise alarms. On the same day as the tariff pause, he reaffirmed plans to revive fossil fuel extraction and reopen coal mines, reversing years of environmental progress. Critics warn that such policies could trigger a global race toward dirty energy production, exacerbating climate change and harming public health.
In light of these developments, it would be prudent for the administration to extend the spirit of the 90-day tariff pause to its energy agenda as well. Just as tariffs deserve reevaluation, so too does America’s environmental policy. Rethinking coal and fossil fuel revival with the same urgency and pragmatism could prevent long-term damage to the planet and bolster America’s standing as a responsible global leader.
In the end, Trump’s 90-day pause on tariffs is both a concession and an opportunity. It reflects the limits of unilateralism in a globally connected world and offers a chance to recalibrate. The U.S. can use this moment not only to renegotiate fairer trade deals but also to reinvest in its own industrial base, green technology, and diplomatic alliances. Whether this pause leads to a sustainable strategy—or merely delays another storm—remains to be seen.
American News
‘The bodies just kept coming’ – photographer at deadly Rio police raid
A photographer who witnessed the aftermath of a massive Brazilian police operation in Rio de Janeiro has told the BBC of how residents came back with mutilated bodies of those who had died.
The bodies “kept coming: 25, 30, 35, 40, 45…”, Bruno Itan told BBC Brasil. They included those of police officers.
One of the bodies had been decapitated – others were “totally disfigured”, he said. Many also had what he says were stab wounds.
More than 120 people were killed during Tuesday’s raid on a criminal gang – the deadliest such raid in the city.
Bruno Itan told BBC Brasil that he was first alerted to the raid early on Tuesday by residents of the Alemão neighbourhood, who sent him messages telling him there was a shoot-out.
The photographer made his way to the Getúlio Vargas hospital, where the bodies were arriving.
Itan says that the police stopped members of the press from entering the Penha neighboorhood, where the operation was under way.
“Police officers formed a line and said: ‘The press doesn’t get past here.'”
But Itan, who grew up in the area, says he was able to make his way into the cordoned-off area, where he remained until the next morning.
He says that Tuesday night, local residents began to search the hillside which divides Penha from the nearby Alemão neighbourhood for relatives who had been missing since the police raid.
Residents of the Penha neighbourhood proceeded to place the recovered bodies in a square – and Itan’s photos show the reaction of the people there.
“The brutality of it all impacted me a lot: the sorrow of the families, mothers fainting, pregnant wives, crying, outraged parents,” the photographer recalled.
The governor of Rio state said that the massive police operation involving around 2,500 security personnel was aimed at stopping a criminal group known as Comando Vermelho (Red Command) from expanding its territory.
Initially, the Rio state government maintained that “60 suspects and four police officers” had been killed in the operation.
They have since said that their “preliminary” count shows that 117 “suspects” have been killed.
Rio’s public defender’s office, which provides legal assistance to the poor, has put the total number of people killed at 132.
According to researchers, Red Command is the only criminal group which in recent years has managed to make territorial gains in the state of Rio de Janeiro.
It is widely considered one of the two largest gangs in the country, alongside First Capital Command (PCC), and has a history dating back more than 50 years.
According to Brazilian journalist Rafael Soares, who has been covering crime in Rio for years, Red Command “operates like a franchise” with local criminal leaders forming part of the gang and becoming “business partners”.
The gang engages primarily in drug trafficking, but also smuggles guns, gold, fuel, alcohol and tobacco.
According to the authorities, gang members are well armed and police said that during the raid, they came under attack from explosive-laden drones.
The governor of Rio state, Cláudio Castro, described Red Command members as “narcoterrorists” and called the four police officers killed in the raid “heroes”.
But the number of people killed in the operation has come in for criticism with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights saying it was “horrified”.
At a news conference on Wednesday, Governor Castro defended the police force.
“It wasn’t our intention to kill anyone. We wanted to arrest them all alive,” he said.
He added that the situation had escalated because the suspects had retaliated: “It was a consequence of the retaliation they carried out and the disproportionate use of force by those criminals.”
The governor also said that the bodies displayed by locals in Penha had been “manipulated”.
In a post on X, he said that some of them had been stripped of the camouflage clothing he said they had been wearing “in order to shift blame onto the police”.
Felipe Curi of Rio’s civil police force also said that “camouflage clothing, vests, and weapons” had been removed from the bodies and showed footage appearing to show a man cutting camouflage clothing off a corpse.
Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has summoned Governor Castro to a hearing on Monday to explain the police actions “in detail”.
American News
Trump’s Asia tour sees deals, knee-bending and a revealing final meeting
US presidential trips abroad have traditionally been an opportunity to display the power of the American nation on the world stage. Donald Trump’s five-day swing through eastern Asia, on the other hand, has been a display of the power of Trump – but also, at times, of that power’s limitations.
Trump’s stops in Malaysia, Japan and South Korea over the course of the first four days were an exercise in pleasing a sometimes mercurial American president. It was an acknowledgement that Trump, with the flick of a pen, could impose tariffs and other measures that have the potential to devastate the economies of export-dependent nations.
His sit-down with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Thursday, however, was something entirely different.
It was a meeting of equals on the global stage, where the stakes for both nations – for their economies, for their international prestige, for the welfare of their people – were enormous.
With China, Trump may flick his pen, but such actions come with consequences. They come with a cost.
For the first four days, Trump’s most recent foray into global diplomacy was smooth sailing.
Each stop was punctuated by a blend of traditional trade negotiations – deals made under the shadow of Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs – and personal accommodations that at times bordered on the obsequious.
In Malaysia, Trump secured access to critical minerals and made progress toward finalising trade arrangements with south-east Asian nations. He also presided over a treaty that should ease border tensions between Thailand and Cambodia – the kind of “peace deal” the American president loves to tout.
In Japan, Trump’s Marine One flew past a Tokyo Tower lit red, white and blue – with a top in Trumpian gold.
Newly elected Prime Minister Sanai Takaichi detailed $550bn in Japanese investments in the US and offered the American president a gift of 250 cherry trees for America’s 250th birthday, and a golf club and bag that belonged to Shinzo Abe, the assassinated former prime minister who bonded with Trump in his first term.
She also became the latest foreign leader to nominate Trump for his much-desired Nobel Peace Prize.
Not to be outdone, South Korea welcomed Trump with artillery firing a 21-gun salute and a military band that played Hail to the Chief and YMCA – the Village People song that has become a Trump rally anthem.
President Lee Jae Myung held an “honour ceremony” for Trump during which he gave the American leader his nation’s highest medal and a replica of an ancient Korean dynastic crown.
Lunch with Lee featured a “Peacemaker’s Dessert” of gold-encrusted brownies. Later that day, the Koreans served Trump vineyard wine at an intimate dinner in Trump’s honour with six world leaders attending the Asia-Pacific Economic Conference summit.
American News
Trump caps refugee admissions at 7,500 – mostly white South Africans
The Trump administration will limit the number of refugees admitted to the US to 7,500, and give priority to white South Africans.
The move, announced in a notice published on Thursday, will apply for the next fiscal year and marks a dramatic cut from the previous limit of 125,000 set by former President Joe Biden.
No reason was given for the cut, but the notice said it was “justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest”.
In January 2025, Trump signed an executive order suspending the US Refugee Admissions Programme, or USRAP, which he said would allow US authorities to prioritise national security and public safety.
The notice posted to the website of the Federal Register said the 7,500 admissions would “primarily” be allocated to Afrikaner South Africans and “other victims of illegal or unjust discrimination in their respective homelands”.
In the Oval Office in May, Trump criticised South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and claimed white farmers in his nation were being killed and “persecuted”.
The White House also played a video which they said showed burial sites for murdered white farmers. Trump said he did not know where in South Africa the scene was filmed.
The tense meeting came just days after the US granted asylum to 60 Afrikaners. It later emerged that the videos were scenes from a 2020 protest in which the crosses represented farmers killed over multiple years.
On his first day in office on 20 January, Trump said the US would suspend USRAP to reflect the US’s lack of “ability to absorb large numbers of migrants, and in particular, refugees, into its communities in a manner that does not compromise the availability of resources for Americans” and “protects their safety and security”.
The US policy of accepting white South Africans has already prompted accusations of unfair treatment from refugee advocacy groups.
Some have argued the US is now effectively shut to other persecuted groups or people facing potential harm in their home country, and even former allies that helped US forces in Afghanistan or the Middle East.
“This decision doesn’t just lower the refugee admissions ceiling,” Global Refuge CEO and president Krish O’Mara Vignarajah said on Thursday. “It lowers our moral standing.”
“At a time of crisis in countries ranging from Afghanistan to Venezuela to Sudan and beyond, concentrating the vast majority of admissions on one group undermines the programme’s purpose as well as its credibility,” she added.
The South African government has yet to respond to the latest announcement.
During the Oval Office meeting, President Ramaphosa said only that he hoped that Trump officials would listen to South Africans about the issue, and later said he believed there is “doubt and disbelief about all this in [Trump’s] head”.
- Europe News8 months ago
Chaos and unproven theories surround Tates’ release from Romania
- American News8 months ago
Trump Expels Zelensky from the White House
- American News8 months ago
Trump expands exemptions from Canada and Mexico tariffs
- American News8 months ago
Zelensky bruised but upbeat after diplomatic whirlwind
- Art & Culture8 months ago
The Indian film showing the bride’s ‘humiliation’ in arranged marriage
- Art & Culture8 months ago
International Agriculture Exhibition held in Paris
- Politics8 months ago
US cuts send South Africa’s HIV treatment ‘off a cliff’
- Politics8 months ago
Worst violence in Syria since Assad fall as dozens killed in clashes