World News
The Global Case for UN Peacekeepers in Gaza
Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : In the annals of modern conflict, Gaza has become the epicenter of a humanitarian catastrophe so deliberate, so brutal, that it no longer shocks — it scars. What is unfolding is not war. It is genocide: systematic, intentional, and aimed at the total destruction of a people — biologically, psychologically, and territorially.
British surgeon Professor Nick Maynard, recently returned from Gaza, described the horror with surgical precision: “One day they have bullet wounds in the legs, the next day in the chest, and then the genitals.” In an emotional interview on Good Morning Britain, he recounted how Israeli forces even confiscated baby formula from his pocket, fearing it might reach Palestinian infants. His testimony is echoed by Doctors Without Borders and the World Health Organization, who have reported waves of targeted injuries, traumatic amputations, and sterilization patterns among young boys — unmistakable markers of war crimes.
According to UNICEF, more than 13,000 children have been killed and 17,000 orphaned since October 2023. The World Food Programme estimates over 90% of Gaza’s population faces catastrophic food insecurity. Infants are dying of hunger. Children are drinking contaminated water. Mothers are giving birth in rubble with no painkillers or antiseptics.
In a bid to whitewash this horror, Israeli officials peddle the narrative that Hamas is stealing aid, selling it on the black market, or using starving civilians as human shields. These claims have been categorically denied by UNRWA, humanitarian NGOs, and even foreign observers operating under tight Israeli and U.S. surveillance. If Hamas truly controlled the aid flow under such intense scrutiny, it would reflect a total failure of Israeli and American military management — or more likely, it exposes the narrative as a calculated deflection.
Despite the mounting body count and overwhelming global condemnation, the killings continue. Schools, hospitals, libraries, water plants — nothing is spared. Francesca Albanese, UN Special Rapporteur on human rights, labeled Israel’s conduct “a textbook case of genocide.” Her detailed report, The Anatomy of a Genocide, outlined the use of starvation, cultural erasure, and mass sterilization. In return, she was sanctioned by the United States, further demonstrating how Washington has become not just a bystander — but an enabler.
Yet around the world, momentum is shifting. In May, France declared recognition of the State of Palestine, followed swiftly by Spain, Ireland, Norway, and Slovenia. Today, over 140 nations formally recognize Palestine. In the UK, more than 100 Members of Parliament have signed a letter demanding their government do the same, alongside supporting tangible actions to stop Israel’s war machine.
Even in the United States, the tide is turning. A recent Gallup poll shows support for Israel among Americans has dropped below 50% for the first time in decades. Particularly among younger Americans, there is outrage over the use of U.S. tax dollars to fund indiscriminate bombings of civilians, hospitals, mosques, schools, and refugee camps. The American people are demanding answers. Why are their weapons — including bunker-buster bombs — being used to massacre women and children? What accountability exists for a foreign ally accused of crimes against humanity?
Yet this raises a central dilemma: Even if the entire international community, including the UN Security Council, agrees to deploy peacekeepers in Gaza — a single U.S. veto can block it all. The United States holds permanent veto power. And history shows it has used this power consistently to shield Israel from international scrutiny, resolutions, and accountability.
This is the elephant in the room. The question now is not whether UN peacekeepers are necessary. That case is undeniable. The real question is: What will it take for the U.S. leadership to finally say — enough is enough?
What point of horror, what threshold of death and starvation, what loss of moral standing will convince Washington that continued blind support for Israel is not only unjustifiable — it is suicidal for American credibility? The United States, once considered the global guardian of freedom, democracy, and human rights, now faces a new perception: that of co-conspirator in ethnic cleansing, financier of genocide, and obstructionist of peace.
The irony is cruel. The nation that prides itself on defending human dignity is now seen globally as the state bankrolling one of the 21st century’s worst atrocities.
If Washington genuinely wishes to restore its moral leadership, it must reset its mindset. Supporting Israel unconditionally no longer guarantees peace — it guarantees continued war. Israel will not be peaceful until it is reined in. Gaza will not recover until the killing stops. And the world cannot assist in rebuilding until the bombs stop falling.
Regional powers now threaten escalation. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has declared that Turkey may intervene militarily if the Gaza massacre continues, comparing Israel’s actions to Nazi crimes. He has suspended arms exports to Israel and frozen defense cooperation.
Simultaneously, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has issued stern warnings that further Israeli aggression could destabilize the entire region. Egypt, while not threatening force directly, has tightened its grip on the Rafah crossing and coordinated a new ceasefire proposal with U.S. backing. These are no longer symbolic gestures — they are warnings of regional war.
Despite these signals, the UN remains paralyzed. Calls for deployment of a United Nations peacekeeping force in Gaza and the West Bank grow louder by the day. The precedent exists — Bosnia, Rwanda, Congo, South Sudan. Under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, the Security Council has the authority to act where there is a threat to peace, a breach of peace, or acts of aggression.
Israel’s campaign satisfies all three. But unless the United States abstains — or supports such a resolution — no force will ever reach Gaza. And so the world watches, powerless, as its own institutions are neutered by one member state’s political fear and moral blindness.
Still, there is a path forward. If the Trump administration — or any future U.S. leadership — truly believes in the principles upon which America was built, then now is the moment to act. Not with words. Not with concern. But with decisive action. Suspend military aid. Support the peacekeeping resolution. Demand accountability.
Only one decision is needed to change the trajectory of this genocide: for the United States to say, “No more.” That single shift — a halt in funding and a vote for peace — would send a shockwave through the Israeli leadership and open the path for healing in Palestine.
What’s at stake is more than Gaza. It is the soul of the international order. It is the credibility of the United Nations. And it is the moral standing of the United States. If America fails now, it may never again be trusted to defend human rights anywhere. If we fail now, we will not just be witnesses to genocide. We will be remembered as its sponsors. If we fail now, we will be remembered not for what we said, but for what we allowed.
World News
Titanic passenger’s watch expected to fetch £1m
A gold pocket watch recovered from the body of one of the richest passengers on the Titanic is expected to fetch £1m at auction.
Isidor Straus and his wife Ida were among the more than 1,500 people who died when the vessel travelling from Southampton to New York sank after hitting an iceberg on 14 April 1912.
His body was recovered from the Atlantic days after the disaster and among his possessions was an 18 carat gold Jules Jurgensen pocket watch that will go under the hammer on 22 November.
Auctioneer Andrew Aldridge, of Henry Aldridge & Son in Wiltshire, told BBC Radio Wiltshire: “With the watch, we are retelling Isidor’s story. It’s a phenomenal piece of memorabilia.”
Mr Straus was a Bavarian-born American businessman, politician, and co-owner of Macy’s department store in New York.
“They were a very famous New York couple,” said Mr Aldridge.
“Everyone would know them from the end of James Cameron’s Titanic movie, when there is an elderly couple hugging as the ship is sinking – that’s Isidor and Ida.”
On the night of the sinking, it is believed his devoted wife refused a place in a lifeboat as she did not want to leave her husband and said she would rather die by his side.
Ida’s body was never found.

The pocket watch stopped at 02:20, the moment the Titanic disappeared beneath the waves.
It is believed to have been a gift from Ida to her husband in 1888 and is engraved with Straus’ initials.
It was returned to his family and was passed down through generations before Kenneth Hollister Straus, Isidor’s great-grandson, had the movement repaired and restored.
It will be sold alongside a rare letter Ida wrote aboard the liner describing its luxury.
She wrote: “What a ship! So huge and so magnificently appointed. Our rooms are furnished in the best of taste and most luxurious.”
The letter is postmarked “TransAtlantic 7” meaning it was franked on board in the Titanic’s post office before being taken off with other mail at Queenstown, Ireland.
Both items will be offered by Henry Aldridge & Son in Wiltshire, with the letter estimated to fetch £150,000.
The watch is set to become one of the most expensive Titanic artefacts ever sold.
The auction house said news of the sale had already generated “significant interest from clients all over the world”.

“Theirs was the ultimate love story – Isidor epitomised the American Dream, rising from humble immigrant to a titan of the New York establishment, owning Macy’s department store,” a spokesperson for the auction house said.
“As the ship was sinking, despite being offered a seat in a lifeboat, Ida refused to leave her husband and stated to him ‘Isidor we have been together all of these years, where you go, I go’.”
The spokesperson added: “This is the reason why collectors are interested in the Titanic story 113 years later – every man, woman and child had a story to tell and those stories now are retold through these objects.”
A gold pocket watch presented to the captain of the Carpathia, the steamship which rescued more than 700 Titanic survivors, sold last year a record-breaking £1.56m.
World News
Major corruption scandal engulfs top Zelensky allies
Ukraine’s energy and justice ministers have resigned in the wake of a major investigation into corruption in the country’s energy sector.
President Volodymyr Zelensky called for Energy Minister Svitlana Grynchuk and Justice Minister Herman Halushchenko’s removal on Wednesday.
On Monday anti-corruption bodies accused several people of orchestrating a embezzlement scheme in the energy sector worth about $100m (£76m), including at the national nuclear operator Enerhoatom.
Some of those implicated in the scandal are – or have been – close associates of Zelensky’s.
The allegation is that Justice Minister Herman Halushchenko and other key ministers and officials received payments from contractors building fortifications against Russian attacks on energy infrastructure.
Among those alleged to be involved are former Deputy Prime Minister Oleksiy Chernyshov and Timur Mindich – a businessman and a co-owner of Zelensky’s former TV studio Kvartal95. He has since reportedly fled the country.
Halushchenko said he would defend himself against the accusations, while Grynchuk said on social media: “Within the scope of my professional activities there were no violations of the law.”
The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (Nabu) and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (Sap) said the investigation – which was 15 months in the making and involved 1,000 hours of audio recordings – uncovered the participation of several members of the Ukrainian government.
According to Nabu, the people involved systematically collected kickbacks from Enerhoatom contractors worth between 10% and 15% of contract values.
The anti-corruption bodies also said the huge sums had been laundered in the scheme and published photographs of bags full of cash. The funds were then transferred outside Ukraine, including to Russia, Nabu said.
Prosecutors alleged that the scheme’s proceeds were laundered through an office in Kyiv linked to the family of former Ukrainian lawmaker and current Russian senator Andriy Derkach.
Nabu has been releasing new snippets of its investigation and wiretaps every day and on Tuesday it promised more would come.
The scandal is unfolding against the backdrop of escalating Russian attacks on Ukrainian energy facilities, including substations that supply electricity to nuclear power plants.
It will also shine a spotlight on corruption in Ukraine, which continues to be endemic despite work by Nabu and Sap in the 10 years since they were created.
In July, nationwide protests broke out over changes curbing the independence of Nabu and Sap. Ukrainians feared the nation could lose the coveted status of EU candidate country which it was granted on condition it mounted a credible fight against corruption.
Kyiv’s European partners also expressed severe alarm at the decision, with ambassadors from the G7 group of nations expressing the desire to discuss the issue with the Ukrainian leadership.
The backlash was the most severe to hit the Ukrainian government since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022 and was only quelled by Zelensky’s decision to reinstate the freedom of the two anti-corruption bodies.
Yet for some that crisis brought into question Zelensky’s dedication to anti-corruption reforms. The latest scandal threatens to lead to more awkward questions for the Ukrainian president.
World News
Italy investigates claim that tourists paid to go to Bosnia to kill besieged civilians
The public prosecutor’s office in Milan has opened an investigation into claims that Italian citizens travelled to Bosnia-Herzegovina on “sniper safaris” during the war in the early 1990s.
Italians and others are alleged to have paid large sums to shoot at civilians in the besieged city of Sarajevo.
The Milan complaint was filed by journalist and novelist Ezio Gavazzeni, who describes a “manhunt” by “very wealthy people” with a passion for weapons who “paid to be able to kill defenceless civilians” from Serb positions in the hills around Sarajevo.
Different rates were charged to kill men, women or children, according to some reports.
More than 11,000 people died during the brutal four-year siege of Sarejevo.
Yugoslavia was torn apart by war and the city was surrounded by Serb forces and subjected to constant shelling and sniper fire.
Similar allegations about “human hunters” from abroad have been made several times over the years, but the evidence gathered by Gavazzeni, which includes the testimony of a Bosnian military intelligence officer, is now being examined by Italian counter terrorism prosecutor Alessandro Gobbis.
The charge is murder.

The Bosnian officer apparently revealed that his Bosnian colleagues found out about the so-called safaris in late 1993 and then passed on the information to Italy’s Sismi military intelligence in early 1994.
The response from Sismi came a couple of months later, he said. They found out that “safari” tourists would fly from the northern Italian border city of Trieste and then travel to the hills above Sarajevo.
“We’ve put a stop to it and there won’t be any more safaris,” the officer was told, according to Ansa news agency. Within two to three months the trips had stopped.
Ezio Gavazzeni, who usually writes about terrorism and the mafia, first read about the sniper tours to Sarajevo three decades ago when Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera reported the story, but without firm evidence.
He returned to the topic after seeing “Sarajevo Safari”, a documentary film from 2022 by Slovenian director Miran Zupanic which alleges that those involved in the killings came from several countries, including the US and Russia as well as Italy.
Gavazzeni began to dig further and in February handed prosecutors his findings, said to amount to a 17-page file including a report by former Sarajevo mayor Benjamina Karic.
-
Europe News9 months agoChaos and unproven theories surround Tates’ release from Romania
-
American News9 months agoTrump Expels Zelensky from the White House
-
American News8 months agoTrump expands exemptions from Canada and Mexico tariffs
-
American News9 months agoZelensky bruised but upbeat after diplomatic whirlwind
-
Art & Culture8 months agoThe Indian film showing the bride’s ‘humiliation’ in arranged marriage
-
Art & Culture9 months agoInternational Agriculture Exhibition held in Paris
-
Politics9 months agoUS cuts send South Africa’s HIV treatment ‘off a cliff’
-
Politics8 months agoWorst violence in Syria since Assad fall as dozens killed in clashes
