Connect with us

Pakistan News

Pakistan’s Strategic Masterstroke: Downing Rafales and Shifting the Balance

Published

on

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : In the wake of India’s recent missile strikes on Pakistan—targeting nine sites, including mosques and civilian infrastructure—the balance of power in South Asia has been dramatically disrupted. While Indian media boasted of its precision strikes, an alternative and far more consequential narrative emerged from within India itself. Eyewitnesses, social media users, and independent sources reported the downing of five Indian fighter jets, including three Rafale aircraft—France’s most advanced export fighters, considered the pride of the Indian Air Force.
If confirmed through independent validation, the loss of these highly sophisticated jets would constitute a military and symbolic setback far greater than the one India sustained during the 2019 Balakot episode. Unlike that episode—where a MiG-21 was shot down and its pilot captured—this time the aircraft were reportedly destroyed without even crossing into Pakistani airspace. The destruction of these jets within Indian territory marks a devastating blow to India’s aerial supremacy, while simultaneously showcasing the evolving technological edge of Pakistan’s defense apparatus.
According to local accounts, defense analysts and independent reports the Indian jets lost communication with ground control and each other mid-flight, with their navigation and command systems abruptly disabled. Strikingly, mobile networks in areas surrounding the incident reportedly collapsed, hinting at a broader electromagnetic jamming operation—a capability rarely demonstrated so visibly in the subcontinent.
This capacity, analysts suggest, stems from Pakistan’s historical partnership with the United States. During the Cold War and especially the post-9/11 War on Terror, Pakistan served as a frontline state and a major non-NATO ally. In this role, it received extensive U.S. training, funding, and technology to jam and intercept militant communications across the Afghan border. Over time, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and military have mastered and localized these tools. Now, that expertise appears to have been redirected toward conventional military threats—with extraordinary results.
The most strategically alarming element for India is that these aircraft were reportedly neutralized within its own territory. This defies conventional engagement rules and shatters the illusion of sanctuary previously associated with Indian airspace. Pakistan’s capability to inflict such damage without physically breaching Indian skies gives Islamabad a decisive psychological and operational edge.
Furthermore, this development underscores India’s vulnerability in future conflicts. Despite extensive modernization and foreign defense procurements, including the multibillion-dollar Rafale deal with France, India’s air defense systems failed to protect its assets from remote disablement and destruction. That vulnerability, exposed by Pakistan without escalation into full-blown war, may trigger a long-term reassessment of India’s military readiness and aerial strategy.
India’s initial missile strikes, while lethal—killing at least 28 civilians and damaging religious sanctuaries—have now been counterbalanced by Pakistan’s tactical retaliation. The destruction of five premier aircraft, particularly the Rafales, serves as both military deterrent and political message. It reflects a sophisticated and proportionate response: Pakistan absorbed the blow, demonstrated capability, and reclaimed initiative—without overstepping into recklessness.
But Islamabad has not yet retaliated with a missile strike of its own. Instead, it has opted for a strategic pause, allowing the psychological pressure to build within Indian corridors of power. This calculated restraint serves multiple goals: it signals maturity, garners international respect, and keeps India in a constant state of anticipation, with its armed forces on high alert—an expensive and exhausting condition to maintain.
This waiting game has gripped India’s leadership, military, and public. Every hour that Pakistan delays its next move deepens Indian anxiety. Troop deployments remain on standby. Fighter jets scramble at false alarms. Decision-makers face mounting political and public pressure to either escalate or retreat.
The paralysis is palpable. For India, this is a worst-case scenario: an adversary that has drawn blood, seized momentum, and now holds the power to dictate the tempo of conflict. With the memory of five aircraft incinerated on home soil, Indian morale is visibly shaken.
Should Pakistan decide to launch a missile-based counterstrike, it is expected to avoid areas like East Punjab—home to India’s Sikh population and the Khalistan movement. Pakistan is unlikely to target regions sympathetic to separatist causes, particularly given its longstanding rhetorical and diplomatic support for Sikh self-determination. Instead, deeper strikes into India’s urban and military infrastructure are on the table. Major command centers, weapons depots, or intelligence facilities linked to anti-Pakistan operations—such as alleged support for BLA militants or anti-state actors in Balochistan—are possible targets.
Pakistan’s security apparatus has long accused Indian agents, including those like Kulbhushan Jadhav, of fostering instability through direct support of the Baloch insurgency and Pakistan-based terror cells. Any retaliatory operation by Pakistan may therefore be framed not just as strategic but also as counter-terrorist in nature—seeking to dismantle what Islamabad sees as India’s covert war within Pakistani borders.
In this fragile equilibrium, nuclear deterrence plays a silent but powerful role. Both India and Pakistan maintain credible second-strike capabilities. However, analysts believe that tactical nuclear superiority, particularly in battlefield-ready deployments, now lies with Pakistan. This asymmetry reinforces the perception that any large-scale conflict would end in mutually assured destruction, dissuading India from escalating beyond conventional limits.
Yet, the downing of aircraft without resorting to nuclear signaling gives Pakistan a new avenue of response—one that is potent yet non-apocalyptic. It affirms that Islamabad can punish aggression without inviting global alarm, thus reclaiming space for calibrated, tech-driven deterrence.
With each passing hour, the strategic pendulum swings further in Pakistan’s favor. India’s rash missile strike—perhaps meant to bolster domestic support or avenge perceived slights—has now backfired spectacularly. Its air force lies bruised, its political elite cornered, and its public haunted by uncertainty. Meanwhile, Pakistan’s decision to delay a missile-based counterattack, while visibly preparing for it, has turned this into a psychological siege.
The question now is not if, but when Pakistan will strike—and how deeply. By choosing the right moment, possibly when India lowers its guard or assumes the storm has passed, Pakistan can deliver a blow that not only balances the score but teaches a lasting lesson. One that redefines red lines, reasserts strategic parity, and restores deterrence in a volatile region where perception often defines reality.
Until then, India waits—nervously, restlessly, sleeplessly—for Pakistan’s next move.

Pakistan News

Pakistan High Commission, London Convenes Experts on Leveraging AI in Healthcare in Pakistan

Published

on

By

Pilot projects for Electronic Medical Record (EMR) systems in major hospitals, starting from Islamabad, to be implemented with public-private partnership in AI and Health

The High Commission of Pakistan in London, hosted a high-level workshop on “Leveraging AI in Healthcare in Pakistan”, bringing together policy makers, AI experts, medical professionals, and academics from the UK and Pakistan.

The session was opened by the High Commissioner, who underscored the transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence to improve healthcare governance, diagnostics, electronic medical records, and medical education in Pakistan. In his pre-recorded keynote address the Federal Minister for National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination, Dr. Syed Mustafa Kamal, emphasised the need to embrace modern technologies and AI to improve public healthcare in Pakistan. In his remarks, Dr. Zubir Ahmed MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the UK Department of Health and Social Care, shared UK’s experience in integrating innovation and AI to enhance health equity and access.

A distinguished line-up of speakers spoke on a range of critical themes. Mr. Abu Bakar, CEO of the Pakistan Software Export Board (PSEB), shared his vision for digital transformation and enabling health technology innovation in Pakistan. Ms. Ayesha Hussain, Data Governance Lead at University of Leeds, discussed responsible AI and data quality frameworks to ensure affordable, accessible, and high-quality healthcare delivery. Mr. Omer Butt, Co-founder of Vita Healthcare Solutions, built a case for AI use-cases that reduce waiting times and treatment delays, while addressing inequities in care delivery. Dr. Mahdi Murtaza – a young doctor – presented a pathway to leverage AI for primary care transformation in Pakistan and development of AI curriculum for medical professionals.

Dr. Suhail Chughtai, Clinical Director for Orthopaedics & Trauma, London, and AI Division Chair at UK Digital Health & Care, spoke about developing an AI-enabled Electronic Medical Records (EMR) system for Pakistan. Professor Jawwad Arshad Darr, Vice Dean of Enterprise at UCL’s MAPS Faculty and Co-founder of UPSIGN, presented strategies for training and developing academic capacity for AI research in Pakistan. Dr. Shahid Latif, Chair of the British Pakistani Psychiatrists Association, focused on AI in mental health care, while Ms. Zehra Shah, CEO of OPEN London, spoke about responsible AI in healthcare and its ethical implications. The discussion concluded with Mr. Rehman Qamar, Chief Project Officer at NADRA, who highlighted how NADRA’s citizen database could underpin secure, scalable digital health systems and EMR integration in Pakistan.

Participants agreed on several key outcomes, including the need for a national AI-enabled health data strategy, public-private partnership in AI and Health, the piloting of EMR systems in major hospitals, and the development of AI training curricula for medical professionals. They noted that building a Responsible AI Framework in Healthcare, which embeds Responsible AI principles into AI Applications and processes, was a must. They also agreed to re-convene to discuss other aspects of AI in healthcare in coming days.

The High Commissioner reaffirmed its commitment to present these recommendations to the stakeholders in Islamabad, ensuring that Pakistan could harness AI to deliver better healthcare for every citizen.

London, 24th September 2025

Continue Reading

Pakistan News

Pakistan’s Voice of Conscience at the United Nations

Published

on

By

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : In the crowded halls of diplomacy, where words often drown in endless speeches, moments arise that define not only the speaker but the nation behind him. Such a moment recently came when Pakistan’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Ambassador Asim Iftikhar, stood before the world and dismantled Israel’s attempt to misuse Pakistan’s sacrifices in the fight against terrorism to justify its indiscriminate assault on Gaza. His intervention not only forced an unprecedented apology from Israel’s ambassador, Danny Danon, but also reaffirmed Pakistan’s moral authority as the voice of conscience for the Muslim world and for oppressed people everywhere.
For me, this triumph was not just a matter of national pride but also personal reflection. Two years ago, while waiting for an audience with President Arif Alvi in Islamabad, I met Ambassador Asim Iftikhar as he prepared to assume his responsibilities as Pakistan’s envoy to France. In those quiet minutes, I found him to be articulate, deeply thoughtful, and radiating professionalism. There was in his demeanor a rare blend of intellectual precision and quiet confidence, qualities that I felt would take him far in representing Pakistan. That impression, formed in the corridors of the presidency, has since been vindicated in the most remarkable way, culminating in his recent performance at the United Nations where he shone not only as Pakistan’s voice but as the spokesperson of the Muslim world.
The confrontation that revealed his strength of character unfolded when the Israeli ambassador attempted to draw an analogy between Israel’s bombardment of Gaza and the U.S. operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, which killed Osama bin Laden. It was a deliberate distortion, intended to cloak genocide in the language of counterterrorism, and it invoked Pakistan’s history in a way that was both misleading and offensive. Ambassador Iftikhar rose with words that pierced the façade. He reminded the world that Pakistan had been a frontline state in the global fight against terrorism, losing more than seventy thousand men, women, and children, dismantling terror networks, and rendering sacrifices unmatched by any other nation. “Pakistan’s record,” he declared, “is bright, recognized worldwide, and written in the blood of its martyrs.” He then turned the analogy on its head, pointing out with clarity that invoking Pakistan’s sacrifices to justify the mass killing of innocents in Gaza was “outrageous, incoherent, and morally indefensible,” for what Israel was doing was not counterterrorism but genocide, ethnic cleansing, and the conversion of Gaza into a slaughterhouse.
The chamber fell silent. Rarely does rhetoric give way to truth so powerfully, and rarely is propaganda so effectively exposed. The weight of his words left Israel’s representative cornered, and in a rare act of contrition, Danny Danon publicly apologized to Pakistan, admitting that invoking its name had been inappropriate. It was more than a diplomatic win; it was a narrative triumph, a moment where Pakistan’s honor was defended, its sacrifices acknowledged, and Israel’s distortion dismantled. For Pakistan, it was a reminder of the power of words when spoken with conviction, and for the Muslim world, it was proof that a principled voice could still rise above the noise of power politics.
This intervention was not an isolated act but part of a larger continuum of Ambassador Iftikhar’s work. Again and again at the United Nations, he has projected the suffering of Gaza and the West Bank with unflinching clarity. In June this year, he declared before the General Assembly that “the situation in Gaza is a stain on our collective conscience. Over fifty-five thousand lives have been lost, including eighteen thousand children and twenty-eight thousand women. Infrastructure has been razed—homes, hospitals, schools, cultural heritage, places of worship. Famine looms. Humanitarian workers and UN personnel are being attacked with impunity. This is not just a humanitarian catastrophe; it is a collapse of humanity.” These were not the words of a man speaking only for Pakistan. They were the words of a diplomat mobilizing the conscience of the world, urging not only the Muslim community but all of civilization to act, to recognize that without justice there can be no peace. He has repeatedly called for the only viable solution: the realization of a two-state solution on pre-1967 borders, with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as the capital of a sovereign, independent, and contiguous State of Palestine.
By vividly describing demolished schools, destroyed hospitals, displaced families, starving children, and the blockade of humanitarian aid, he has carried the Palestinian tragedy from the rubble of Gaza to the chambers of the United Nations, where it cannot be ignored. He has mobilized not just the Muslim world but also neutral states, civil society, and even hesitant Western capitals to rethink their silence. His interventions have contributed to the momentum behind resolutions in the General Assembly, including Pakistan’s pivotal role in the historic vote affirming the two-state solution, a success story of multilateral diplomacy where Pakistan once again played a leading role.
His diplomacy is marked by dignity. In confronting Israel, he did not descend into anger or hyperbole. Instead, he marshaled facts, invoked moral clarity, and exposed propaganda with surgical precision. He reminded the world that the fight against terrorism cannot be equated with the slaughter of innocent civilians, and in doing so, he not only defended Pakistan’s honor but also gave voice to the millions of Palestinians trapped under bombardment and occupation. His words carried the weight of truth, and truth compelled even Israel, often shielded by its allies, to apologize.
This was Pakistan at its finest—firm, dignified, principled. It was not just defending its own history but championing the cause of justice for Palestine, exposing tyranny, and mobilizing the conscience of the world. For me, watching this unfold brought back that first impression I had of him in Islamabad, a man destined to leave his mark. He has not only fulfilled that promise but exceeded it, standing tall as a diplomat whose words moved nations and whose voice gave hope to the oppressed.
The United Nations may often be a theater of speeches with little consequence, but sometimes, words alter the moral landscape. Through Ambassador Asim Iftikhar, Pakistan has shown that truth, when spoken with conviction, can silence distortion, compel apologies, and remind the world that dignity and justice still matter. In that chamber, Pakistan’s voice was heard and respected. It was the voice of a nation that has suffered and sacrificed, yet continues to stand for justice—not only for itself but for all oppressed peoples. And in that moment, Pakistan reminded the world that diplomacy, at its best, is not about power but about conscience, and that conscience, when articulated with courage, can still shake the foundations of injustice.

Continue Reading

Pakistan News

Ambassador Mumtaz Zahra Baloch Meet The Pakistani Students In France

Published

on

By

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY):- Ambassador Mumtaz Zahra Baloch held an interactive session with a group of Pakistani students in France. The Ambassador listened to the views and concerns of Pakistani students and outlined the various initiatives of the Government of Pakistan to support overseas Pakistanis.

She underscored the important role of Pakistani students and academia in promoting Pakistan-France relations and encouraged them to act as a cultural bridge between the two societies.

Continue Reading

Trending