Pakistan News
Pakistan’s Retaliation Will Be Loud and Lethal
Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : In a bold, assertive, and unambiguous press briefing, Major General Choudhary Sharif, Director General of ISPR, addressed the nation and the world with a clarity that left no room for ambiguity. He declared with complete confidence that the Pakistan Air Force had downed five Indian aircraft. These aircraft, in defiance of Pakistani airspace, were tracked, targeted, and neutralized — despite India’s so-called advanced air defense systems. His assertion has now been validated by independent international observers and defense analysts, dismantling India’s narrative of aerial supremacy.
General Sharif assured the public and the international community that Pakistan’s surveillance, detection, and defensive capabilities are fully active. Every hostile object — missile, drone, or aircraft — that enters or nears Pakistani territory is being detected, evaluated, and decisively countered. He emphasized that India had chosen the timing of its aggression; now it is Pakistan’s turn to respond — at a time of its choosing, with weapons of its choice, and on targets that will reverberate not just within India, but across the world.
Refuting Indian media propaganda, General Sharif categorically denied that Pakistan had launched any strikes into Sikh-majority regions or East Punjab. “We don’t need Indian media to announce our operations,” he said sharply. “When Pakistan strikes, the world will know. It will not be through propaganda — it will be through precision, impact, and undeniable facts on the ground.”
These words — clear, confident, and chilling for the Indian establishment — signify more than just a rhetorical counterpunch. They reflect a dangerous escalation, a warning wrapped in surgical calm, and a signal to global powers that Pakistan is neither weak nor reckless, but prepared and determined.
India, intoxicated by its perceived aerial, land, and economic might, seems to have lost the capacity for rational cost-benefit analysis. Its decision to attack Pakistan in response to the Pahalgam incident — an incident not proven to involve Pakistan in any way — was nothing short of reckless. The entire operation backfired dramatically. Not only did Kashmiris on the ground refuse to accept the Indian narrative blaming Pakistan, but even sections of the Indian public, civil society, and media demanded an internal inquiry into the massive security lapse.
How, they asked, could such an attack take place in what is considered one of the most heavily militarized zones on Earth? Who was asleep at the helm? Instead of offering answers, the Indian government launched missiles at Pakistani territory.
In return, India has so far lost approximately $1.5 billion worth of military assets — including five fighter jets, among them three of its prized French-built Rafales. These aircraft, considered the pride of the Indian Air Force, were destroyed by Pakistan’s integrated air defense systems and electronic warfare units, which not only intercepted their communications but reportedly disrupted regional mobile networks to blind and isolate them mid-flight.
On the other hand, Pakistan has reported no losses. Zero.
General Sharif’s message left no doubt: Pakistan’s response will be measured, proportional, and devastating. It will not be impulsive or reactionary; it will be strategic. Pakistan now holds the initiative and will strike at the time, place, and with the force it chooses.
India, meanwhile, waits in dread. It has transitioned from aggression to anxiety, from roaring threats to trembling anticipation. The very public that cheered the initial missile attacks on Pakistan is now worried, speculating where and how Pakistan might retaliate. Indian leadership, once chest-thumping and confident, is reportedly in panic mode.
And rightly so.
Pakistan has proven that it can shoot down India’s most sophisticated aircraft, blind its pilots, and disrupt its military infrastructure without crossing borders or engaging in full-scale war. It has, in effect, neutralized India’s military advantage through superior strategy, better training, and tested deterrence doctrines.
India’s self-image as the “regional policeman,” backed by the United States and Western allies as a counterweight to China, has distorted its judgment. It believed that grandstanding, hollow threats, and missile posturing would intimidate Pakistan. But it failed to account for Pakistan’s military maturity, its battle-hardened forces, and its commitment to defend its sovereignty at all costs.
India’s loss is not just military. Its global standing has taken a hit. Its security narrative has collapsed. Its so-called Rafale deterrent has turned into a liability. And its propaganda, amplified by a complicit media ecosystem, has been discredited.
Now, India stands exposed — not just to Pakistan, but to the world.
The ball is now in Pakistan’s court. And Pakistan will act. But the larger question remains: what comes after?
Pakistan must and will neutralize the damage inflicted upon it — militarily, diplomatically, and psychologically. It is within its sovereign right to respond, and it will do so with credibility and clarity. However, once the score is settled, India must demonstrate restraint, recalibrate its posture, and abandon its fantasies of unipolar regional domination.
New Delhi must initiate an independent inquiry — perhaps under international supervision — into the Pahalgam attack. It must apologize and offer compensation for the civilian casualties and infrastructure damage caused by its unprovoked missile strikes on Pakistan. Failing that, it will continue to lose credibility and stature, not only in the eyes of Pakistanis but globally.
The United Nations, the OIC, and all peace-loving nations must now step in. It is not enough to call for restraint after the damage is done. They must hold India accountable for its unilateral aggression. They must recognize Pakistan’s right to self-defense. And they must ensure that mechanisms are put in place to prevent such reckless military adventurism in the future.
Pakistan’s message is simple: Don’t mistake composure for weakness. Don’t confuse diplomacy with docility. And never underestimate a nation that has fought for its survival since birth.
The final message to India is this: never take your adversary for granted. Arrogance may lift your chest for a day, but reality will hit like a missile. Today, India has a bloody nose. Tomorrow, if it does not change course, it may lose much more.
Pakistan has shown restraint. But it has also shown resolve. And now, the countdown has begun — not for war, but for a correction in the regional balance, forced upon India by its own folly.
Pakistan News
PM Shehbaz again thanks Trump for ‘bold and decisive leadership’ in brokering Pak-India ceasefire
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Saturday, once again, thanked the “bold and decisive leadership” of US President Donald Trump for brokering a ceasefire between Pakistan and India during the conflict between the two nuclear neighbours in May.
While addressing Azerbaijan’s Victory Day parade in Baku, the premier praised President Trump’s exemplary leadership, which led to the success of the peace efforts.
“It was President Trump’s, bold and decisive leadership, that brought about, the ceasefire, between Pakistan and India, restoring peace in South Asia — averting a major war, and saving millions of people.”
In his speech, the PM reiterated that Pakistan, “just like their Azerbaijani and Turkish brothers”, seeks peace, adding that no one can ever be allowed to challenge its sovereignty or undermine its territorial integrity.
The premier recalled that the Azerbaijani and Turkish military contingents had “proudly” marched alongside the Pakistani armed forces in Islamabad amid tremendous applause on August 14 this year, when they celebrated ‘Marka-i-Haq’ to commemorate their “historic victory” in the four-day war with India.
The Pakistan Army had named the period of conflict with India from the April 22 Pahalgam attack to the May 10 conclusion of Operation Bunyanum Marsoos as “Marka-i-Haq” in May.
PM Shehbaz highlighted how, five years ago, “the courageous sons of Azerbaijan, under the bold and visionary leadership of President Ilham Aliyev, rose to respond to the call of history”.
“The world witnessed in awe as Azerbaijan’s brave armed forces liberated their ancestral lands of majestic Karabakh,” the PM stated. “Throughout this entire struggle for liberation, Pakistan stood like a rock with its brotherly country Azerbaijan.”
According to PM Shehbaz, Azerbaijan’s victory in Karabakh was a “glorious vindication” of a just cause and a beacon of hope for all nations striving for sovereignty and self-determination, including the brave and resilient people of Gaza and Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir.
The prime minister arrived in Baku on Friday for a two-day official visit to Azerbaijan at Aliyev’s invitation and to attend the country’s Victory Day ceremony.
Referring to the recent flare up with the Afghan Taliban regime, the prime minister said that their common resolve for peace has most recently been tested in the case of Afghanistan and expressed gratitude to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan as well as to Emir of Qatar Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani for their “invaluable contribution” in facilitating, the peace efforts, between Pakistan and Afghanistan.
“This is a true reflection of the strong and time-tested fraternal ties between our countries that stand together, through thick and thin,“ he opined.
Victory Day is observed to “commemorate the historic victory in the 44-day-long Karabakh Liberation War against Armenia”, according to the PM’s Office.
Pakistan News
Bill for 27th Constitutional Amendment tabled in Senate after federal cabinet’s approval
Shortly after getting approval from the federal cabinet, the bill for the 27th Constitutional Amendment was tabled before the Senate on Saturday and subsequently referred to the standing committees on law and justice.
A joint session of both the NA and Senate standing committees on law and justice was then summoned to discuss the amendment.
However, during the session of the standing committees, two Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) members, Aliya Kamran and Senator Kamran Murtaza, boycotted the meeting and said the proposed draft included amendments that were discarded in the 26th Amendment bill.
Following deliberations on the proposed amendment, the law committees of both Houses adjourned the moot till Sunday.
‘Discussions will continue till consensus is reached’
Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar, speaking to the media after the adjournment of the committees, said all parties were participating in the session and they had also “requested the opposition to participate”.
“Aliya Kamran had informed us that they have instructions from their party not to attend the session; however, all other parties were in attendance. We even asked the opposition to be a part of the session.”
Tarar said the “long-awaited” proposed amendment has been in discussion for the last 10-15 years. “Even today we are having a constructive debate on the matter.”
“At the time of the 18th Amendment, it was on the constitutional agenda, and even earlier, during the 26th Amendment, but due to certain reasons, one of which was Maulana Fazlur Rehman’s suggestion that such a major change should not be made and that it would be better to move towards transition and form constitutional benches,” said Tarar.
The law minister elaborated that the formation of the benches increased the workload of the judiciary, as the same judges were hearing cases fixed for the bench and otherwise.
“The objective was to ensure that the cases fixed in the Supreme Court are not delayed further and the common man gets relief.”
Tarar added that one of the aims of the proposed changes is also to do away with the criticism of a “court within a court”. “All members have reviewed it (proposed constitutional amendment) and we have completed arguments on around 60pc of the clauses.”
The law minister said a few questions have been raised by some members, clarifying that they are legal in nature and “not fundamental issues”.
“We will reconvene again tomorrow morning at 11am and continue our discussions. And till the time we do not reach a consensus, from all members of both Houses, the discussions will continue,” said the law minister.
The Senate and standing committee sessions will resume on Sunday, November 9.
Farooq H. Naek said no decision has been reached yet after deliberations on the proposed constitutional amendment, and claimed around 80pc of the bill was discussed.
He added that certain “mistakes” in the draft will be corrected and the law ministry has been made aware.
When asked about changes to Article 243, he said it was not discussed during today’s session.
Tarar tables bill in Senate
The bill, which was tabled in the Senate by the law minister, proposed the formation of a Federal Constitutional Court, changes in the process for appointing high court judges, changes to the threshold for provincial cabinets, and changes to the military leadership structure.
At the outset of the session, Tarar — who had earlier in the day briefed the media on some features of the proposed legislation after the federal cabinet meeting — requested the suspension of the question hour and other house business so he could brief lawmakers on the amendment.
The law minister then moved the bill before the upper house, with Chairman Yousuf Raza Gillani referring it to the National Assembly and Senate standing committees on law and justice for review and consideration. He said that both committees may hold joint meetings for a detailed review and consideration, and the report would be presented before the House.
Pakistan News
PTI, Imran should ‘take a step back’; govt should create space for engagement: Fawad
Former PTI leader Fawad Chaudhry said on Monday that both the government and the PTI, along with Imran Khan, need to show flexibility in order to create space for engagement to decrease the political friction in the country.
Fawad is one of the three former PTI leaders who say they have been engaging with the party’s incarcerated leadership to put an end to politics of confrontation as part of their political outreach initiative.
They also visited PTI leader Shah Mahmood Qureshi, after he was taken to a hospital in Lahore from prison, on Thursday, to convince him to join their campaign.
“I’ve said this from the first day, the government should move one step forward and the PTI and Imran Khan should move back one step so space is created,” said the former PTI leader while speaking during an interview on DawnNewsTV show ‘News Wise’.
He maintained that both sides would have to decide on the need to bring down the temperature, warning that if the PTI did not pursue engagement and talks, it would face similar treatment as the disbanding and ban on the proscribed Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan.
“The government needs this, because whatever international successes they have gained are not translating into Pakistan … so both sides need the temperature to come down. We think the leaders of Lahore should play the role of a pivot and take this forward.”
Chaudhry added that the immediate need was to lower the political temperature, saying talks could not proceed if both sides could not even bear to see each other.
Defending his former party’s obstinacy against engagement in talks, he said it was also due to the behaviour of the government, which had made a policy of “crushing and sidelining” the opposition.
“The two ruling parties, the establishment and the PTI, are the four big players and the political temperature between them should come down. How will that happen? …you will have to give the leadership in Lahore’s jail the chance to talk to Imran Khan.”
He further said that the establishment and the government needed to decide whether the country needed a reduction in political temperature or not. “I am very hopeful they have this view too.”
Referring to the group’s recent activities, Chaudhry said they had a meeting of at least 45 minutes with Qureshi.
He added that the proposal being carried by the group was not even their own, instead pointing to a letter by incarcerated PTI leaders in Lahore earlier this year, which called for a reduction in political friction and encouraged engagement.
Chaudhry was not without criticism for the government, saying it had backed the PTI into a corner. “If you don’t engage with the PTI, the only way forward it has is to protest,” he said.
The former federal minister added that in such a situation, the PTI could lead a protest to Islamabad and resign from the National Assembly, while the government would attempt to impose governor’s rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, which would be resisted by the party.
“Another event like November 26, 2024, will happen, and as a result of this, the tensions and political temperature in Pakistan will increase. The problem right now is that, we the people, living in Pakistan are being severely impacted by this,” he said, adding that the group had requested the incarcerated PTI leaders in Lahore that if there was no implementation of their earlier recommendation, it would lead to great loss for both the party and the government.
He also said the fact that the group was allowed to meet the incarcerated PTI leadership in Kot Lakpat jail was an encouraging sign.
“Senior government ministers called me and appreciated the effort,” he said, pointing to Information Minister Attaullah Tarar’s welcoming of the development in particular.
“Senior PTI leadership also called and said that this is the only way.”
-
Europe News8 months agoChaos and unproven theories surround Tates’ release from Romania
-
American News8 months agoTrump Expels Zelensky from the White House
-
American News8 months agoTrump expands exemptions from Canada and Mexico tariffs
-
American News8 months agoZelensky bruised but upbeat after diplomatic whirlwind
-
Art & Culture8 months agoThe Indian film showing the bride’s ‘humiliation’ in arranged marriage
-
Art & Culture8 months agoInternational Agriculture Exhibition held in Paris
-
Politics8 months agoUS cuts send South Africa’s HIV treatment ‘off a cliff’
-
Politics8 months agoWorst violence in Syria since Assad fall as dozens killed in clashes
