Pakistan News
Now India Waits for a Befitting Attack from Pakistan

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : At around 01:00 a.m. in Pakistan, the fragile peace between India and Pakistan shattered under the weight of Operation Sindoor—a coordinated Indian missile assault that struck eight different sites across Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir. The Indian Armed Forces launched 24 long-range missiles, causing the deaths of 26 civilians and injuring 46 others, according to Pakistan’s Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations (DG ISPR), Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry.
The attacks were not aimed at alleged terror camps or militant training bases. Strikingly, none of the religious schools (madrasas)—typically accused of extremist indoctrination—were targeted. Instead, the missiles hit three prominent mosques: Bilal Mosque in Muzaffarabad, Abbas Mosque in Kotli, and a mosque in Muridke. Additional civilian infrastructure, such as a dispensary in Shakargarh and homes in Kotli Loharaan near Sialkot, was also damaged.
This choice of targets has sparked widespread outrage. Mosques—houses of worship for over a billion Muslims worldwide—lack the secrecy, space, or structure to host covert militant training. They are by definition public, open, and sacred. By attacking these sites, India risks being viewed not as a counter-terrorist actor, but as an aggressor targeting Islamic symbols. Even if Muslim governments remain silent, public opinion across the Muslim world—from North Africa to Southeast Asia—is likely to turn sharply against India.
India claims the strikes were in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir, which killed 25 Indians and one Nepali national. It accuses Lashkar-e-Taiba and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi of orchestrating the attack from within Pakistan. However, India has released no evidence, conducted no international investigation, and bypassed all diplomatic forums in launching the strikes.
From a military analyst’s perspective, the method of attack marks a doctrinal shift. India used only missiles—avoiding manned aircraft—reflecting its evolution toward stand-off, unmanned precision warfare. Most missiles hit their intended targets, indicating advanced satellite guidance and geospatial targeting. Yet this assessment is based purely on impact outcomes, not on any Pakistani concession.
What is even more troubling is what the attack revealed about regional air defense capabilities. Since the Pahalgam incident, Pakistan’s military—including its Air Force and ground units—had been placed on high alert, anticipating an Indian strike. And yet, according to the DG ISPR briefing, not a single Indian missile was intercepted. This disturbing fact demonstrates that South Asia may now have entered a phase of warfare where neither country’s defense systems are capable of reliably intercepting incoming projectiles.
In a region with two nuclear-armed states, this vulnerability transforms every preemptive strike into a potentially catastrophic escalation. It shows that technological advancements in missile delivery now outpace both countries’ ability to defend against them. And while both sides may feel empowered by their offensive precision, the reality is that they are both deeply exposed. India, being the larger power with more to lose, should have considered this carefully before opting for missiles over negotiations.
India, a country that proclaims itself a global power and the world’s largest democracy, had every opportunity to show restraint and leadership. It could have pursued international inquiry, shared intelligence with allies, and allowed diplomacy to guide its actions. But it chose impulsiveness over introspection, escalation over evidence. Instead of rising above the conflict, India descended into it—and in doing so, dragged itself down to the very level it seeks to rise above.
Pakistan, though cornered economically and politically, is now in a position where a retaliatory strike is not just expected—it is inevitable. However, the nature of the retaliation remains flexible. Pakistan can still respond with strategic insight and moral clarity.
One of its most potent options lies in targeting India’s water infrastructure—specifically, the dams constructed over the Jhelum, Chenab, and Indus rivers. These dams, long used by India as strategic leverage against Pakistan, could be neutralized with minimal civilian casualties but maximum strategic impact. Destroying them would invalidate India’s threats to weaponize water, reverse a decade of infrastructure investment, and shift psychological momentum back in Pakistan’s favor.
In the global arena, reactions remain measured. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed via X that he was briefed by Indian National Security Adviser Ajit Doval and is “monitoring the situation closely.” President Donald Trump, speaking at the White House, called the escalation “a shame,” adding, “I just hope it ends very quickly.” Rubio echoed this sentiment and pledged to engage with both sides toward a peaceful resolution.
Meanwhile, India’s civilian response suggests fear of imminent retaliation. Multiple Indian airlines—including Air India, IndiGo, and SpiceJet—have suspended flights to and from Kashmir and border cities like Jammu, Srinagar, Leh, Amritsar, and Rajkot. Airports have been closed, and two international flights were diverted to Delhi mid-air. India’s military readiness may have initiated the strike, but it now waits—along with its civilians—for the inevitable Pakistani response.
Pakistan has long accused India of supporting terror activities through proxies in Balochistan and the Pakistani tribal belt via Afghanistan. If Pakistan chooses to strike facilities it believes house or train anti-Pakistan insurgents, it would merely be applying the very justification India used for Operation Sindoor. The difference would be: this time, Pakistan could choose its targets wisely—perhaps avoiding religious or civilian sites to preserve the very moral contrast India has just erased.
Moreover, this episode ushers in a new era of warfare in the subcontinent—dominated by unmanned precision systems, drones, robotic ground units, and artificial intelligence-enhanced missiles. Both countries are entering a battlefield where deterrence depends less on numbers and more on seconds—on who strikes first, and who survives the counterstrike.
For now, India waits. Not in victory, but in uncertainty.
Pakistan’s military leadership has stated unequivocally that the response will come “at a time and place of our choosing.” Whether it strikes strategic installations, economic chokepoints, or infrastructural vulnerabilities, Pakistan’s response will redefine the terms of engagement—and the geopolitical balance of the region.
India may have launched the first strike, but it has lost the strategic narrative. It has violated religious sanctity, bypassed international process, and exposed both itself and the region to a dangerous new normal.
Now, the world watches. And India waits.
Pakistan News
Pakistan High Commission, London Convenes Experts on Leveraging AI in Healthcare in Pakistan

Pilot projects for Electronic Medical Record (EMR) systems in major hospitals, starting from Islamabad, to be implemented with public-private partnership in AI and Health
The High Commission of Pakistan in London, hosted a high-level workshop on “Leveraging AI in Healthcare in Pakistan”, bringing together policy makers, AI experts, medical professionals, and academics from the UK and Pakistan.
The session was opened by the High Commissioner, who underscored the transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence to improve healthcare governance, diagnostics, electronic medical records, and medical education in Pakistan. In his pre-recorded keynote address the Federal Minister for National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination, Dr. Syed Mustafa Kamal, emphasised the need to embrace modern technologies and AI to improve public healthcare in Pakistan. In his remarks, Dr. Zubir Ahmed MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the UK Department of Health and Social Care, shared UK’s experience in integrating innovation and AI to enhance health equity and access.

A distinguished line-up of speakers spoke on a range of critical themes. Mr. Abu Bakar, CEO of the Pakistan Software Export Board (PSEB), shared his vision for digital transformation and enabling health technology innovation in Pakistan. Ms. Ayesha Hussain, Data Governance Lead at University of Leeds, discussed responsible AI and data quality frameworks to ensure affordable, accessible, and high-quality healthcare delivery. Mr. Omer Butt, Co-founder of Vita Healthcare Solutions, built a case for AI use-cases that reduce waiting times and treatment delays, while addressing inequities in care delivery. Dr. Mahdi Murtaza – a young doctor – presented a pathway to leverage AI for primary care transformation in Pakistan and development of AI curriculum for medical professionals.

Dr. Suhail Chughtai, Clinical Director for Orthopaedics & Trauma, London, and AI Division Chair at UK Digital Health & Care, spoke about developing an AI-enabled Electronic Medical Records (EMR) system for Pakistan. Professor Jawwad Arshad Darr, Vice Dean of Enterprise at UCL’s MAPS Faculty and Co-founder of UPSIGN, presented strategies for training and developing academic capacity for AI research in Pakistan. Dr. Shahid Latif, Chair of the British Pakistani Psychiatrists Association, focused on AI in mental health care, while Ms. Zehra Shah, CEO of OPEN London, spoke about responsible AI in healthcare and its ethical implications. The discussion concluded with Mr. Rehman Qamar, Chief Project Officer at NADRA, who highlighted how NADRA’s citizen database could underpin secure, scalable digital health systems and EMR integration in Pakistan.
Participants agreed on several key outcomes, including the need for a national AI-enabled health data strategy, public-private partnership in AI and Health, the piloting of EMR systems in major hospitals, and the development of AI training curricula for medical professionals. They noted that building a Responsible AI Framework in Healthcare, which embeds Responsible AI principles into AI Applications and processes, was a must. They also agreed to re-convene to discuss other aspects of AI in healthcare in coming days.
The High Commissioner reaffirmed its commitment to present these recommendations to the stakeholders in Islamabad, ensuring that Pakistan could harness AI to deliver better healthcare for every citizen.
London, 24th September 2025
Pakistan News
Pakistan’s Voice of Conscience at the United Nations

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : In the crowded halls of diplomacy, where words often drown in endless speeches, moments arise that define not only the speaker but the nation behind him. Such a moment recently came when Pakistan’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Ambassador Asim Iftikhar, stood before the world and dismantled Israel’s attempt to misuse Pakistan’s sacrifices in the fight against terrorism to justify its indiscriminate assault on Gaza. His intervention not only forced an unprecedented apology from Israel’s ambassador, Danny Danon, but also reaffirmed Pakistan’s moral authority as the voice of conscience for the Muslim world and for oppressed people everywhere.
For me, this triumph was not just a matter of national pride but also personal reflection. Two years ago, while waiting for an audience with President Arif Alvi in Islamabad, I met Ambassador Asim Iftikhar as he prepared to assume his responsibilities as Pakistan’s envoy to France. In those quiet minutes, I found him to be articulate, deeply thoughtful, and radiating professionalism. There was in his demeanor a rare blend of intellectual precision and quiet confidence, qualities that I felt would take him far in representing Pakistan. That impression, formed in the corridors of the presidency, has since been vindicated in the most remarkable way, culminating in his recent performance at the United Nations where he shone not only as Pakistan’s voice but as the spokesperson of the Muslim world.
The confrontation that revealed his strength of character unfolded when the Israeli ambassador attempted to draw an analogy between Israel’s bombardment of Gaza and the U.S. operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, which killed Osama bin Laden. It was a deliberate distortion, intended to cloak genocide in the language of counterterrorism, and it invoked Pakistan’s history in a way that was both misleading and offensive. Ambassador Iftikhar rose with words that pierced the façade. He reminded the world that Pakistan had been a frontline state in the global fight against terrorism, losing more than seventy thousand men, women, and children, dismantling terror networks, and rendering sacrifices unmatched by any other nation. “Pakistan’s record,” he declared, “is bright, recognized worldwide, and written in the blood of its martyrs.” He then turned the analogy on its head, pointing out with clarity that invoking Pakistan’s sacrifices to justify the mass killing of innocents in Gaza was “outrageous, incoherent, and morally indefensible,” for what Israel was doing was not counterterrorism but genocide, ethnic cleansing, and the conversion of Gaza into a slaughterhouse.
The chamber fell silent. Rarely does rhetoric give way to truth so powerfully, and rarely is propaganda so effectively exposed. The weight of his words left Israel’s representative cornered, and in a rare act of contrition, Danny Danon publicly apologized to Pakistan, admitting that invoking its name had been inappropriate. It was more than a diplomatic win; it was a narrative triumph, a moment where Pakistan’s honor was defended, its sacrifices acknowledged, and Israel’s distortion dismantled. For Pakistan, it was a reminder of the power of words when spoken with conviction, and for the Muslim world, it was proof that a principled voice could still rise above the noise of power politics.
This intervention was not an isolated act but part of a larger continuum of Ambassador Iftikhar’s work. Again and again at the United Nations, he has projected the suffering of Gaza and the West Bank with unflinching clarity. In June this year, he declared before the General Assembly that “the situation in Gaza is a stain on our collective conscience. Over fifty-five thousand lives have been lost, including eighteen thousand children and twenty-eight thousand women. Infrastructure has been razed—homes, hospitals, schools, cultural heritage, places of worship. Famine looms. Humanitarian workers and UN personnel are being attacked with impunity. This is not just a humanitarian catastrophe; it is a collapse of humanity.” These were not the words of a man speaking only for Pakistan. They were the words of a diplomat mobilizing the conscience of the world, urging not only the Muslim community but all of civilization to act, to recognize that without justice there can be no peace. He has repeatedly called for the only viable solution: the realization of a two-state solution on pre-1967 borders, with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as the capital of a sovereign, independent, and contiguous State of Palestine.
By vividly describing demolished schools, destroyed hospitals, displaced families, starving children, and the blockade of humanitarian aid, he has carried the Palestinian tragedy from the rubble of Gaza to the chambers of the United Nations, where it cannot be ignored. He has mobilized not just the Muslim world but also neutral states, civil society, and even hesitant Western capitals to rethink their silence. His interventions have contributed to the momentum behind resolutions in the General Assembly, including Pakistan’s pivotal role in the historic vote affirming the two-state solution, a success story of multilateral diplomacy where Pakistan once again played a leading role.
His diplomacy is marked by dignity. In confronting Israel, he did not descend into anger or hyperbole. Instead, he marshaled facts, invoked moral clarity, and exposed propaganda with surgical precision. He reminded the world that the fight against terrorism cannot be equated with the slaughter of innocent civilians, and in doing so, he not only defended Pakistan’s honor but also gave voice to the millions of Palestinians trapped under bombardment and occupation. His words carried the weight of truth, and truth compelled even Israel, often shielded by its allies, to apologize.
This was Pakistan at its finest—firm, dignified, principled. It was not just defending its own history but championing the cause of justice for Palestine, exposing tyranny, and mobilizing the conscience of the world. For me, watching this unfold brought back that first impression I had of him in Islamabad, a man destined to leave his mark. He has not only fulfilled that promise but exceeded it, standing tall as a diplomat whose words moved nations and whose voice gave hope to the oppressed.
The United Nations may often be a theater of speeches with little consequence, but sometimes, words alter the moral landscape. Through Ambassador Asim Iftikhar, Pakistan has shown that truth, when spoken with conviction, can silence distortion, compel apologies, and remind the world that dignity and justice still matter. In that chamber, Pakistan’s voice was heard and respected. It was the voice of a nation that has suffered and sacrificed, yet continues to stand for justice—not only for itself but for all oppressed peoples. And in that moment, Pakistan reminded the world that diplomacy, at its best, is not about power but about conscience, and that conscience, when articulated with courage, can still shake the foundations of injustice.
Pakistan News
Ambassador Mumtaz Zahra Baloch Meet The Pakistani Students In France

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY):- Ambassador Mumtaz Zahra Baloch held an interactive session with a group of Pakistani students in France. The Ambassador listened to the views and concerns of Pakistani students and outlined the various initiatives of the Government of Pakistan to support overseas Pakistanis.


She underscored the important role of Pakistani students and academia in promoting Pakistan-France relations and encouraged them to act as a cultural bridge between the two societies.
-
Europe News7 months ago
Chaos and unproven theories surround Tates’ release from Romania
-
American News7 months ago
Trump Expels Zelensky from the White House
-
American News7 months ago
Trump expands exemptions from Canada and Mexico tariffs
-
American News7 months ago
Zelensky bruised but upbeat after diplomatic whirlwind
-
Art & Culture7 months ago
The Indian film showing the bride’s ‘humiliation’ in arranged marriage
-
Art & Culture7 months ago
International Agriculture Exhibition held in Paris
-
Politics7 months ago
Worst violence in Syria since Assad fall as dozens killed in clashes
-
Politics7 months ago
US cuts send South Africa’s HIV treatment ‘off a cliff’