Connect with us

Pakistan News

After Aerial Humiliation, Panicked India Bombed Its Own People

Published

on

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : In one of the most stunning and deeply troubling incidents of modern military conflict, the May 2025 India-Pakistan escalation has not only exposed the weakness of Indian air superiority but has also brought to light a catastrophic failure in India’s missile command and control infrastructure. In an unprecedented embarrassment, several ballistic missiles fired by the Indian military reportedly landed within its own territory—specifically in Indian-administered Kashmir and East Punjab—causing damage, death, and widespread panic.
While Indian media outlets initially attempted to blame these explosions on Pakistani strikes, independent intelligence sources, local reports, and even intercepted communication within Indian military channels revealed the horrifying truth: these were Indian missiles, misfired or misdirected due to systemic failures in guidance systems, lack of coordination, or possibly human error. It is a stark reminder that the world’s largest democracy, which possesses over 170 nuclear warheads, operates with a missile infrastructure plagued by flaws that could have global consequences.
The story doesn’t end with missiles gone rogue. Earlier in the week, Pakistan successfully downed five Indian fighter jets, including three Rafale aircraft—France’s pride, and India’s most advanced multirole fighters. But the embarrassment did not stop at the downing itself; what shook global military experts was the fact that these Rafales were shot down not by any American stealth technology or Russian SAM systems—but by Chinese-made J-10C and JF-17 Thunder jets, operated by Pakistani pilots with surgical precision.
A French defense analyst, when asked how the technologically inferior Chinese platforms could destroy such advanced jets, offered a brutally honest assessment: “We provided the platform. But platforms require skill to operate. That we could not supply to Indian pilots.”
The statement encapsulates the broader dysfunction in India’s military command. Despite heavy investments in advanced platforms, India’s air force continues to be undermined by under-trained personnel, politicized promotions, and insufficient real-combat exposure—particularly compared to Pakistan, whose forces are battle-hardened from two decades of asymmetric and conventional warfare.
The gravest development, however, is the recent missile misfires that have turned India’s own weapons on its people. At least two ballistic missiles, reportedly launched during retaliatory salvos aimed at Pakistani positions, veered off course and exploded within Indian territory. In the immediate aftermath, chaos erupted across Indian-controlled Kashmir and East Punjab, with local hospitals overwhelmed by casualties. Indian media, in a desperate attempt to save face, labeled these attacks as Pakistani provocations—but those claims quickly unraveled.
Pakistan, for its part, categorically denied launching any such strikes and emphasized that its military doctrine does not target civilian populations, especially in areas where it shares deep religious and political sympathies, such as among Kashmiri Muslims and Khalistani Sikhs. More importantly, Pakistani intelligence intercepted and traced the origin of the misfires back to Indian launch sites—corroborated by eyewitness accounts, trajectory tracking, and analysis by third-party observers.
This is not the first time India has humiliated itself through missile mishandling. In 2022, an Indian missile accidentally landed in Pakistan during a “routine maintenance error,” prompting a major diplomatic protest. Then too, India failed to notify its own neighbors in real-time—highlighting a command structure fraught with negligence and poor oversight.
Now, with multiple self-inflicted missile strikes during an active war, the stakes are no longer regional—they’re global.
India’s nuclear capability places it in a high-stakes category where even a minor miscalculation can trigger regional or global catastrophe. Its inability to ensure missile accuracy and its failure to maintain control over its ballistic arsenal demands urgent international scrutiny.
Global watchdogs, including the United Nations Security Council, should urgently convene to impose technical and procedural safeguards on India’s missile testing and deployment systems. Countries like the United States, Russia, and China—regardless of their rivalries—must agree on inspection protocols for South Asia’s missile networks, particularly India’s, to prevent an unintentional nuclear escalation.
If a ballistic missile designed to hit strategic enemy targets instead kills civilians within India, what assurance is there that a future “mistake” won’t hit Karachi, Kabul, or even Moscow?
In stark contrast to India’s series of disasters, Pakistan’s armed forces have demonstrated remarkable professionalism, agility, and strategic foresight throughout the ongoing conflict. The Pakistan Air Force, employing advanced Chinese PL-15 long-range air-to-air missiles, showcased its superior targeting capabilities by neutralizing India’s Rafales—arguably the crown jewel of its air fleet.
Despite being outnumbered and often underestimated, Pakistan’s JF-17 Thunders and J-10Cs have shown tactical supremacy due to better coordination, superior training, and modern Chinese integration protocols. The F-16 fleet, backed by American avionics and enhanced radar systems, played a pivotal role in electronic warfare, disrupting Indian communications and reducing the efficacy of their missions.
Pakistan’s missile corps has remained restrained, precise, and strategically calibrated. No misfires. No civilian casualties. No violations of its own sovereignty. Its restraint has earned it not only strategic ground but also diplomatic credibility.
This war has become a revealing lens through which to judge the operational readiness and ethical responsibility of two nuclear-armed neighbors. India, despite its vast military budget and foreign acquisitions, is now viewed with suspicion and concern—not just by its enemies, but by its allies.
Its Air Force, once touted as a regional juggernaut, has been humbled. Its missile command, often paraded as indomitable, is now a subject of memes, diplomatic concern, and potential UN scrutiny. And its leadership, in attempting to outgun and outmaneuver Pakistan, has stumbled into self-inflicted chaos.
On the other hand, Pakistan has played a calculated hand—militarily and diplomatically. By combining indigenous innovation, foreign partnership with China, and disciplined strategy, it has not only defended its sovereignty but also earned a moral and tactical upper hand.
India’s air strikes and missile barrages may have been intended to send a message to Pakistan—but the only recipients of its destruction so far have been its own citizens and its international reputation.
As missiles rained down on Indian soil—fired not by foreign hands but its own—the world must now reconsider the narrative of regional responsibility. The future of South Asian stability will not be secured through unchecked military parades, but through accountability, training, and respect for the immense power nations wield.
The missile that strikes your enemy may start a war. But the missile that strikes your own heart may end your credibility forever.

Pakistan News

PM Shehbaz again thanks Trump for ‘bold and decisive leadership’ in brokering Pak-India ceasefire

Published

on

By

Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Saturday, once again, thanked the “bold and decisive leadership” of US President Donald Trump for brokering a ceasefire between Pakistan and India during the conflict between the two nuclear neighbours in May.

While addressing Azerbaijan’s Victory Day parade in Baku, the premier praised President Trump’s exemplary leadership, which led to the success of the peace efforts.

“It was President Trump’s, bold and decisive leadership, that brought about, the ceasefire, between Pakistan and India, restoring peace in South Asia — averting a major war, and saving millions of people.”

In his speech, the PM reiterated that Pakistan, “just like their Azerbaijani and Turkish brothers”, seeks peace, adding that no one can ever be allowed to challenge its sovereignty or undermine its territorial integrity.

The premier recalled that the Azerbaijani and Turkish military contingents had “proudly” marched alongside the Pakistani armed forces in Islamabad amid tremendous applause on August 14 this year, when they celebrated ‘Marka-i-Haq’ to commemorate their “historic victory” in the four-day war with India.

The Pakistan Army had named the period of conflict with India from the April 22 Pahalgam attack to the May 10 conclusion of Operation Bunyanum Marsoos as “Marka-i-Haq” in May.

PM Shehbaz highlighted how, five years ago, “the courageous sons of Azerbaijan, under the bold and visionary leadership of President Ilham Aliyev, rose to respond to the call of history”.

“The world witnessed in awe as Azerbaijan’s brave armed forces liberated their ancestral lands of majestic Karabakh,” the PM stated. “Throughout this entire struggle for liberation, Pakistan stood like a rock with its brotherly country Azerbaijan.”

According to PM Shehbaz, Azerbaijan’s victory in Karabakh was a “glorious vindication” of a just cause and a beacon of hope for all nations striving for sovereignty and self-determination, including the brave and resilient people of Gaza and Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir.

The prime minister arrived in Baku on Friday for a two-day official visit to Azerbaijan at Aliyev’s invitation and to attend the country’s Victory Day ceremony.

Referring to the recent flare up with the Afghan Taliban regime, the prime minister said that their common resolve for peace has most recently been tested in the case of Afghanistan and expressed gratitude to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan as well as to Emir of Qatar Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani for their “invaluable contribution” in facilitating, the peace efforts, between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

“This is a true reflection of the strong and time-tested fraternal ties between our countries that stand together, through thick and thin,“ he opined.

Victory Day is observed to “commemorate the historic victory in the 44-day-long Karabakh Liberation War against Armenia”, according to the PM’s Office.

Continue Reading

Pakistan News

Bill for 27th Constitutional Amendment tabled in Senate after federal cabinet’s approval

Published

on

By

Shortly after getting approval from the federal cabinet, the bill for the 27th Constitutional Amendment was tabled before the Senate on Saturday and subsequently referred to the standing committees on law and justice.

A joint session of both the NA and Senate standing committees on law and justice was then summoned to discuss the amendment.

However, during the session of the standing committees, two Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) members, Aliya Kamran and Senator Kamran Murtaza, boycotted the meeting and said the proposed draft included amendments that were discarded in the 26th Amendment bill.

Following deliberations on the proposed amendment, the law committees of both Houses adjourned the moot till Sunday.

‘Discussions will continue till consensus is reached’

Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar, speaking to the media after the adjournment of the committees, said all parties were participating in the session and they had also “requested the opposition to participate”.

“Aliya Kamran had informed us that they have instructions from their party not to attend the session; however, all other parties were in attendance. We even asked the opposition to be a part of the session.”

Tarar said the “long-awaited” proposed amendment has been in discussion for the last 10-15 years. “Even today we are having a constructive debate on the matter.”

“At the time of the 18th Amendment, it was on the constitutional agenda, and even earlier, during the 26th Amendment, but due to certain reasons, one of which was Maulana Fazlur Rehman’s suggestion that such a major change should not be made and that it would be better to move towards transition and form constitutional benches,” said Tarar.

The law minister elaborated that the formation of the benches increased the workload of the judiciary, as the same judges were hearing cases fixed for the bench and otherwise.

“The objective was to ensure that the cases fixed in the Supreme Court are not delayed further and the common man gets relief.”

Tarar added that one of the aims of the proposed changes is also to do away with the criticism of a “court within a court”. “All members have reviewed it (proposed constitutional amendment) and we have completed arguments on around 60pc of the clauses.”

The law minister said a few questions have been raised by some members, clarifying that they are legal in nature and “not fundamental issues”.

“We will reconvene again tomorrow morning at 11am and continue our discussions. And till the time we do not reach a consensus, from all members of both Houses, the discussions will continue,” said the law minister.

The Senate and standing committee sessions will resume on Sunday, November 9.

Farooq H. Naek said no decision has been reached yet after deliberations on the proposed constitutional amendment, and claimed around 80pc of the bill was discussed.

He added that certain “mistakes” in the draft will be corrected and the law ministry has been made aware.

When asked about changes to Article 243, he said it was not discussed during today’s session.

Tarar tables bill in Senate

The bill, which was tabled in the Senate by the law minister, proposed the formation of a Federal Constitutional Court, changes in the process for appointing high court judges, changes to the threshold for provincial cabinets, and changes to the military leadership structure.

At the outset of the session, Tarar — who had earlier in the day briefed the media on some features of the proposed legislation after the federal cabinet meeting — requested the suspension of the question hour and other house business so he could brief lawmakers on the amendment.

The law minister then moved the bill before the upper house, with Chairman Yousuf Raza Gillani referring it to the National Assembly and Senate standing committees on law and justice for review and consideration. He said that both committees may hold joint meetings for a detailed review and consideration, and the report would be presented before the House.

Continue Reading

Pakistan News

PTI, Imran should ‘take a step back’; govt should create space for engagement: Fawad

Published

on

By

Former PTI leader Fawad Chaudhry said on Monday that both the government and the PTI, along with Imran Khan, need to show flexibility in order to create space for engagement to decrease the political friction in the country.

Fawad is one of the three former PTI leaders who say they have been engaging with the party’s incarcerated leadership to put an end to politics of confrontation as part of their political outreach initiative.

They also visited PTI leader Shah Mahmood Qureshi, after he was taken to a hospital in Lahore from prison, on Thursday, to convince him to join their campaign.

“I’ve said this from the first day, the government should move one step forward and the PTI and Imran Khan should move back one step so space is created,” said the former PTI leader while speaking during an interview on DawnNewsTV show ‘News Wise’.

He maintained that both sides would have to decide on the need to bring down the temperature, warning that if the PTI did not pursue engagement and talks, it would face similar treatment as the disbanding and ban on the proscribed Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan.

“The government needs this, because whatever international successes they have gained are not translating into Pakistan … so both sides need the temperature to come down. We think the leaders of Lahore should play the role of a pivot and take this forward.”

Chaudhry added that the immediate need was to lower the political temperature, saying talks could not proceed if both sides could not even bear to see each other.

Defending his former party’s obstinacy against engagement in talks, he said it was also due to the behaviour of the government, which had made a policy of “crushing and sidelining” the opposition.

“The two ruling parties, the establishment and the PTI, are the four big players and the political temperature between them should come down. How will that happen? …you will have to give the leadership in Lahore’s jail the chance to talk to Imran Khan.”

He further said that the establishment and the government needed to decide whether the country needed a reduction in political temperature or not. “I am very hopeful they have this view too.”

Referring to the group’s recent activities, Chaudhry said they had a meeting of at least 45 minutes with Qureshi.

He added that the proposal being carried by the group was not even their own, instead pointing to a letter by incarcerated PTI leaders in Lahore earlier this year, which called for a reduction in political friction and encouraged engagement.

Chaudhry was not without criticism for the government, saying it had backed the PTI into a corner. “If you don’t engage with the PTI, the only way forward it has is to protest,” he said.

The former federal minister added that in such a situation, the PTI could lead a protest to Islamabad and resign from the National Assembly, while the government would attempt to impose governor’s rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, which would be resisted by the party.

“Another event like November 26, 2024, will happen, and as a result of this, the tensions and political temperature in Pakistan will increase. The problem right now is that, we the people, living in Pakistan are being severely impacted by this,” he said, adding that the group had requested the incarcerated PTI leaders in Lahore that if there was no implementation of their earlier recommendation, it would lead to great loss for both the party and the government.

He also said the fact that the group was allowed to meet the incarcerated PTI leadership in Kot Lakpat jail was an encouraging sign.

“Senior government ministers called me and appreciated the effort,” he said, pointing to Information Minister Attaullah Tarar’s welcoming of the development in particular.

“Senior PTI leadership also called and said that this is the only way.”

Continue Reading

Trending