Connect with us

American News

Trump’s Trade Triumph, Europe’s Strategic Liberation

Published

on

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : Donald Trump may have returned from Scotland declaring a sweeping economic triumph, but it is Europe that came away with something far more valuable: the right to think and act freely. Beneath the glittering headlines of tariff eliminations and multi-billion-dollar commitments, the summit at Turnberry marked the quiet collapse of U.S. geopolitical dominance over its allies. While Trump boasted of $750 billion in energy exports, $600 billion in European investment, and unspecified billions in future military hardware sales, the European Union and the United Kingdom handed him economic satisfaction in exchange for something they had long been denied—independence from American-Israeli coercion.
This shift is not symbolic—it is structural. By agreeing to one-sided economic terms, Europe has secured the room to walk its own path in diplomacy, human rights, and foreign policy. That freedom has already begun to manifest. Several EU states have either recognized or pledged to recognize the State of Palestine. France’s President Emmanuel Macron announced that his government will formally support Palestinian statehood at the United Nations General Assembly, directly contradicting Washington’s position. Europe’s newfound voice is no longer an accident. It is the result of a deliberate decision to exchange financial concessions for moral autonomy.
But to understand this pivot, one must also confront a darker, deeper truth about the state of U.S. leadership. The unwavering support that American presidents, congressmen, and cabinet officials give to Israel—despite its brutal military operations in Gaza and the West Bank—is not merely ideological. It is, increasingly, understood by European circles as coerced compliance. According to well-placed intelligence disclosures and political whispers, Israeli intelligence agencies, including Mossad, have accumulated irrefutable evidence—videos, photographs, and documentation—of sexual misconduct involving underage girls by senior U.S. officials, including Donald Trump himself. These materials, long held in classified archives, serve as a tool of total control.
In this light, the blind repetition of Israeli talking points by American leaders is no longer confusing—it is revealing. When Netanyahu claims that Hamas is responsible for civilian deaths, or that Israel is feeding Palestinians while Hamas steals and starves them, U.S. officials recite the narrative without question, despite overwhelming global evidence to the contrary. Trump’s own declaration that “we’re going to finish the job in Gaza and the West Bank” was not a defense of policy—it was a scripted line passed down from Tel Aviv. The absurdity of the narrative—where a heavily bombed, blockaded civilian population continues to “fool the world” while under total Israeli surveillance—is so farcical it can only persist through fear and blackmail.
European leaders now understand this. And they have drawn a line. Their populations, increasingly educated, conscious, and defiant, no longer tolerate their governments being accomplices to genocide. Informed by alternative media, global witness reports, and humanitarian voices, European societies are demanding truth and accountability. The recognition of Palestine is not just a political gesture—it is a moral revolt against the rotting credibility of American leadership, compromised at its core.
This is why Europe no longer aligns blindly with U.S. foreign policy. The old days—when Washington led and Brussels followed—are over. From Iraq to Libya to Lebanon, Europe has seen what blind obedience to U.S. militarism leads to: collapsed states, radicalized populations, and endless suffering. Now, even as they feed American economic interests through trade and investment, European governments are decoupling from Washington’s destructive geopolitical agenda.
Trump’s trade agreement has made this detachment possible. By eliminating tariffs on key U.S. products and offering a guaranteed market for American energy and weapons, Europe has bought the right to dissent. They gave Trump what he wanted—money, markets, and a photo op—in order to free themselves from decades of ideological and military subjugation. This is the essence of the new transatlantic dynamic: pay to walk away.
And it could not come at a more urgent time. Over 70,000 Palestinians—mostly civilians, including women and children—have died in Gaza. The West Bank is being annexed inch by inch under the fog of war. Snipers, starvation tactics, and displacement policies have become the Israeli tools of ethnic cleansing, while the United States stands not as an observer, but as a partner. Aid convoys are blocked, journalists are silenced, and the world’s conscience is shaken. Yet Trump and the Washington elite cling to the claim that it is Hamas stealing the aid, killing their own people, and using children as human shields. This grotesque inversion of reality is not a miscalculation. It is the price of silence paid by those whose secrets are buried in Israeli vaults.
For Europe, this recognition has become a turning point. The realization that the most powerful nation on Earth is being manipulated by a foreign government through political blackmail has shattered the myth of American moral leadership. The EU and UK now see that siding with the United States means inheriting its shame. Instead, they have chosen to distance themselves—not in anger, but in survival.
Even Britain, once Washington’s closest ally, is showing signs of divergence. Parliamentarians across the spectrum are calling for investigations into Israeli war crimes and for halting arms shipments. What was once unthinkable is now politically inevitable. Across Europe, the tide is turning—from Stockholm to Madrid, from Berlin to Dublin.
This is not just political evolution. It is moral resurrection. Europe has realized that being allied with the United States no longer means standing with freedom, justice, or truth. It means endorsing genocide, shielding war criminals, and being complicit in the slow, deliberate erasure of a people. The trade agreement, as one-sided as it may appear on paper, has become Europe’s ticket to redemption.
Trump will parade the deal as a win for American exporters, energy giants, and defense contractors. And indeed, U.S. goods will now flood European markets. American military hardware will find new buyers in EU defense ministries. Liquefied natural gas will power European homes. But what America has lost in the process—its ability to command respect, to dictate values, to lead with integrity—is far greater than any tariff gain.
Europe has not just exited America’s economic orbit—it has escaped its moral vacuum. And in doing so, it has emerged not weaker, but stronger, not as a junior partner, but as a sovereign collective. This is not the end of the alliance. It is the beginning of a new, equal relationship—one where truth is not blackmailed, where justice is not bartered, and where freedom is no longer for sale.

American News

‘The bodies just kept coming’ – photographer at deadly Rio police raid

Published

on

By

A photographer who witnessed the aftermath of a massive Brazilian police operation in Rio de Janeiro has told the BBC of how residents came back with mutilated bodies of those who had died.

The bodies “kept coming: 25, 30, 35, 40, 45…”, Bruno Itan told BBC Brasil. They included those of police officers.

One of the bodies had been decapitated – others were “totally disfigured”, he said. Many also had what he says were stab wounds.

More than 120 people were killed during Tuesday’s raid on a criminal gang – the deadliest such raid in the city.

Bruno Itan told BBC Brasil that he was first alerted to the raid early on Tuesday by residents of the Alemão neighbourhood, who sent him messages telling him there was a shoot-out.

The photographer made his way to the Getúlio Vargas hospital, where the bodies were arriving.

Itan says that the police stopped members of the press from entering the Penha neighboorhood, where the operation was under way.

“Police officers formed a line and said: ‘The press doesn’t get past here.'”

But Itan, who grew up in the area, says he was able to make his way into the cordoned-off area, where he remained until the next morning.

He says that Tuesday night, local residents began to search the hillside which divides Penha from the nearby Alemão neighbourhood for relatives who had been missing since the police raid.

Bruno Itan Around two dozen residents of Penha search a hillside for people who went missing after a police raid. Some of them are looking down what looks like a ravine, while others are walking.

Residents of the Penha neighbourhood proceeded to place the recovered bodies in a square – and Itan’s photos show the reaction of the people there.

“The brutality of it all impacted me a lot: the sorrow of the families, mothers fainting, pregnant wives, crying, outraged parents,” the photographer recalled.

Bruno Itan A group of people - many of them women - look at the ground where bodies have been placed. One man is covering his mouth with his T-shirt. A woman is grabbing the shoulders of the woman in front of her and is crying.
There was shock in Penha as locals retrieved more and more bodies from the nearby hillside

The governor of Rio state said that the massive police operation involving around 2,500 security personnel was aimed at stopping a criminal group known as Comando Vermelho (Red Command) from expanding its territory.

Initially, the Rio state government maintained that “60 suspects and four police officers” had been killed in the operation.

They have since said that their “preliminary” count shows that 117 “suspects” have been killed.

Rio’s public defender’s office, which provides legal assistance to the poor, has put the total number of people killed at 132.

According to researchers, Red Command is the only criminal group which in recent years has managed to make territorial gains in the state of Rio de Janeiro.

It is widely considered one of the two largest gangs in the country, alongside First Capital Command (PCC), and has a history dating back more than 50 years.

According to Brazilian journalist Rafael Soares, who has been covering crime in Rio for years, Red Command “operates like a franchise” with local criminal leaders forming part of the gang and becoming “business partners”.

The gang engages primarily in drug trafficking, but also smuggles guns, gold, fuel, alcohol and tobacco.

According to the authorities, gang members are well armed and police said that during the raid, they came under attack from explosive-laden drones.

The governor of Rio state, Cláudio Castro, described Red Command members as “narcoterrorists” and called the four police officers killed in the raid “heroes”.

But the number of people killed in the operation has come in for criticism with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights saying it was “horrified”.

At a news conference on Wednesday, Governor Castro defended the police force.

“It wasn’t our intention to kill anyone. We wanted to arrest them all alive,” he said.

He added that the situation had escalated because the suspects had retaliated: “It was a consequence of the retaliation they carried out and the disproportionate use of force by those criminals.”

The governor also said that the bodies displayed by locals in Penha had been “manipulated”.

In a post on X, he said that some of them had been stripped of the camouflage clothing he said they had been wearing “in order to shift blame onto the police”.

Felipe Curi of Rio’s civil police force also said that “camouflage clothing, vests, and weapons” had been removed from the bodies and showed footage appearing to show a man cutting camouflage clothing off a corpse.

Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has summoned Governor Castro to a hearing on Monday to explain the police actions “in detail”.

Continue Reading

American News

Trump’s Asia tour sees deals, knee-bending and a revealing final meeting

Published

on

By

US presidential trips abroad have traditionally been an opportunity to display the power of the American nation on the world stage. Donald Trump’s five-day swing through eastern Asia, on the other hand, has been a display of the power of Trump – but also, at times, of that power’s limitations.

Trump’s stops in Malaysia, Japan and South Korea over the course of the first four days were an exercise in pleasing a sometimes mercurial American president. It was an acknowledgement that Trump, with the flick of a pen, could impose tariffs and other measures that have the potential to devastate the economies of export-dependent nations.

His sit-down with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Thursday, however, was something entirely different.

It was a meeting of equals on the global stage, where the stakes for both nations – for their economies, for their international prestige, for the welfare of their people – were enormous.

With China, Trump may flick his pen, but such actions come with consequences. They come with a cost.

For the first four days, Trump’s most recent foray into global diplomacy was smooth sailing.

Each stop was punctuated by a blend of traditional trade negotiations – deals made under the shadow of Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs – and personal accommodations that at times bordered on the obsequious.

In Malaysia, Trump secured access to critical minerals and made progress toward finalising trade arrangements with south-east Asian nations. He also presided over a treaty that should ease border tensions between Thailand and Cambodia – the kind of “peace deal” the American president loves to tout.

In Japan, Trump’s Marine One flew past a Tokyo Tower lit red, white and blue – with a top in Trumpian gold.

Newly elected Prime Minister Sanai Takaichi detailed $550bn in Japanese investments in the US and offered the American president a gift of 250 cherry trees for America’s 250th birthday, and a golf club and bag that belonged to Shinzo Abe, the assassinated former prime minister who bonded with Trump in his first term.

She also became the latest foreign leader to nominate Trump for his much-desired Nobel Peace Prize.

Not to be outdone, South Korea welcomed Trump with artillery firing a 21-gun salute and a military band that played Hail to the Chief and YMCA – the Village People song that has become a Trump rally anthem.

President Lee Jae Myung held an “honour ceremony” for Trump during which he gave the American leader his nation’s highest medal and a replica of an ancient Korean dynastic crown.

Lunch with Lee featured a “Peacemaker’s Dessert” of gold-encrusted brownies. Later that day, the Koreans served Trump vineyard wine at an intimate dinner in Trump’s honour with six world leaders attending the Asia-Pacific Economic Conference summit.

Continue Reading

American News

Trump caps refugee admissions at 7,500 – mostly white South Africans

Published

on

By

The Trump administration will limit the number of refugees admitted to the US to 7,500, and give priority to white South Africans.

The move, announced in a notice published on Thursday, will apply for the next fiscal year and marks a dramatic cut from the previous limit of 125,000 set by former President Joe Biden.

No reason was given for the cut, but the notice said it was “justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest”.

In January 2025, Trump signed an executive order suspending the US Refugee Admissions Programme, or USRAP, which he said would allow US authorities to prioritise national security and public safety.

The notice posted to the website of the Federal Register said the 7,500 admissions would “primarily” be allocated to Afrikaner South Africans and “other victims of illegal or unjust discrimination in their respective homelands”.

In the Oval Office in May, Trump criticised South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and claimed white farmers in his nation were being killed and “persecuted”.

The White House also played a video which they said showed burial sites for murdered white farmers. Trump said he did not know where in South Africa the scene was filmed.

The tense meeting came just days after the US granted asylum to 60 Afrikaners. It later emerged that the videos were scenes from a 2020 protest in which the crosses represented farmers killed over multiple years.

On his first day in office on 20 January, Trump said the US would suspend USRAP to reflect the US’s lack of “ability to absorb large numbers of migrants, and in particular, refugees, into its communities in a manner that does not compromise the availability of resources for Americans” and “protects their safety and security”.

The US policy of accepting white South Africans has already prompted accusations of unfair treatment from refugee advocacy groups.

Some have argued the US is now effectively shut to other persecuted groups or people facing potential harm in their home country, and even former allies that helped US forces in Afghanistan or the Middle East.

“This decision doesn’t just lower the refugee admissions ceiling,” Global Refuge CEO and president Krish O’Mara Vignarajah said on Thursday. “It lowers our moral standing.”

“At a time of crisis in countries ranging from Afghanistan to Venezuela to Sudan and beyond, concentrating the vast majority of admissions on one group undermines the programme’s purpose as well as its credibility,” she added.

The South African government has yet to respond to the latest announcement.

During the Oval Office meeting, President Ramaphosa said only that he hoped that Trump officials would listen to South Africans about the issue, and later said he believed there is “doubt and disbelief about all this in [Trump’s] head”.

Continue Reading

Trending