Connect with us

World News

The U.S. Sanctions on Francesca Backfired

Published

on

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : In a jarring move that sent shockwaves across the globe, the United States imposed sanctions on Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, accusing her of “systematic demonization” of the U.S. But behind this vague allegation lies a disturbing truth: Albanese’s real “offense” was exposing the industrial economy of genocide—one fueled not just by the Israeli government but by a vast network of corporations, hedge funds, universities, and pension systems across the West.
Her latest report, “The Economy of Genocide,” and a subsequent viral interview laid bare the machinery of death behind the war on Gaza. She revealed how weapons manufacturers, bulldozer suppliers, and construction conglomerates are not merely supporting genocide—they are profiting from it. Israeli bulldozers raze entire neighborhoods, while construction contracts to rebuild illegal settlements flow rapidly. For every bomb dropped, there’s a dividend earned; for every displaced family, a new high-rise emerges.
But what shocked the conscience of the global public was not merely her confirmation of genocide—it was the financial lifelines she traced. From American surveillance and cloud-computing firms to European pension funds and elite universities, Albanese exposed how deeply this war is sustained by capital flows. Norway’s Government Pension Fund alone holds over $122 billion invested in companies complicit in Israeli occupation and military operations. Similar financial trails lead to Sweden, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom.
Even Ivy League institutions like Harvard, Stanford, and NYU—often hailed for social justice advocacy—are enmeshed through opaque endowment investments and silent third-party fund managers. These universities, while professing solidarity with Palestine in student forums, funnel capital into firms that supply arms and equipment to Israeli forces.
Francesca Albanese did not stop at the economic trail. She painted an unflinching picture of Gaza’s humanitarian catastrophe. “More than 75% of those killed in Gaza and the West Bank are women and children,” she said, emphasizing that these victims cannot be labeled militants by any legal or moral standard. “Their only crime is being Palestinian.” This demographic devastation is not accidental. It is systematic, targeted, and genocidal.
Albanese called Gaza “a living textbook of genocide,” fulfilling every criterion under international law—deliberate killings, destruction of living conditions, forced displacement, and erasure of cultural identity. She described how Israeli raids have decimated Palestine’s knowledge ecosystem: universities bombed, professors assassinated, students slaughtered, libraries turned to dust. Gaza’s last remaining research centers and cultural hubs have been wiped out. It is not only the bodies, but the collective memory and future of a nation being erased.
Commerce and civil society lie in ruins. Shops, bakeries, factories, and schools have been obliterated. Gaza is left with no one to educate, to trade, or to heal. The goal is clear: to reduce an entire people to dependency, silence, or oblivion. And yet, this extermination campaign is not funded solely by Tel Aviv or condoned solely by Washington—it is driven by a war economy backed by multinational private contractors.
Security firms, tech companies, arms manufacturers, and logistics contractors have turned Gaza into a testing ground and a profit center. These corporations operate in sync with the IDF, often surpassing state authorities in reach and precision. Private surveillance firms now work alongside Mossad, analyzing data harvested by U.S.-built platforms. Francesca Albanese warned: “This is not just a war—it’s a joint venture. A business enterprise of destruction.”
She highlighted that decision-makers in boardrooms, not just war rooms, control this carnage. A faceless ecosystem of fund managers, politicians, and lobbyists keep the war alive. Private defense contractors mint money; lawmakers receive donations; media pundits get scripts. Israel’s military policy has become a business model. And what especially rattled the U.S. and Israeli establishments was Albanese’s courage in naming these links, not as bystanders but as primary beneficiaries and drivers of genocide.
The sanctions on her backfired spectacularly. Francesca Albanese became an instant global icon. Her voice, once confined to UN documents, exploded across media platforms. She became a symbol of defiance, truth, and moral clarity. “I have done my job,” she stated. “And for that, I was sanctioned. But if telling the truth is punishable, then justice is already dead.”
She revealed she had contacted 48 of the entities named in her report, offering them a right of reply. Only 15 responded—most with evasive statements. None denied the facts. None divested. “They stay in with full knowledge and full intent,” she said. “That makes them complicit.”
In her concluding message, Albanese offered not just a diagnosis but a remedy. She called for immediate divestment from Israeli-linked corporations, a complete boycott of products manufactured or distributed by complicit companies, and full transparency from universities and public institutions on their financial entanglements. Symbolic gestures are not enough, she argued—only strategic, financial, and civic disassociation from genocide will force change.
Yet, as Francesca’s voice grows louder, a larger consensus is forming across the political and analytical spectrum. Experts and former officials now agree: the key to stopping the Gaza genocide rests squarely with the United States. A policy reversal by the White House—if backed by public will—could alter the tide. President trump, or his successor, must face the moral and political reckoning of this complicity. No Israeli prime minister, not even Netanyahu, can sustain such a war without uninterrupted U.S. arms, aid, and vetoes.
Many now identify Netanyahu’s war-mongering policies as the root cause of perpetual conflict. His government must be forced, through sanctions and international legal pressure, to abandon expansionism and militarism. But there’s a third force equally dangerous: the war economy itself. Fueled by private contractors, weapon lobbies, and pro-Israel institutions like AIPAC, this machine funds lawmakers, shapes CNN and Fox coverage, and pressures legislatures globally to maintain the killing spree for profit.
The time has come for people—not governments—to act. The collective conscience of the world, including Americans, Israelis, and the global Islamic community, must rise. It is time to boycott Israeli goods, end all economic support to war profiteers, and demand democratic action from parliaments to stop the slaughter. If we remain silent now, history will not only condemn the leaders who enabled genocide—it will also judge the nations, societies, and individuals who watched, calculated, and did nothing.
Francesca Albanese showed us that genocide is no longer hidden—it’s televised, monetized, and outsourced. The question now is not whether we know, but whether we will act.

World News

Turkey host the COP31 after reaching compromise with Australia

Published

on

By

Belem (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY):- Australia will not hold next year’s UN climate summit, Australia will allow Türkiye to host COP31 next year but Australia will lead negotiations there.

Climate Minister Chris Bowen revealing Australia was willing to cede hosting rights to Türkiye in exchange for it handing him the reins of the negotiations and cementing a major role for the Pacific at the summit.

There had been a growing expectation that Australia would drop its bid to host COP31 in Adelaide as it struggled to convince Türkiye to pull out of the contest.

Under UN rules, if the two countries were unable to strike a deal, then the meeting location would automatically revert to Germany, which hosts the United Nations body responsible for the Paris Agreement.

This unusual arrangement has taken observers by surprise. It is normal for a COP president to be from the host country and how this new partnership will work in practice remains to be seen.

Despite this, there will be relief among countries currently meeting at COP30 in the Brazilian city of Belém that a compromise has been reached as the lack of agreement on the venue was becoming an embarrassment for the UN.
Australia has pushed hard to have the climate summit in the city of Adelaide, arguing that they would co-host the meeting with Pacific island states who are seen as among the most vulnerable to climate change and rising sea levels.
Turkey, which has proposed hosting COP31 in the city of Antalya, felt that they had a good claim to be the host country as they had stood aside in 2021 and allowed the UK to hold the meeting in Glasgow.
If neither country was willing to compromise then the meeting would have been held in the German city of Bonn, the headquarters of the UN’s climate body.
As a result of discussions at COP30, a compromise appears to have been reached.

This includes pre-COP meeting will be held on a Pacific island, while the main event is held in Turkey. 

Australian Minister believes having a COP president not from the host country will work and that he will have the considerable authority reserved for the president of these gatherings. As COP president of negotiations, I would have all the powers of the COP presidency to manage, to handle the negotiations, to appoint co-facilitators, to prepare draft text, to issue the cover decision,” he said.
He also confirmed to Turkey will also appoint a president who will run the venue, organise the meetings and schedules.

Australia’s climbdown will be embarrassing for the government of Mr Albanese, after lobbying long and hard to win support among the other nations in the Western Europe group.
The compromise will have to be ratified by more than 190 countries gathered here for COP30 in Belem, Brazil.

Photos @ Imran Y. CHOUDHRY

Continue Reading

World News

Titanic passenger’s watch expected to fetch £1m

Published

on

By

A gold pocket watch recovered from the body of one of the richest passengers on the Titanic is expected to fetch £1m at auction.

Isidor Straus and his wife Ida were among the more than 1,500 people who died when the vessel travelling from Southampton to New York sank after hitting an iceberg on 14 April 1912.

His body was recovered from the Atlantic days after the disaster and among his possessions was an 18 carat gold Jules Jurgensen pocket watch that will go under the hammer on 22 November.

Auctioneer Andrew Aldridge, of Henry Aldridge & Son in Wiltshire, told BBC Radio Wiltshire: “With the watch, we are retelling Isidor’s story. It’s a phenomenal piece of memorabilia.”

Mr Straus was a Bavarian-born American businessman, politician, and co-owner of Macy’s department store in New York.

“They were a very famous New York couple,” said Mr Aldridge.

“Everyone would know them from the end of James Cameron’s Titanic movie, when there is an elderly couple hugging as the ship is sinking – that’s Isidor and Ida.”

On the night of the sinking, it is believed his devoted wife refused a place in a lifeboat as she did not want to leave her husband and said she would rather die by his side.

Ida’s body was never found.

BNPS A golden watch engraved on the inside with February 6th 1888.
It is believed the watch was a gift from Ida to her husband in 1888

The pocket watch stopped at 02:20, the moment the Titanic disappeared beneath the waves.

It is believed to have been a gift from Ida to her husband in 1888 and is engraved with Straus’ initials.

It was returned to his family and was passed down through generations before Kenneth Hollister Straus, Isidor’s great-grandson, had the movement repaired and restored.

It will be sold alongside a rare letter Ida wrote aboard the liner describing its luxury.

She wrote: “What a ship! So huge and so magnificently appointed. Our rooms are furnished in the best of taste and most luxurious.”

The letter is postmarked “TransAtlantic 7” meaning it was franked on board in the Titanic’s post office before being taken off with other mail at Queenstown, Ireland.

Both items will be offered by Henry Aldridge & Son in Wiltshire, with the letter estimated to fetch £150,000.

The watch is set to become one of the most expensive Titanic artefacts ever sold.

The auction house said news of the sale had already generated “significant interest from clients all over the world”.

BNPS The letter from Ida, which is neatly written on and has an "on board RMS Titanic" stamp in the corner.
The letter by Ida is estimated to fetch £150,000

“Theirs was the ultimate love story – Isidor epitomised the American Dream, rising from humble immigrant to a titan of the New York establishment, owning Macy’s department store,” a spokesperson for the auction house said.

“As the ship was sinking, despite being offered a seat in a lifeboat, Ida refused to leave her husband and stated to him ‘Isidor we have been together all of these years, where you go, I go’.”

The spokesperson added: “This is the reason why collectors are interested in the Titanic story 113 years later – every man, woman and child had a story to tell and those stories now are retold through these objects.”

gold pocket watch presented to the captain of the Carpathia, the steamship which rescued more than 700 Titanic survivors, sold last year a record-breaking £1.56m.

Continue Reading

World News

Major corruption scandal engulfs top Zelensky allies

Published

on

By

Ukraine’s energy and justice ministers have resigned in the wake of a major investigation into corruption in the country’s energy sector.

President Volodymyr Zelensky called for Energy Minister Svitlana Grynchuk and Justice Minister Herman Halushchenko’s removal on Wednesday.

On Monday anti-corruption bodies accused several people of orchestrating a embezzlement scheme in the energy sector worth about $100m (£76m), including at the national nuclear operator Enerhoatom.

Some of those implicated in the scandal are – or have been – close associates of Zelensky’s.

The allegation is that Justice Minister Herman Halushchenko and other key ministers and officials received payments from contractors building fortifications against Russian attacks on energy infrastructure.

Among those alleged to be involved are former Deputy Prime Minister Oleksiy Chernyshov and Timur Mindich – a businessman and a co-owner of Zelensky’s former TV studio Kvartal95. He has since reportedly fled the country.

Halushchenko said he would defend himself against the accusations, while Grynchuk said on social media: “Within the scope of my professional activities there were no violations of the law.”

The National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (Nabu) and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (Sap) said the investigation – which was 15 months in the making and involved 1,000 hours of audio recordings – uncovered the participation of several members of the Ukrainian government.

According to Nabu, the people involved systematically collected kickbacks from Enerhoatom contractors worth between 10% and 15% of contract values.

The anti-corruption bodies also said the huge sums had been laundered in the scheme and published photographs of bags full of cash. The funds were then transferred outside Ukraine, including to Russia, Nabu said.

Prosecutors alleged that the scheme’s proceeds were laundered through an office in Kyiv linked to the family of former Ukrainian lawmaker and current Russian senator Andriy Derkach.

Nabu has been releasing new snippets of its investigation and wiretaps every day and on Tuesday it promised more would come.

The scandal is unfolding against the backdrop of escalating Russian attacks on Ukrainian energy facilities, including substations that supply electricity to nuclear power plants.

It will also shine a spotlight on corruption in Ukraine, which continues to be endemic despite work by Nabu and Sap in the 10 years since they were created.

In July, nationwide protests broke out over changes curbing the independence of Nabu and Sap. Ukrainians feared the nation could lose the coveted status of EU candidate country which it was granted on condition it mounted a credible fight against corruption.

Kyiv’s European partners also expressed severe alarm at the decision, with ambassadors from the G7 group of nations expressing the desire to discuss the issue with the Ukrainian leadership.

The backlash was the most severe to hit the Ukrainian government since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022 and was only quelled by Zelensky’s decision to reinstate the freedom of the two anti-corruption bodies.

Yet for some that crisis brought into question Zelensky’s dedication to anti-corruption reforms. The latest scandal threatens to lead to more awkward questions for the Ukrainian president.

Continue Reading

Trending