Pakistan News
Pakistan’s Diplomatic Gambit: A Nobel Bid for Donald Trump

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : Pakistan has announced its decision to nominate former U.S. President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his critical role in brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan during their recent four-day conflict. According to Islamabad, Trump’s diplomatic intervention prevented what could have been a devastating war between two nuclear-armed nations, whose combined population nears 1.7 billion people. The risk of escalation was not merely regional—it threatened global catastrophe. A full-blown nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan would have killed millions instantly, left countless more suffering from radiation poisoning, and potentially polluted vast areas of the planet with radioactive fallout.
In the eyes of Pakistani leadership, the ceasefire was not a result of bilateral understanding alone, but rather the outcome of behind-the-scenes pressure from Washington, led by Trump himself. His influence, they argue, tipped the strategic balance in Pakistan’s favor. The fact that India has not made a similar nomination, nor endorsed Pakistan’s proposal, suggests New Delhi may have been compelled by external pressure to agree to de-escalation—an arm-twisting it now hesitates to acknowledge. Pakistan, by contrast, sees Trump’s role as decisive, crediting him for giving diplomacy a chance and stabilizing one of the world’s most volatile flashpoints.
For Trump, this marks yet another moment where he seeks to define himself as a peacemaker. Since returning to office, he has claimed involvement in a range of peace efforts, including attempting to defuse tensions between Russia and Ukraine, proposing controversial solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and more recently, trying to mediate between Israel and Iran as hostilities in the Middle East escalate. In each of these cases, Trump has framed himself as a man of peace rather than war, a statesman who prefers deals over destruction.
However, the Nobel Peace Prize is governed by very specific criteria outlined in Alfred Nobel’s will. The prize is intended for those who have, in the preceding year, contributed most to fostering fraternity between nations, advancing disarmament or the abolition of standing armies, or organizing peace congresses. While Pakistan’s government is qualified to make the nomination, the question remains whether Trump’s actions align sufficiently with these core requirements.
Trump’s role in halting the India-Pakistan conflict may well qualify under the category of fostering fraternity between nations, at least in the narrow sense of preventing immediate escalation. However, critics argue that his interventions tend to be tactical rather than structural. The ceasefire, while significant, did not involve formal peace talks, demilitarization, or the establishment of long-term conflict-resolution mechanisms. It was a pause in hostilities, not a transformation of the underlying tensions. Similarly, his other diplomatic efforts have often lacked follow-through, institutions, or treaties that would make peace durable.
Still, Trump’s posture as a peacemaker has found fresh ground in the Middle East. As the war between Israel and Iran escalated in June 2025, Trump initiated a series of back-channel efforts to contain the conflict. He publicly called for calm, pressured both sides to explore negotiation, and sought Turkish mediation to open discreet dialogue with Iranian officials. Though Tehran initially refused to participate unless Israel halted its bombing campaign, Trump remained hopeful that diplomacy could still win the day. At the G7 summit, he reiterated his plea for restraint, urging both parties to “make a deal” and avoid dragging the region into a full-scale war.
Unlike many past U.S. presidents, Trump has taken a nuanced stance on NATO, pushing European allies to shoulder more financial responsibility. His reduced emphasis on U.S. military interventionism is consistent with his larger strategy of avoiding entanglements while leveraging diplomatic pressure. Whether this is pragmatism or isolationism is open to debate, but Pakistan clearly sees in Trump a leader who intervenes only when strategic interests and peace align.
Yet Trump’s foreign policy record is fraught with contradictions. While positioning himself as a man of peace in one region, he has actively emboldened militarism and expansionism in others. His unwavering support for Israel, despite the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza and the West Bank, has been widely condemned.
His administration’s backing of Israeli military operations—framed by many as acts of genocide against Palestinians—has undermined his peace credentials. Furthermore, his support for Israel’s continued assault on Iran and refusal to condemn aggressive preemptive strikes has placed the United States squarely on one side of an increasingly dangerous regional war.
Beyond the Middle East, Trump’s assertions to annex Canada as the 51st state, his plan to rebrand the Gulf of Mexico under American identity, his proposal to take over Greenland from Denmark, and his ambitions to militarize and control the Panama Canal and adjacent lake regions signal an aggressive geopolitical posture. These positions paint him not as a global peacemaker but as an opportunistic expansionist, eager to rewrite borders and extend American dominance through threats, deals, or force.
Despite these criticisms, Trump’s ability to stall a potential war between India and Pakistan gives him a strong talking point in the context of Nobel nominations. It adds weight to his self-characterization as a statesman who, even if unconventional, gets results. Whether the Nobel Committee shares that view is far from certain. Historically, the committee has favored leaders whose efforts culminate in formal agreements, institutional reforms, or significant steps toward disarmament—criteria that Trump has yet to meet fully.
There is, of course, a deeply political dimension to Pakistan’s nomination. By recognizing Trump in this way, Islamabad gains soft power leverage and potentially earns goodwill from one of the most powerful and polarizing leaders on the global stage. In contrast, India—smarting from what many see as a military setback—has remained diplomatically muted. Its reluctance to echo Pakistan’s praise of Trump may be born out of resentment or embarrassment. By moving first, Pakistan has repositioned itself as a diplomatic ally to the United States under Trump’s leadership, while casting India in a defensive, unresponsive role.
In conclusion, Pakistan’s nomination of Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is both a diplomatic strategy and a symbolic gesture. It serves to highlight Trump’s influence in regional stability and underscores Pakistan’s gratitude for averting a disastrous conflict. While the nomination is procedurally sound, whether it gains traction with the Nobel Committee depends on how they interpret Trump’s peace initiatives. If short-term conflict prevention is deemed sufficient, Trump could emerge as a serious contender. If the bar remains high—demanding enduring peace through institutions, disarmament, and treaties—then his efforts may fall short. Regardless of the outcome, the move places Pakistan on Trump’s radar and subtly shifts the narrative of South Asia’s security calculus in Islamabad’s favor.
Pakistan News
Pakistan gets highest coverage of tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis: UN

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has achieved its highest-ever coverage of diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTP) at 87 percent in 2024, and the UN specialised agencies hope Pakistan to launch its human papillomavirus (HPV) in 2025, according to data for 2024 released by Unicef and WHO on Tuesday.
The data shows South Asia has reached its highest-ever immunisation coverage for children, according to new data released by WHO and Unicef for 2024. This marks a milestone in the region’s drive to protect every child from vaccine-preventable diseases, the UN agencies say.
The new data shows strong government commitments, investments, and partnerships have propelled South Asia to achieve its highest-ever immunisation coverage.
In 2024, 92pc of the infants in the region received their third dose of the diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP) vaccine, a crucial global indicator of vaccination progress.
Pakistan may become the only country in the world having poliovirus, Health Minister Mustafa Kamal tells Senate
This marks a two percentage point increase since 2023. During the same period, the proportion of children receiving their first dose of DTP increased from 93pc to 95pc.
These figures show a strong bounce back, surpassing pre-Covid levels — reflecting efforts of the South Asian governments to prioritise children’s health.
Additionally, there was a 27pc reduction in the number of children who did not receive a single dose of the vaccine, also known as zero-dose children, decreasing from 2.5 million to 1.8 million in a year.
“This is a proud moment for South Asia. More children are protected today than ever before, thanks to tireless frontline health workers, strong government leadership, donors’ and partners’ support and the unwavering trust of families,” said Unicef Regional Director for South Asia, Sanjay Wijesekera.
“But we cannot forget the millions of children who are under-vaccinated or unvaccinated. Now is the time to push further, especially into the most rural areas, to give every child his or her right to healthcare in the earliest years of life,” he said.
However, while the region made leaps in immunising children in 2024, more than 2.9 million children remain un- and under-vaccinated and, therefore, unprotected. With this in mind, Unicef and WHO have urged governments in South Asia to sustain political commitment and increase domestic financing for immunisation.
‘Only country with poliovirus prevalence’
In a separate development, Health Minister Mustafa Kamal told Senate on Tuesday Pakistan might become the only country having poliovirus as in Afghanistan polio vaccination drive face no hurdles and people there are not refusing to vaccinate their children against the crippling disease.
Replying to a calling-attention notice in the Senate, the health minister said that apart from Kandahar, there is door-to-door campaign being held across Afghanistan.
“In Kandahar announcements are made at mosques and people are called to come and get their children administered polio drops in mosques,” he said.
The calling-attention notice was moved by Senator Abdul Shakoor Khan who said that polio cases are being reported and there are misconceptions regarding the disease and suggested that religious scholars must be involved to play their role for curbing the disease.
Mr Kamal said that Pakistan and Afghanistan are the only two countries of the world where polio cases are being reported.
He said he himself went to Balochistan to discuss the issue of polio. Last year, he said, 79 cases of polio were reported and this year only 14 cases have been reported so far out of which five cases have been found in Bannu where there were people who had refused to get their children vaccinated.
He said there is a perception that there is resistance against polio drive in Afghanistan, but the fact is that an extensive polio drive is going on in Afghanistan to eradicate the disease.
He said that earlier police were being used to ensure administration of polio vaccine in Pakistan, but he has stopped it and now influencers of the area are being used to convince the people that they should save the lives of their children and get their children vaccinated.
Published in Dawn, July 16th, 2025
Pakistan News
FBI adds Iran’s envoy to Pakistan to most wanted list

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has added Iran’s ambassador to Pakistan, Reza Amiri Moghadam, to its Most Wanted list for his alleged involvement in the 2007 abduction of retired FBI agent Robert A. “Bob” Levinson, who disappeared after travelling to Iran’s Kish Island.
On Tuesday evening, the FBI’s Washington Field Office released ‘seeking information’ posters identifying three senior Iranian intelligence officials alleged to have played key roles in Levinson’s disappearance and in efforts to conceal Tehran’s involvement.
Ambassador Moghadam — also known as Ahmad Amirinia — previously headed the operations unit of Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS), during which time he oversaw agents operating across Europe. He now serves as Iran’s top diplomat in Islamabad.
According to the FBI, Moghadam is suspected of supervising the operation that led to Levinson’s abduction and later taking part in the cover-up. Levinson, a retired FBI special agent, arrived on Kish Island on 8 March 2007 and went missing the following day.
In a statement, the FBI said the posters were released as part of an ongoing investigation into Iranian officials “who allegedly played roles in Bob’s abduction and Iran’s attempt to obfuscate its responsibility”.
The two other officials named are:
Taghi Daneshvar, also known as Sayyed Taghi Ghaemi, a senior MOIS counter-espionage officer who reportedly supervised Mohammad Baseri — also known as Sanai — around the time Levinson disappeared.
Gholamhossein Mohammadnia, a senior MOIS deputy who served as Iran’s ambassador to Albania in 2016. He was expelled from Albania in December 2018 for allegedly “damaging its national security”. The FBI claims he led efforts to shift blame for Levinson’s disappearance to a terrorist group in Pakistan’s Balochistan region.
“These three intelligence officers were among those who allegedly facilitated Bob’s 2007 abduction and the subsequent cover-up by the Iranian government,” said Steven Jensen, Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Washington Field Office. “Bob likely later perished in captivity far away from his family, friends, and colleagues.”
Images and a video showing Levinson in captivity surfaced in 2010 and 2011, but there has been no confirmed sighting of him since. In March 2025, the US Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on Moghadam and several others in connection with the case.
The FBI maintains that its investigation remains active as it seeks to identify further Iranian officials involved in the abduction. While Pakistani authorities have not been linked to the incident, the case now has a direct connection to Islamabad through Moghadam’s diplomatic posting.
Pakistan News
THE spiral of violence in Balochistan continues, with the barbaric murder of at least nine individuals on Thursday.

The victims were pulled off two Punjab-bound buses travelling between Zhob and Loralai districts, and reportedly, the assailants checked their IDs before offloading them. The banned Balochistan Liberation Front has claimed responsibility for this atrocity.
This is not the first outrage of its kind, as over the past few years, there have been several incidents where non-Baloch victims have been targeted by separatists. Most of the victims have hailed from Punjab. On Friday, the bodies of the slain passengers were sent to their native areas.
Earlier on Thursday, the army, at the corps commanders’ conference, had vowed to take action against proxies they believed were linked to hostile foreign forces, including Fitna al-Khawarij and Fitna al-Hindustan, the terms the military uses for the banned TTP and Baloch separatist groups, respectively. Both strands of militancy have their peculiar dynamics, which require targeted counterterrorism strategies to deal with.
Where Balochistan is concerned, there can be no justification for such gruesome killings, and the elements involved must be brought to justice. No cause can justify targeting innocent people — often from working-class backgrounds — who have come to Balochistan to make an honest living. In this regard the province’s nationalist forces that believe in working within the constitutional framework must clearly condemn the heinous murders of non-Baloch individuals.
It is also a fact that such grave crimes only end up hurting Balochistan, as talented individuals — teachers, doctors, engineers — will stay away from the province due to security concerns. Moreover, such violent episodes have a negative impact on Baloch citizens working or studying in other provinces, as these individuals face increased discrimination.
While strong CT efforts are needed to uproot the terrorist networks responsible for such massacres, in the long run a securitised approach alone will not solve Balochistan’s militancy issues. Terrorist groups — whether local or foreign-backed — must be pursued and neutralised, but there needs to be a parallel political process in the province, while the local population’s genuine demands — regarding enforced disappearances, underdevelopment, lack of opportunities — must be addressed by the state. Separatists exploit these issues, accusing the state of not caring for the average Baloch.
The administration must prove these assertions wrong by encouraging political dialogue in the province, and addressing the socioeconomic concerns of the people. There can be no denying that most parts of the province are vastly underdeveloped, particularly where health and education are concerned. Hostile foreign actors will only exploit these weaknesses, which is why the state must address the issues with honesty. Long-term security can only be achieved when there is equitable development across Balochistan.
Published in Dawn, July 12th, 2025
-
Europe News5 months ago
Chaos and unproven theories surround Tates’ release from Romania
-
American News4 months ago
Trump Expels Zelensky from the White House
-
Pakistan News4 months ago
Can Pakistan be a Hard State?
-
American News4 months ago
Trump expands exemptions from Canada and Mexico tariffs
-
American News5 months ago
Zelensky bruised but upbeat after diplomatic whirlwind
-
Art & Culture4 months ago
International Agriculture Exhibition held in Paris
-
Politics5 months ago
US cuts send South Africa’s HIV treatment ‘off a cliff’
-
Art & Culture4 months ago
The Indian film showing the bride’s ‘humiliation’ in arranged marriage