Connect with us

World News

Israel Controls America: Ted Cruz’s Revealing Confession

Published

on

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : In a political interview that will be studied for years, Senator Ted Cruz—a close confidant of President Donald J. Trump and one of the most prominent Republican voices in Congress—sat down with Tucker Carlson and offered a candid window into the uncomfortable reality of U.S.-Israel relations. His words, wrapped in rationalizations and ideological talking points, confirmed what critics have long warned: the United States is no longer a sovereign actor in the Middle East, but a subordinate executing the will of Israel through lobbying networks like American Israel Pbulic Affair Committee (AIPAC) covert intelligence alignments, and religious manipulation.
Carlson’s questions were pointed. His tone was incredulous. “Do they [Israel] spy domestically in the United States?” he asked. Ted Cruz replied, without hesitation, “Oh, they probably do—and we do as well… Friends and allies spy on each other.” Rather than condemning the breach of national sovereignty, Ted leaned on ideological dogma: “One of the things about being a conservative is you’re not naive… Every one of our friends spies on us.”
But this was no ordinary espionage. Carlson pressed harder: “Including on the President?” Ted did not flinch. “They’re going to anyway,” he said. “I’m not mad at them.” This was not a defense—it was a surrender.
This tacit approval of foreign surveillance on American soil, targeting even the Commander-in-Chief, is a staggering admission. It confirms the deep entrenchment of Mossad within American political and security institutions. From the 1980s Jonathan Pollard case—where a U.S. Navy analyst passed classified secrets to Israel—to the discovery of Israeli surveillance devices near the White House in 2019, the pattern is clear. Israel not only spies on the United States—it does so with impunity, and American lawmakers, far from resisting, justify it.
In Ted’s worldview, this espionage is outweighed by the benefits of the alliance. “It is in America’s interest to be closely allied with Israel,” he claimed, “because we get huge benefits from it.” But that rationale dissolves under scrutiny.
The “benefits” come at a staggering cost. According to the Congressional Research Service, Israel has received more than $150 billion in U.S. aid since its founding, with $3.8 billion annually locked in under a 10-year Memorandum of Understanding signed by the Obama administration. These are taxpayer dollars—used to fund Israeli military expansion, missile defense systems like Iron Dome, and intelligence capabilities that now turn inward on America itself.
The results have been catastrophic. Israel championed the Iraq, Lybia, Syria, Lebanon and Afghanistan Wars. These wars resulted in deaths of over 4,500 American soldiers and over $2 trillion in U.S. spending. Israel paid nothing, sent no troops, and bore no consequences—yet emerged strategically stronger with a fractured Iraq off the map.
This cost does not include billions more in indirect subsidies: loan guarantees, joint weapons research, tax-exempt contributions to Israeli causes, and cooperative agreements that flow predominantly one way. Meanwhile, American citizens shoulder the financial burden of wars launched in Israel’s interest and fought under the American flag.
Ted’s framing of Israel and the United States as having “overlapping interests” reveals a dangerous doctrine: that America’s enemies are whoever Israel designates. Under this logic, countries like Iran, Syria, Lebanon, and even critics within Europe are reflexively treated as adversaries—not based on threat assessments, but on Israeli strategic paranoia.
Carlson laid bare the contradiction: U.S. intelligence says Iran is years away from weaponization, yet the Israeli-driven narrative claims it’s only “days.” When Carlson asked if he would oppose Israeli spying or military manipulation, the senator replied flatly: “They’re going to do it anyway.” It was a stunning concession of powerlessness.
Driving this surrender is AIPAC—the American Israel Public Affairs Committee—a lobbying juggernaut that acts less like an interest group and more like a shadow foreign ministry. Ted admitted that AIPAC “raised a lot of money” for him, though he insisted it came from “individuals” not the organization itself—an evasion that fails to obscure the reality. AIPAC cannot legally donate directly, but its donor network ensures that candidates who tow the Israeli line are richly rewarded by ploying back USA aid, while dissenters are crushed.
In 2022 alone, pro-Israel PACs and donors spent over $100 million in U.S. elections. The result is bipartisan paralysis—where Republicans and Democrats alike refuse to criticize Israel, even as it bombs civilian hospitals, targets nuclear scientists, or spies on the U.S. government.
Layered over this political machinery is a spiritual manipulation that binds millions of American Christians to Israel through theological fantasy. According to this belief—promoted by televangelists, Zionist pastors, and AIPAC-sponsored pilgrimages—supporting Israel is a divine mandate, essential for the return of Christ and personal salvation. Ted embraced this religious overlap as a political asset, noting that American Christians see support for Israel not as a geopolitical choice, but as a spiritual obligation.
Carlson, himself a conservative Christian, rebuked this manipulation. “Is it the job of a U.S. senator to represent the interests of a foreign country?” he asked. The silence in response was louder than any denial.
This alliance is not without consequence. The wars waged at Israel’s behest have produced millions of refugees, destabilized entire regions, and eroded U.S. credibility around the world. From Yemen to Afghanistan, the perception is no longer of America as a peace-broker, but as a military enforcer of Israeli policy.
At the United Nations, the United States routinely vetoes resolutions condemning Israel—even when global consensus is near-unanimous. This has alienated allies in Europe, Africa, and Asia. Meanwhile, countries like China, Russia, Turkey, and Brazil step into the diplomatic vacuum, offering an alternative order free from Israeli hegemony.
The most tragic irony is that the costs—financial, moral, and reputational—are borne by the United States. Israel walks away stronger, more emboldened, and free of accountability. It receives billions in aid, shields itself behind American vetoes, and sends lobbyists to Washington to extract more. Meanwhile, American cities crumble, veterans are left homeless, and the middle class bears the tax burden of imperial overreach.
The Iran conflict marks a tipping point. The world watches as the U.S. prepares to bleed again—militarily, diplomatically, and economically—for a war that serves no American interest. It is not just the Middle East at stake—it is the soul of American democracy.
Senator Ted’s confessions, though cloaked in conservative realism, unmask a deeper betrayal. America is not defending a friend—it is financing its manipulator. It is not acting in its interest—it is acting in fear of political reprisal. It is not leading—it is being led.
If the United States is to reclaim its sovereignty, it must reassert control over its foreign policy, disentangle itself from theological fantasies, and end the unchecked power of foreign lobbies operating on Capitol Hill. This is not antisemitism—it is patriotism. It is the duty of a republic to defend its institutions, its people, and its future from external domination—no matter how sacredly disguised.
The question now is whether America has the courage to reclaim its sovereignty, or whether it will continue to play the role of a global enforcer for a foreign master cloaked in the language of friendship.
The time has come for Americans—Democrats, Republicans, Independents—to question whether the alliance with Israel is indeed serving their interests, or whether it is merely serving the interests of a foreign state cloaked in biblical prophecy, financial influence, and political manipulation.

World News

‘National security is non-negotiable’: Parliamentary secretary on Afghanistan strikes

Published

on

By

ISLAMABAD: Parliamentary Secretary for Information and Broadcasting Barrister Danyal Chaudhry on Monday stressed that national security was “non-negotiable” after Pakistan carried out strikes on terrorist targets in Afghanistan, killing over 80 terrorists.

“Pakistan has always chosen the path of dialogue and peaceful coexistence. But when Afghan soil continues to be used for proxy attacks, we have no choice but to defend our homeland. National security is non-negotiable,” Chaudhry said in a statement.

The PML-N MNA affirmed that the people of Pakistan “stand firmly” with their armed forces in the fight against terrorism.

He urged the Afghan government to take “decisive action to prevent its land from being used for cross-border militancy”, warning that lasting peace in the region depended on the “complete dismantling of terrorist sanctuaries”.

Noting that the recent operation “successfully neutralised militants involved in attacks on Pakistani soil”, Chaudhry stressed: “This action was aimed solely at those responsible for violent attacks inside Pakistan. Every precaution was taken to protect innocent lives.”

He also pointed to Afghanistan’s emergence as a “sanctuary for multiple terrorist groups”. Referring to a United Nations report, he noted that militants from 21 terror outfits were operating from Afghan territory, posing a serious threat to regional stability.

He specifically called out India’s “continued support for terrorist networks”.

“India is actively funding and training these groups, equipping them to carry out cross-border attacks against Pakistan. Such elements deserve no concessions,” the parliamentary secretary asserted.

His remarks came after Pakistan carried out airstrikes on Afghanistan in a retaliatory operation targeting groups responsible for recent suicide bombings in Pakistan.

The strikes killed “more than 80 terrorists”, according to security sources.

The strikes were conducted in retaliation for a series of suicide attacks in IslamabadBajaur, and Bannu that had claimed the lives of Pakistani security personnel and civilians. Authorities described the operation as intelligence-based and proportionate, aimed solely at those responsible for the attacks.

‘Decisive struggle against terrorism’

Separately, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Governor Faisal Karim Kundi asserted that the country will “not allow our soil to be destabilised by forces operating from across the border in Afghanistan”.

In a post on X, he said: “The citizens of Pakistan, especially the resilient people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, stand firmly with our armed forces and security institutions in the defense of our homeland.”

He further said: “The sacrifices of our martyrs bind us together as one nation. In this decisive struggle against terrorism, Pakistan stands united, resolute, and unwavering.

“Our sovereignty is non-negotiable, and the people of this country stand shoulder to shoulder with the state to protect it at all costs.”

Continue Reading

World News

More than 1,500 Venezuelan political prisoners apply for amnesty

Published

on

By

A total of 1,557 Venezuelan political prisoners have applied for amnesty under a new law introduced on Thursday, the country’s National Assembly President has said.

Jorge Rodríguez, brother of Venezuelan interim President Delcy Rodríguez and an ally of former President Nicolás Maduro, also said “hundreds” of prisoners had already been released.

Among them is politician Juan Pablo Guanipa, one of several opposition voices to have criticised the law for excluding certain prisoners.

The US has urged Venezuela to speed up its release of political prisoners since US forces seized Maduro in a raid on 3 January. Venezuela’s socialist government has always denied holding political prisoners.

At a news conference on Saturday Jorge Rodríguez said 1,557 release requests were being addressed “immediately” and ultimately the legislation would extend to 11,000 prisoners.

The government first announced days after Maduro’s capture, on 8 January, that “a significant number” of prisoners would be freed as a goodwill gesture.

Opposition and human rights groups have said the government under Maduro used detentions of political prisoners to stamp out dissent and silence critics for years.

These groups have also criticised the new law. One frequently cited criticism is that it would not extend amnesty to those who called for foreign armed intervention in Venezuela, BBC Latin America specialist Luis Fajardo says.

He noted that law professor Juan Carlos Apitz, of the Central University of Venezuela, told CNN Español that that part of the amnesty law “has a name and surname”. “That paragraph is the Maria Corina Machado paragraph.”

It is not clear if the amnesty would actually cover Machado, who won last year’s Nobel Peace Prize, Fajardo said.

He added that other controversial aspects of the law include the apparent exclusion from amnesty benefits of dozens of military officers involved in rebellions against the Maduro administration over the years.

On Saturday, Rodríguez said it is “releases from Zona Seven of El Helicoide that they’re handling first”.

Those jailed at the infamous prison in Caracas would be released “over the next few hours”, he added.

Activists say some family members of those imprisoned in the facility have gone on hunger strike to demand the release of their relatives.

US President Donald Trump said that El Helicoide would be closed after Maduro’s capture.

Maduro is awaiting trial in custody in the US alongside his wife Cilia Flores and has pleaded not guilty to drugs and weapons charges, saying that he is a “prisoner of war”.

Continue Reading

World News

Iran students stage first large anti-government protests since deadly crackdown

Published

on

By

Students at several universities in Iran have staged anti-government protests – the first such rallies on this scale since last month’s deadly crackdown by the authorities.

The BBC has verified footage of demonstrators marching on the campus of the Sharif University of Technology in the capital Tehran on Saturday. Scuffles were later seen breaking out between them and government supporters.

A sit-in was held at another Tehran university, and a rally reported in the north-east. Students were honouring thousands of those killed in mass protests in January.

The US has been building up its military presence near Iran, and President Donald Trump has said he is considering a limited military strike.

The US and its European allies suspect that Iran is moving towards the development of a nuclear weapon, something Iran has always denied.

US and Iranian officials met in Switzerland on Tuesday and said progress had been made in talks aimed at curbing Iran’s nuclear programme.

But despite the reported progress, Trump said afterwards that the world would find out “over the next, probably, 10 days” whether a deal would be reached with Iran or the US would take military action.

The US leader has supported protesters in the past – at one stage appearing to encourage them with a promise that “help is on its way”.

Footage verified by the BBC shows hundreds of protesters – many with national Iranian flags – peacefully marching on the campus of the Sharif University of Technology at the start of a new semester on Saturday.

The crowds chanted “death to the dictator” – a reference to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – and other anti-government slogans.

Supporters of a rival pro-government rally are seen nearby in the video. Scuffles are later seen breaking out between the two camps.

Verified photos have also emerged showing a peaceful sit-in protest at the capital’s Shahid Beheshti University.

The BBC have also verified footage from another Tehran university, Amir Kabir University of Technology, showing chanting against the government.

In Mashhad, Iran’s second-largest city in the north-east, local students reportedly chanted: “Freedom, freedom” and “Students, shout, shout for your rights”.

Sizeable demonstrations in other locations were also reported later in the day, with calls for further rallies on Sunday.

It is not immediately clear whether any demonstrators have been arrested.

Last month’s protests began over economic grievances and soon spread to become the largest since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (Hrana) said it had confirmed the killing of at least 6,159 people during that wave, including 5,804 protesters, 92 children and 214 people affiliated with the government.

Hrana also said it was investigating 17,000 more reported deaths.

Iranian authorities said late last month that more than 3,100 people had been killed – but that the majority were security personnel or bystanders attacked by “rioters”.

Saturday’s protests come as the Iranian authorities are preparing for a possible war with the US.

The exiled opposition is adamantly calling on President Trump to make good on his threats and strike, hoping for a quick downfall of the current hardline government.

But other opposition groups are opposed to outside intervention.

The opposing sides have been involved in disinformation campaigns of social media, trying to maximise their conflicting narratives of what Iranian people want.

Additional reporting by BBC Persian’s Ghoncheh Habibiazad, and BBC Verify’s Richard Irvine-Brown and Shayan Sardarizadeh.

Continue Reading

Trending