Connect with us

American News

Elon Musk and Donald Trump: From Allies to Adversaries

Published

on

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis: Elon Musk is widely hailed as one of the most intelligent, inventive, and enterprising individuals of our era. From humble beginnings, he created Tesla—now a global symbol of prestige, environmental innovation, and American industrial might. His Cybertrucks, sedans, and Model Xs populate highways from California to China, and his vision goes far beyond Earth. With SpaceX, he dreams of colonizing Mars; with Starlink, he aims to bring satellite-based internet to every corner of the world, especially those untouched by traditional connectivity.
Musk is no ordinary entrepreneur. He is the embodiment of the private sector’s limitless ambition—sharp, calculative, and daring. It was with this same foresight that Musk evaluated the 2024 U.S. presidential race. Using the full weight of his data-driven infrastructure, artificial intelligence labs, and possibly even his experimental quantum computing capabilities, Musk and his team likely ran models on how much a Trump victory would benefit his sprawling empire.
Musk became the single largest individual contributor to Donald Trump’s campaign, funneling nearly $288 million into the 2024 re-election effort. This was not charity. This was calculated investment. He expected returns—massive ones.
Had his projections materialized, Musk stood to gain significantly. He was banking on Trump to offer substantial tax breaks for electric vehicle producers like Tesla, open government coffers to fund the Mars colonization effort via SpaceX, expand satellite contracts under Starlink, and ease federal regulations that often choked innovation. This was to be the ultimate private-public handshake—a deal between power and capital, innovation and governance.
Trump, a seasoned political tactician and unpredictable force, had other plans. While initially wooing Musk and appointing him to head the newly formed Department of Government Efficiency (ironically abbreviated as DOGE), Trump positioned Musk at the forefront of sweeping bureaucratic reforms.
Musk, known for disrupting industries, found himself trying to “disrupt” the federal government—a machine more massive, convoluted, and interlocked than any private sector conglomerate. Alongside him were Anonymous as the department’s lead strategist and Vivek Ramaswamy as deputy, neither of whom had any substantial experience managing such a massive administrative ecosystem. What ensued was chaos.
Under Musk’s brief stewardship of DOGE, thousands of federal employees were laid off in an aggressive downsizing campaign. Entire departments, like USIS (U.S. International Services), were defunded and rendered obsolete. The social security net—lifelines for the elderly, veterans, disabled citizens, and the working poor—faced brutal austerity. Education institutions were mocked and dismissed for “wasting money on trivial research,” as per internal memos. Predictably, the blowback was immense.
But here’s the twist—while the political consequences of these decisions damaged the Trump administration’s public image, Musk bore the brunt of the reputational carnage. Protesters boycotted Tesla vehicles. Starlink subscriptions declined. SpaceX lost pending government partnerships. In total, Tesla lost nearly $150 billion in market capitalization, and Musk’s personal wealth reportedly dropped by over $8 billion in a matter of weeks.
The public began seeing Musk not as a visionary, but as an enabler of political cruelty—one who traded compassion and ethics for contracts and concessions. His marriage of convenience with Trump was rapidly deteriorating into a nightmare.
And then came the final blow. Trump, in an unexpected move that blindsided Musk’s strategy teams, eliminated all federal tax credits for electric vehicles, a key policy instituted during the Biden administration that had helped Tesla maintain its competitive edge. The “Big Beautiful Bill,” as Trump called it, redirected funds toward fossil-fuel-based industries, internal combustion engine subsidies, and defense manufacturing.
All of Musk’s calculations unraveled. No tax relief. No contract expansions. No Mars funding. No regulatory easing. In fact, the very act of placing Musk at the head of DOGE seemed, in hindsight, to be a clever political decoy. Trump utilized Musk’s corporate stature to execute controversial decisions, allowing the tech mogul to soak up the public’s anger, while Trump distanced himself as the politician who didn’t cave to corporate interests.
Musk, in turn, was left alienated—abandoned both by political leadership and the public. His products suffered, his reputation suffered, and most painfully, he received none of the political rewards he had bet nearly $300 million on. The entire affair became a textbook case of conflict of interest gone wrong.
In a recent interview, Musk admitted that meddling in politics was “a bitter lesson.” He vowed to withdraw from political maneuvering and focus instead on what he does best—innovation.
The lesson? Never underestimate a politician—especially not one like Trump, who has made unpredictability his strongest political asset. He is known to act with unilateral decisions, often impulsive and strategically obscure. Musk, for all his intelligence and resources, failed to predict the very human, very emotional, and highly unpredictable nature of political power.
As someone who served in government and diplomacy, I fully understand the scale and complexity of the federal machinery. It is interconnected, fiercely protected by legacy systems, and incredibly hard to reform. What Musk attempted was akin to striking a mountain with a chisel. But instead of breaking the mountain, he broke his own tool.
Moreover, Musk’s central role in auditing departments that were, ironically, his clients—such as those dealing with tech contracts, infrastructure, and innovation—amounted to a glaring ethical lapse. This wasn’t just bad optics; it was a profound conflict of interest, and the backlash was swift and brutal.
Ultimately, Trump gained. He emerged as the anti-corporate crusader who didn’t bend to billionaire pressures. Musk lost—not only money and market share but trust. Trust is the most expensive currency in politics and business, and once lost, it’s almost impossible to buy back.
This saga of two titans—one of politics, the other of technology—reminds us that when the public and private sectors collide without clear boundaries and ethical foresight, the resulting wreckage can be colossal. Musk may be a brilliant inventor, but politics proved to be a different beast altogether. Let this be a lasting lesson to all powerful entrepreneurs: play your part, not theirs.

American News

‘The bodies just kept coming’ – photographer at deadly Rio police raid

Published

on

By

A photographer who witnessed the aftermath of a massive Brazilian police operation in Rio de Janeiro has told the BBC of how residents came back with mutilated bodies of those who had died.

The bodies “kept coming: 25, 30, 35, 40, 45…”, Bruno Itan told BBC Brasil. They included those of police officers.

One of the bodies had been decapitated – others were “totally disfigured”, he said. Many also had what he says were stab wounds.

More than 120 people were killed during Tuesday’s raid on a criminal gang – the deadliest such raid in the city.

Bruno Itan told BBC Brasil that he was first alerted to the raid early on Tuesday by residents of the Alemão neighbourhood, who sent him messages telling him there was a shoot-out.

The photographer made his way to the Getúlio Vargas hospital, where the bodies were arriving.

Itan says that the police stopped members of the press from entering the Penha neighboorhood, where the operation was under way.

“Police officers formed a line and said: ‘The press doesn’t get past here.'”

But Itan, who grew up in the area, says he was able to make his way into the cordoned-off area, where he remained until the next morning.

He says that Tuesday night, local residents began to search the hillside which divides Penha from the nearby Alemão neighbourhood for relatives who had been missing since the police raid.

Bruno Itan Around two dozen residents of Penha search a hillside for people who went missing after a police raid. Some of them are looking down what looks like a ravine, while others are walking.

Residents of the Penha neighbourhood proceeded to place the recovered bodies in a square – and Itan’s photos show the reaction of the people there.

“The brutality of it all impacted me a lot: the sorrow of the families, mothers fainting, pregnant wives, crying, outraged parents,” the photographer recalled.

Bruno Itan A group of people - many of them women - look at the ground where bodies have been placed. One man is covering his mouth with his T-shirt. A woman is grabbing the shoulders of the woman in front of her and is crying.
There was shock in Penha as locals retrieved more and more bodies from the nearby hillside

The governor of Rio state said that the massive police operation involving around 2,500 security personnel was aimed at stopping a criminal group known as Comando Vermelho (Red Command) from expanding its territory.

Initially, the Rio state government maintained that “60 suspects and four police officers” had been killed in the operation.

They have since said that their “preliminary” count shows that 117 “suspects” have been killed.

Rio’s public defender’s office, which provides legal assistance to the poor, has put the total number of people killed at 132.

According to researchers, Red Command is the only criminal group which in recent years has managed to make territorial gains in the state of Rio de Janeiro.

It is widely considered one of the two largest gangs in the country, alongside First Capital Command (PCC), and has a history dating back more than 50 years.

According to Brazilian journalist Rafael Soares, who has been covering crime in Rio for years, Red Command “operates like a franchise” with local criminal leaders forming part of the gang and becoming “business partners”.

The gang engages primarily in drug trafficking, but also smuggles guns, gold, fuel, alcohol and tobacco.

According to the authorities, gang members are well armed and police said that during the raid, they came under attack from explosive-laden drones.

The governor of Rio state, Cláudio Castro, described Red Command members as “narcoterrorists” and called the four police officers killed in the raid “heroes”.

But the number of people killed in the operation has come in for criticism with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights saying it was “horrified”.

At a news conference on Wednesday, Governor Castro defended the police force.

“It wasn’t our intention to kill anyone. We wanted to arrest them all alive,” he said.

He added that the situation had escalated because the suspects had retaliated: “It was a consequence of the retaliation they carried out and the disproportionate use of force by those criminals.”

The governor also said that the bodies displayed by locals in Penha had been “manipulated”.

In a post on X, he said that some of them had been stripped of the camouflage clothing he said they had been wearing “in order to shift blame onto the police”.

Felipe Curi of Rio’s civil police force also said that “camouflage clothing, vests, and weapons” had been removed from the bodies and showed footage appearing to show a man cutting camouflage clothing off a corpse.

Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has summoned Governor Castro to a hearing on Monday to explain the police actions “in detail”.

Continue Reading

American News

Trump’s Asia tour sees deals, knee-bending and a revealing final meeting

Published

on

By

US presidential trips abroad have traditionally been an opportunity to display the power of the American nation on the world stage. Donald Trump’s five-day swing through eastern Asia, on the other hand, has been a display of the power of Trump – but also, at times, of that power’s limitations.

Trump’s stops in Malaysia, Japan and South Korea over the course of the first four days were an exercise in pleasing a sometimes mercurial American president. It was an acknowledgement that Trump, with the flick of a pen, could impose tariffs and other measures that have the potential to devastate the economies of export-dependent nations.

His sit-down with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Thursday, however, was something entirely different.

It was a meeting of equals on the global stage, where the stakes for both nations – for their economies, for their international prestige, for the welfare of their people – were enormous.

With China, Trump may flick his pen, but such actions come with consequences. They come with a cost.

For the first four days, Trump’s most recent foray into global diplomacy was smooth sailing.

Each stop was punctuated by a blend of traditional trade negotiations – deals made under the shadow of Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs – and personal accommodations that at times bordered on the obsequious.

In Malaysia, Trump secured access to critical minerals and made progress toward finalising trade arrangements with south-east Asian nations. He also presided over a treaty that should ease border tensions between Thailand and Cambodia – the kind of “peace deal” the American president loves to tout.

In Japan, Trump’s Marine One flew past a Tokyo Tower lit red, white and blue – with a top in Trumpian gold.

Newly elected Prime Minister Sanai Takaichi detailed $550bn in Japanese investments in the US and offered the American president a gift of 250 cherry trees for America’s 250th birthday, and a golf club and bag that belonged to Shinzo Abe, the assassinated former prime minister who bonded with Trump in his first term.

She also became the latest foreign leader to nominate Trump for his much-desired Nobel Peace Prize.

Not to be outdone, South Korea welcomed Trump with artillery firing a 21-gun salute and a military band that played Hail to the Chief and YMCA – the Village People song that has become a Trump rally anthem.

President Lee Jae Myung held an “honour ceremony” for Trump during which he gave the American leader his nation’s highest medal and a replica of an ancient Korean dynastic crown.

Lunch with Lee featured a “Peacemaker’s Dessert” of gold-encrusted brownies. Later that day, the Koreans served Trump vineyard wine at an intimate dinner in Trump’s honour with six world leaders attending the Asia-Pacific Economic Conference summit.

Continue Reading

American News

Trump caps refugee admissions at 7,500 – mostly white South Africans

Published

on

By

The Trump administration will limit the number of refugees admitted to the US to 7,500, and give priority to white South Africans.

The move, announced in a notice published on Thursday, will apply for the next fiscal year and marks a dramatic cut from the previous limit of 125,000 set by former President Joe Biden.

No reason was given for the cut, but the notice said it was “justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest”.

In January 2025, Trump signed an executive order suspending the US Refugee Admissions Programme, or USRAP, which he said would allow US authorities to prioritise national security and public safety.

The notice posted to the website of the Federal Register said the 7,500 admissions would “primarily” be allocated to Afrikaner South Africans and “other victims of illegal or unjust discrimination in their respective homelands”.

In the Oval Office in May, Trump criticised South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and claimed white farmers in his nation were being killed and “persecuted”.

The White House also played a video which they said showed burial sites for murdered white farmers. Trump said he did not know where in South Africa the scene was filmed.

The tense meeting came just days after the US granted asylum to 60 Afrikaners. It later emerged that the videos were scenes from a 2020 protest in which the crosses represented farmers killed over multiple years.

On his first day in office on 20 January, Trump said the US would suspend USRAP to reflect the US’s lack of “ability to absorb large numbers of migrants, and in particular, refugees, into its communities in a manner that does not compromise the availability of resources for Americans” and “protects their safety and security”.

The US policy of accepting white South Africans has already prompted accusations of unfair treatment from refugee advocacy groups.

Some have argued the US is now effectively shut to other persecuted groups or people facing potential harm in their home country, and even former allies that helped US forces in Afghanistan or the Middle East.

“This decision doesn’t just lower the refugee admissions ceiling,” Global Refuge CEO and president Krish O’Mara Vignarajah said on Thursday. “It lowers our moral standing.”

“At a time of crisis in countries ranging from Afghanistan to Venezuela to Sudan and beyond, concentrating the vast majority of admissions on one group undermines the programme’s purpose as well as its credibility,” she added.

The South African government has yet to respond to the latest announcement.

During the Oval Office meeting, President Ramaphosa said only that he hoped that Trump officials would listen to South Africans about the issue, and later said he believed there is “doubt and disbelief about all this in [Trump’s] head”.

Continue Reading

Trending