Pakistan News
Diaspora Dissent: Not for Sale
Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : In an unprecedented wave of political activism, overseas Pakistanis—particularly staunch supporters of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) and Imran Khan—have mounted a global campaign of defiance against the current Pakistani regime. From London to New York, Toronto to Berlin, these protests have transcended symbolic gestures to become aggressive assertions of political will. The Pakistani diaspora has turned global cities into battlegrounds for democratic accountability, branding those allegedly involved in electoral manipulation as persona non grata.
These protests reflect deep-rooted disillusionment among overseas Pakistanis toward what they perceive as a civilian-military coup. The Form-45 regime, symbolizing electoral rigging, has become a rallying cry for expatriates who feel democracy has been hijacked. These protests have evolved into personal confrontations, with Pakistani officials—civilian and military alike—being heckled and humiliated abroad.
Overseas Pakistanis have effectively shrunk the world for those they hold responsible for undermining democracy. These individuals can no longer travel abroad in peace—they are harassed mid-flight, greeted at airports with derogatory slogans, and often followed to their hotels or residences. Even during public events, speakers perceived to be aligned with the alleged illegitimate regime are frequently interrupted, insulted, and publicly shamed.
In response, the government resorted to repressive measures. The relatives of vocal expatriate Pakistanis were reportedly detained and mistreated while the expatriates were made to listen via phone—an intimidation tactic designed to silence dissent. Passports and national identity cards of active overseas Pakistanis were suspended, barring them from returning home. Laws were swiftly enacted to curtail digital speech, with social media platforms blocked and internet speeds deliberately slowed during key protests.
These coercive actions were accompanied by an expansive state-led propaganda campaign. The Ministry of Information, effectively reduced to an auxiliary arm of the ISPR, was mobilized to downplay protests, suppress online dissent, and discredit critics. Despite these efforts, the resolve of the overseas Pakistani community remained unshaken. Rather than diminishing in strength, the protests gained momentum and international visibility.
Realizing that intimidation alone was failing, the state pivoted toward engagement. Delegations comprising serving and retired generals and senior diplomats were dispatched to diaspora hubs to appeal for support. These officials implored expatriates to differentiate between state institutions and individual actions, warning that criticism of the army was tantamount to treason. The government’s outreach primarily targeted embassy-affiliated individuals—those who maintain close ties with diplomats in return for favors and visibility. These individuals, often viewed with suspicion by the broader community, lack genuine grassroots legitimacy and are regarded as mouthpieces rather than representatives.
These select figures were later included in choreographed trips to Pakistan, where they were feted with VIP treatment and praised as “the lifeline of Pakistan.” These public relations exercises, orchestrated and funded by ISPR, were designed to create the illusion of overseas unity and support. Simultaneously, the government rolled out investment incentives, preferential immigration procedures, and tax breaks for expatriates—misguided attempts to purchase silence.
But this strategy ignored a fundamental truth: overseas Pakistanis are not fighting for personal gains. They are fighting for the soul of their nation. Their commitment stems from a deep emotional bond with their homeland and a belief in democratic values, human dignity, and national justice.
Their agitation against the army was fueled by the perception that the civilian government, judiciary, and parliament have been rendered powerless, acting only to bolster military dominance and implement the vision of General Syed Asim Munir. His leadership has come to symbolize the transformation of Pakistan into a “hard state”—a nation where dissent is not debated but disciplined.
General Asim Munir’s thinking pattern to deal with dissent follows a strict, militarized doctrine. He sees public demonstrations, political activism, and journalistic inquiry not as democratic exercises but as threats to national cohesion. His public statements reflect an unwavering commitment to rooting out what he describes as “internal enemies,” “foreign agents,” or “facilitators” of chaos. Whether dealing with Baloch separatists, the TTP, or dissenters on social media, his response framework remains rooted in control through surveillance, suppression, and force.
This worldview—conditioned by years of counterinsurgency and military strategy—is ill-suited for civilian governance. In his formulation, peace is imposed, not negotiated; order is enforced, not earned. In practice, this leads to silencing voices, curbing freedoms, and criminalizing criticism. Such a posture may be effective in battlefield logistics, but when applied to civilians, it risks alienating populations and undermining the very fabric of the nation.
This hardline approach overlooks the methods used by progressive and democratic nations to resolve internal conflict: dialogue, negotiation, institutional reform, and civic inclusion. When citizens are treated with respect and their voices are heard, peace prevails. But when fear becomes a tool of governance, nations suffer: capital and talent flee, innovation dries up, and cultural expression is stifled. Pakistan, unfortunately, is heading down that path.
This internal repression mirrors a broader national crisis. In Balochistan, enforced disappearances and heavy-handed military tactics have ignited a rebellion. Rather than addressing long-standing grievances, the state continues to respond with brute force. In Sindh, tensions over water rights have deepened provincial resentment, with no meaningful resolution in sight. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is once again battling a surge in terrorism, while Punjab reels from rampant political victimization of PTI leaders, supporters, and even apolitical citizens.
The voice of the overseas Pakistani community is, therefore, not a disruption—it is an extension of this national cry for justice. Their message is consistent: without restoring electoral integrity, releasing political prisoners, and withdrawing military interference from civil governance, Pakistan will remain unstable both at home and abroad.
The solution lies not in suppression but in reform. The judiciary must be independent, political plurality must be safeguarded, and the media must be allowed to operate freely. Cosmetic PR campaigns cannot mask the truth, and the diaspora sees through them. Their activism is not for show; it is a principled stand for a democratic Pakistan.
No amount of choreographed visits, orchestrated praise, or economic incentives will pacify a politically awakened diaspora. The state has gravely misjudged their conviction. These Pakistanis abroad are not mere remittance-senders—they are informed, connected, and resolute agents of change.
The path forward requires a national reckoning. Real reform must replace propaganda. Justice must replace intimidation. Dialogue must replace threats. Until that transformation occurs, the voice of the overseas Pakistani community—amplified across borders and continents—will continue to grow louder. And that voice, forged in conviction and steeped in truth, cannot and will not be silenced.
Pakistan News
PM Shehbaz again thanks Trump for ‘bold and decisive leadership’ in brokering Pak-India ceasefire
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Saturday, once again, thanked the “bold and decisive leadership” of US President Donald Trump for brokering a ceasefire between Pakistan and India during the conflict between the two nuclear neighbours in May.
While addressing Azerbaijan’s Victory Day parade in Baku, the premier praised President Trump’s exemplary leadership, which led to the success of the peace efforts.
“It was President Trump’s, bold and decisive leadership, that brought about, the ceasefire, between Pakistan and India, restoring peace in South Asia — averting a major war, and saving millions of people.”
In his speech, the PM reiterated that Pakistan, “just like their Azerbaijani and Turkish brothers”, seeks peace, adding that no one can ever be allowed to challenge its sovereignty or undermine its territorial integrity.
The premier recalled that the Azerbaijani and Turkish military contingents had “proudly” marched alongside the Pakistani armed forces in Islamabad amid tremendous applause on August 14 this year, when they celebrated ‘Marka-i-Haq’ to commemorate their “historic victory” in the four-day war with India.
The Pakistan Army had named the period of conflict with India from the April 22 Pahalgam attack to the May 10 conclusion of Operation Bunyanum Marsoos as “Marka-i-Haq” in May.
PM Shehbaz highlighted how, five years ago, “the courageous sons of Azerbaijan, under the bold and visionary leadership of President Ilham Aliyev, rose to respond to the call of history”.
“The world witnessed in awe as Azerbaijan’s brave armed forces liberated their ancestral lands of majestic Karabakh,” the PM stated. “Throughout this entire struggle for liberation, Pakistan stood like a rock with its brotherly country Azerbaijan.”
According to PM Shehbaz, Azerbaijan’s victory in Karabakh was a “glorious vindication” of a just cause and a beacon of hope for all nations striving for sovereignty and self-determination, including the brave and resilient people of Gaza and Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir.
The prime minister arrived in Baku on Friday for a two-day official visit to Azerbaijan at Aliyev’s invitation and to attend the country’s Victory Day ceremony.
Referring to the recent flare up with the Afghan Taliban regime, the prime minister said that their common resolve for peace has most recently been tested in the case of Afghanistan and expressed gratitude to President Recep Tayyip Erdogan as well as to Emir of Qatar Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani for their “invaluable contribution” in facilitating, the peace efforts, between Pakistan and Afghanistan.
“This is a true reflection of the strong and time-tested fraternal ties between our countries that stand together, through thick and thin,“ he opined.
Victory Day is observed to “commemorate the historic victory in the 44-day-long Karabakh Liberation War against Armenia”, according to the PM’s Office.
Pakistan News
Bill for 27th Constitutional Amendment tabled in Senate after federal cabinet’s approval
Shortly after getting approval from the federal cabinet, the bill for the 27th Constitutional Amendment was tabled before the Senate on Saturday and subsequently referred to the standing committees on law and justice.
A joint session of both the NA and Senate standing committees on law and justice was then summoned to discuss the amendment.
However, during the session of the standing committees, two Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) members, Aliya Kamran and Senator Kamran Murtaza, boycotted the meeting and said the proposed draft included amendments that were discarded in the 26th Amendment bill.
Following deliberations on the proposed amendment, the law committees of both Houses adjourned the moot till Sunday.
‘Discussions will continue till consensus is reached’
Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar, speaking to the media after the adjournment of the committees, said all parties were participating in the session and they had also “requested the opposition to participate”.
“Aliya Kamran had informed us that they have instructions from their party not to attend the session; however, all other parties were in attendance. We even asked the opposition to be a part of the session.”
Tarar said the “long-awaited” proposed amendment has been in discussion for the last 10-15 years. “Even today we are having a constructive debate on the matter.”
“At the time of the 18th Amendment, it was on the constitutional agenda, and even earlier, during the 26th Amendment, but due to certain reasons, one of which was Maulana Fazlur Rehman’s suggestion that such a major change should not be made and that it would be better to move towards transition and form constitutional benches,” said Tarar.
The law minister elaborated that the formation of the benches increased the workload of the judiciary, as the same judges were hearing cases fixed for the bench and otherwise.
“The objective was to ensure that the cases fixed in the Supreme Court are not delayed further and the common man gets relief.”
Tarar added that one of the aims of the proposed changes is also to do away with the criticism of a “court within a court”. “All members have reviewed it (proposed constitutional amendment) and we have completed arguments on around 60pc of the clauses.”
The law minister said a few questions have been raised by some members, clarifying that they are legal in nature and “not fundamental issues”.
“We will reconvene again tomorrow morning at 11am and continue our discussions. And till the time we do not reach a consensus, from all members of both Houses, the discussions will continue,” said the law minister.
The Senate and standing committee sessions will resume on Sunday, November 9.
Farooq H. Naek said no decision has been reached yet after deliberations on the proposed constitutional amendment, and claimed around 80pc of the bill was discussed.
He added that certain “mistakes” in the draft will be corrected and the law ministry has been made aware.
When asked about changes to Article 243, he said it was not discussed during today’s session.
Tarar tables bill in Senate
The bill, which was tabled in the Senate by the law minister, proposed the formation of a Federal Constitutional Court, changes in the process for appointing high court judges, changes to the threshold for provincial cabinets, and changes to the military leadership structure.
At the outset of the session, Tarar — who had earlier in the day briefed the media on some features of the proposed legislation after the federal cabinet meeting — requested the suspension of the question hour and other house business so he could brief lawmakers on the amendment.
The law minister then moved the bill before the upper house, with Chairman Yousuf Raza Gillani referring it to the National Assembly and Senate standing committees on law and justice for review and consideration. He said that both committees may hold joint meetings for a detailed review and consideration, and the report would be presented before the House.
Pakistan News
PTI, Imran should ‘take a step back’; govt should create space for engagement: Fawad
Former PTI leader Fawad Chaudhry said on Monday that both the government and the PTI, along with Imran Khan, need to show flexibility in order to create space for engagement to decrease the political friction in the country.
Fawad is one of the three former PTI leaders who say they have been engaging with the party’s incarcerated leadership to put an end to politics of confrontation as part of their political outreach initiative.
They also visited PTI leader Shah Mahmood Qureshi, after he was taken to a hospital in Lahore from prison, on Thursday, to convince him to join their campaign.
“I’ve said this from the first day, the government should move one step forward and the PTI and Imran Khan should move back one step so space is created,” said the former PTI leader while speaking during an interview on DawnNewsTV show ‘News Wise’.
He maintained that both sides would have to decide on the need to bring down the temperature, warning that if the PTI did not pursue engagement and talks, it would face similar treatment as the disbanding and ban on the proscribed Tehreek-i-Labbaik Pakistan.
“The government needs this, because whatever international successes they have gained are not translating into Pakistan … so both sides need the temperature to come down. We think the leaders of Lahore should play the role of a pivot and take this forward.”
Chaudhry added that the immediate need was to lower the political temperature, saying talks could not proceed if both sides could not even bear to see each other.
Defending his former party’s obstinacy against engagement in talks, he said it was also due to the behaviour of the government, which had made a policy of “crushing and sidelining” the opposition.
“The two ruling parties, the establishment and the PTI, are the four big players and the political temperature between them should come down. How will that happen? …you will have to give the leadership in Lahore’s jail the chance to talk to Imran Khan.”
He further said that the establishment and the government needed to decide whether the country needed a reduction in political temperature or not. “I am very hopeful they have this view too.”
Referring to the group’s recent activities, Chaudhry said they had a meeting of at least 45 minutes with Qureshi.
He added that the proposal being carried by the group was not even their own, instead pointing to a letter by incarcerated PTI leaders in Lahore earlier this year, which called for a reduction in political friction and encouraged engagement.
Chaudhry was not without criticism for the government, saying it had backed the PTI into a corner. “If you don’t engage with the PTI, the only way forward it has is to protest,” he said.
The former federal minister added that in such a situation, the PTI could lead a protest to Islamabad and resign from the National Assembly, while the government would attempt to impose governor’s rule in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, which would be resisted by the party.
“Another event like November 26, 2024, will happen, and as a result of this, the tensions and political temperature in Pakistan will increase. The problem right now is that, we the people, living in Pakistan are being severely impacted by this,” he said, adding that the group had requested the incarcerated PTI leaders in Lahore that if there was no implementation of their earlier recommendation, it would lead to great loss for both the party and the government.
He also said the fact that the group was allowed to meet the incarcerated PTI leadership in Kot Lakpat jail was an encouraging sign.
“Senior government ministers called me and appreciated the effort,” he said, pointing to Information Minister Attaullah Tarar’s welcoming of the development in particular.
“Senior PTI leadership also called and said that this is the only way.”
-
Europe News8 months agoChaos and unproven theories surround Tates’ release from Romania
-
American News8 months agoTrump Expels Zelensky from the White House
-
American News8 months agoTrump expands exemptions from Canada and Mexico tariffs
-
American News8 months agoZelensky bruised but upbeat after diplomatic whirlwind
-
Art & Culture8 months agoThe Indian film showing the bride’s ‘humiliation’ in arranged marriage
-
Art & Culture8 months agoInternational Agriculture Exhibition held in Paris
-
Politics8 months agoUS cuts send South Africa’s HIV treatment ‘off a cliff’
-
Politics8 months agoWorst violence in Syria since Assad fall as dozens killed in clashes
