Connect with us

Pakistan News

Democratic vs. Military Decision-Making

Published

on

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : Pakistan’s decision-making process is heavily dominated by military leadership, rendering civilian politicians mere figureheads without real authority. Despite holding official positions, they lack the autonomy to implement policies independently, as the final say rests with the military establishment. This power-centric governance model has plunged the country into political and economic chaos, fueling regional alienation and insurgencies, particularly in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
Balochistan, in particular, has faced insurgency for decades, and rather than seeing a decline, the conflict has intensified due to the systemic exclusion of genuine Baloch leadership from decision-making processes. This exclusion, coupled with the province’s chronic deprivation, including a lack of education, widespread unemployment, and entrenched poverty, has further alienated its people. As the state weakens, the military’s grip on Balochistan is loosening, while Khyber Pakhtunkhwa faces a similar trajectory, with increasing instability and growing public dissent.
Faced with this deteriorating situation, politicians have repeatedly urged the military leadership to take corrective measures. They have called for steps to address political alienation, growing separatist sentiments, and widespread resentment toward the armed forces. Rather than proactively taking initiatives to integrate disgruntled elements into the mainstream, even the president, prime minister, federal ministers, and parliamentarians have found themselves publicly appealing to military leadership, reflecting their sense of helplessness.
However, the military remains fixated on securing national resources rather than focusing on governance reforms or public welfare. This widening gulf between civilian and military decision-making rendered the political leaders, regardless of their intentions, powerless, and their proposals hold no weight making the governance ineffective, with the democratic process reduced to a mere façade.
Civilian decision-making traditionally follows a structured and institutionalized process designed to ensure transparency, inclusivity, and accountability. Initially, issues affecting multiple provinces are identified clearly and subjected to comprehensive feasibility studies to evaluate economic, social, environmental, and political impacts. Extensive consultations with stakeholders—including provincial governments, subject matter experts, civil society organizations, and representatives from affected communities—then take place. These steps help ensure that diverse perspectives inform policy formulation.
Subsequently, identified issues are deliberated within the Council of Common Interests (CCI), where provincial heads strive to achieve consensus-based solutions. Following CCI deliberations, proposed policies or initiatives are opened to public scrutiny through structured hearings or open forums, allowing for direct feedback and community engagement. Once public input is incorporated, detailed policy frameworks are drafted and undergo formal legislative scrutiny, involving parliamentary debate, amendments, and voting. During implementation, continuous monitoring and periodic evaluations ensure policies remain effective and aligned with national welfare, reinforcing governance in a diverse and complex country like Pakistan.
In stark contrast, military decision-making operates on a rigid and centralized model, shrouded in secrecy and primarily driven by hierarchy and discipline, with the primary objective to identify the enemy and neutralize it, whether civilian or military. Once a decision is finalized by the army chief or top military commanders, it is communicated through clear, concise orders, and swiftly executed without extensive deliberation or civilian engagement or caring for consequences.
This contrast between civilian and military governance underscores why democratic nations flourish. Countries with strong democratic institutions prioritize long-term stability, economic progress, and national development. India serves as a prime example. Since independence, it has upheld civilian supremacy, allowing democratic institutions to mature and drive sustained economic growth. Despite facing numerous internal challenges, India has emerged as one of the world’s fastest-growing economies and is poised to become the third-largest global economy in a year or two. This success highlights the effectiveness of democratic governance, where elected representatives prioritize public welfare over institutional control.
Pakistan’s trajectory, however, has been the opposite. The military’s repeated interventions have crippled democratic institutions, rendering governance ineffective. The constitution is frequently bypassed, parliament remains weak, the judiciary is undermined, and the media is suppressed. The military has turned state institutions against the public, leading to widespread resentment. While it justifies its control by branding civilian leadership as corrupt, incompetent, and disloyal, its own policies have pushed the country toward economic collapse and social unrest.
Balochistan, once considered a region of unrest, has now reached a boiling point. The military’s continued repression and exclusion of local leaders have radicalized large segments of the population. The Baloch insurgency, which once operated on the fringes, now enjoys widespread local support, turning the armed forces into the primary adversary in the eyes of many Baloch citizens. Similar trends are emerging in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where militant groups have gained ground due to the army’s counterproductive policies.
Now, Punjab—historically the military’s stronghold—is also experiencing disillusionment. The army’s policies, particularly corporate land acquisitions, water mismanagement, and suppression of political voices, have alienated large sections of the Punjabi population. The military’s controversial decision to divert water from the Indus River Basin to irrigate corporate farmland in southern Punjab has further fueled deep resentment in the province of Sindh, which had termed it a stealing of their rightful water share. For the first time, a significant portion of Punjab and Sindh’s populations are beginning to view the army as a self-serving institution rather than a national protector.
Internationally, Pakistan’s foreign policy has also suffered due to the military’s dominance. Unlike its neighbors, which maintain stable and mutually beneficial relationships, Pakistan has strained ties with almost all bordering nations except China. Relations with India remain hostile, ties with Afghanistan are marred by conflict, and even Iran has grown wary of Pakistan’s policies. This diplomatic isolation is largely a result of military-driven foreign policy, which prioritizes security concerns over economic and diplomatic engagement.
True progress can only be achieved when governance is based on civilian supremacy, rule of law, and democratic accountability. Pakistan’s future remains bleak unless genuine democratic reforms are implemented. Free and fair elections, restoration of parliamentary authority, and judicial independence are critical to reversing the country’s downward spiral. If the current trajectory persists, Pakistan will continue to suffer economic stagnation, political instability, and social unrest.
The nation stands at a crossroads: either it embraces democratic governance and paves the way for prosperity, or it remains trapped in a cycle of military dominance and perpetual crisis. The choice will determine whether Pakistan reclaims its potential or continues to dig its own grave.

Pakistan News

Pakistan High Commission, London Convenes Experts on Leveraging AI in Healthcare in Pakistan

Published

on

By

Pilot projects for Electronic Medical Record (EMR) systems in major hospitals, starting from Islamabad, to be implemented with public-private partnership in AI and Health

The High Commission of Pakistan in London, hosted a high-level workshop on “Leveraging AI in Healthcare in Pakistan”, bringing together policy makers, AI experts, medical professionals, and academics from the UK and Pakistan.

The session was opened by the High Commissioner, who underscored the transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence to improve healthcare governance, diagnostics, electronic medical records, and medical education in Pakistan. In his pre-recorded keynote address the Federal Minister for National Health Services, Regulations & Coordination, Dr. Syed Mustafa Kamal, emphasised the need to embrace modern technologies and AI to improve public healthcare in Pakistan. In his remarks, Dr. Zubir Ahmed MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State at the UK Department of Health and Social Care, shared UK’s experience in integrating innovation and AI to enhance health equity and access.

A distinguished line-up of speakers spoke on a range of critical themes. Mr. Abu Bakar, CEO of the Pakistan Software Export Board (PSEB), shared his vision for digital transformation and enabling health technology innovation in Pakistan. Ms. Ayesha Hussain, Data Governance Lead at University of Leeds, discussed responsible AI and data quality frameworks to ensure affordable, accessible, and high-quality healthcare delivery. Mr. Omer Butt, Co-founder of Vita Healthcare Solutions, built a case for AI use-cases that reduce waiting times and treatment delays, while addressing inequities in care delivery. Dr. Mahdi Murtaza – a young doctor – presented a pathway to leverage AI for primary care transformation in Pakistan and development of AI curriculum for medical professionals.

Dr. Suhail Chughtai, Clinical Director for Orthopaedics & Trauma, London, and AI Division Chair at UK Digital Health & Care, spoke about developing an AI-enabled Electronic Medical Records (EMR) system for Pakistan. Professor Jawwad Arshad Darr, Vice Dean of Enterprise at UCL’s MAPS Faculty and Co-founder of UPSIGN, presented strategies for training and developing academic capacity for AI research in Pakistan. Dr. Shahid Latif, Chair of the British Pakistani Psychiatrists Association, focused on AI in mental health care, while Ms. Zehra Shah, CEO of OPEN London, spoke about responsible AI in healthcare and its ethical implications. The discussion concluded with Mr. Rehman Qamar, Chief Project Officer at NADRA, who highlighted how NADRA’s citizen database could underpin secure, scalable digital health systems and EMR integration in Pakistan.

Participants agreed on several key outcomes, including the need for a national AI-enabled health data strategy, public-private partnership in AI and Health, the piloting of EMR systems in major hospitals, and the development of AI training curricula for medical professionals. They noted that building a Responsible AI Framework in Healthcare, which embeds Responsible AI principles into AI Applications and processes, was a must. They also agreed to re-convene to discuss other aspects of AI in healthcare in coming days.

The High Commissioner reaffirmed its commitment to present these recommendations to the stakeholders in Islamabad, ensuring that Pakistan could harness AI to deliver better healthcare for every citizen.

London, 24th September 2025

Continue Reading

Pakistan News

Pakistan’s Voice of Conscience at the United Nations

Published

on

By

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY) :- Former Press Secretary to the President, Former Press Minister to the Embassy of Pakistan to France, Former MD, SRBC Mr. Qamar Bashir analysis : In the crowded halls of diplomacy, where words often drown in endless speeches, moments arise that define not only the speaker but the nation behind him. Such a moment recently came when Pakistan’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Ambassador Asim Iftikhar, stood before the world and dismantled Israel’s attempt to misuse Pakistan’s sacrifices in the fight against terrorism to justify its indiscriminate assault on Gaza. His intervention not only forced an unprecedented apology from Israel’s ambassador, Danny Danon, but also reaffirmed Pakistan’s moral authority as the voice of conscience for the Muslim world and for oppressed people everywhere.
For me, this triumph was not just a matter of national pride but also personal reflection. Two years ago, while waiting for an audience with President Arif Alvi in Islamabad, I met Ambassador Asim Iftikhar as he prepared to assume his responsibilities as Pakistan’s envoy to France. In those quiet minutes, I found him to be articulate, deeply thoughtful, and radiating professionalism. There was in his demeanor a rare blend of intellectual precision and quiet confidence, qualities that I felt would take him far in representing Pakistan. That impression, formed in the corridors of the presidency, has since been vindicated in the most remarkable way, culminating in his recent performance at the United Nations where he shone not only as Pakistan’s voice but as the spokesperson of the Muslim world.
The confrontation that revealed his strength of character unfolded when the Israeli ambassador attempted to draw an analogy between Israel’s bombardment of Gaza and the U.S. operation in Abbottabad, Pakistan, which killed Osama bin Laden. It was a deliberate distortion, intended to cloak genocide in the language of counterterrorism, and it invoked Pakistan’s history in a way that was both misleading and offensive. Ambassador Iftikhar rose with words that pierced the façade. He reminded the world that Pakistan had been a frontline state in the global fight against terrorism, losing more than seventy thousand men, women, and children, dismantling terror networks, and rendering sacrifices unmatched by any other nation. “Pakistan’s record,” he declared, “is bright, recognized worldwide, and written in the blood of its martyrs.” He then turned the analogy on its head, pointing out with clarity that invoking Pakistan’s sacrifices to justify the mass killing of innocents in Gaza was “outrageous, incoherent, and morally indefensible,” for what Israel was doing was not counterterrorism but genocide, ethnic cleansing, and the conversion of Gaza into a slaughterhouse.
The chamber fell silent. Rarely does rhetoric give way to truth so powerfully, and rarely is propaganda so effectively exposed. The weight of his words left Israel’s representative cornered, and in a rare act of contrition, Danny Danon publicly apologized to Pakistan, admitting that invoking its name had been inappropriate. It was more than a diplomatic win; it was a narrative triumph, a moment where Pakistan’s honor was defended, its sacrifices acknowledged, and Israel’s distortion dismantled. For Pakistan, it was a reminder of the power of words when spoken with conviction, and for the Muslim world, it was proof that a principled voice could still rise above the noise of power politics.
This intervention was not an isolated act but part of a larger continuum of Ambassador Iftikhar’s work. Again and again at the United Nations, he has projected the suffering of Gaza and the West Bank with unflinching clarity. In June this year, he declared before the General Assembly that “the situation in Gaza is a stain on our collective conscience. Over fifty-five thousand lives have been lost, including eighteen thousand children and twenty-eight thousand women. Infrastructure has been razed—homes, hospitals, schools, cultural heritage, places of worship. Famine looms. Humanitarian workers and UN personnel are being attacked with impunity. This is not just a humanitarian catastrophe; it is a collapse of humanity.” These were not the words of a man speaking only for Pakistan. They were the words of a diplomat mobilizing the conscience of the world, urging not only the Muslim community but all of civilization to act, to recognize that without justice there can be no peace. He has repeatedly called for the only viable solution: the realization of a two-state solution on pre-1967 borders, with Al-Quds Al-Sharif as the capital of a sovereign, independent, and contiguous State of Palestine.
By vividly describing demolished schools, destroyed hospitals, displaced families, starving children, and the blockade of humanitarian aid, he has carried the Palestinian tragedy from the rubble of Gaza to the chambers of the United Nations, where it cannot be ignored. He has mobilized not just the Muslim world but also neutral states, civil society, and even hesitant Western capitals to rethink their silence. His interventions have contributed to the momentum behind resolutions in the General Assembly, including Pakistan’s pivotal role in the historic vote affirming the two-state solution, a success story of multilateral diplomacy where Pakistan once again played a leading role.
His diplomacy is marked by dignity. In confronting Israel, he did not descend into anger or hyperbole. Instead, he marshaled facts, invoked moral clarity, and exposed propaganda with surgical precision. He reminded the world that the fight against terrorism cannot be equated with the slaughter of innocent civilians, and in doing so, he not only defended Pakistan’s honor but also gave voice to the millions of Palestinians trapped under bombardment and occupation. His words carried the weight of truth, and truth compelled even Israel, often shielded by its allies, to apologize.
This was Pakistan at its finest—firm, dignified, principled. It was not just defending its own history but championing the cause of justice for Palestine, exposing tyranny, and mobilizing the conscience of the world. For me, watching this unfold brought back that first impression I had of him in Islamabad, a man destined to leave his mark. He has not only fulfilled that promise but exceeded it, standing tall as a diplomat whose words moved nations and whose voice gave hope to the oppressed.
The United Nations may often be a theater of speeches with little consequence, but sometimes, words alter the moral landscape. Through Ambassador Asim Iftikhar, Pakistan has shown that truth, when spoken with conviction, can silence distortion, compel apologies, and remind the world that dignity and justice still matter. In that chamber, Pakistan’s voice was heard and respected. It was the voice of a nation that has suffered and sacrificed, yet continues to stand for justice—not only for itself but for all oppressed peoples. And in that moment, Pakistan reminded the world that diplomacy, at its best, is not about power but about conscience, and that conscience, when articulated with courage, can still shake the foundations of injustice.

Continue Reading

Pakistan News

Ambassador Mumtaz Zahra Baloch Meet The Pakistani Students In France

Published

on

By

Paris (Imran Y. CHOUDHRY):- Ambassador Mumtaz Zahra Baloch held an interactive session with a group of Pakistani students in France. The Ambassador listened to the views and concerns of Pakistani students and outlined the various initiatives of the Government of Pakistan to support overseas Pakistanis.

She underscored the important role of Pakistani students and academia in promoting Pakistan-France relations and encouraged them to act as a cultural bridge between the two societies.

Continue Reading

Trending